| Revision as of 04:20, 15 June 2010 editShock Brigade Harvester Boris (talk | contribs)15,524 edits add more, bad section title but will do for now← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 06:26, 3 September 2021 edit undoKleinpecan (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers10,230 editsm R from mergeTag: Redirect target changed |
| (288 intermediate revisions by 93 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
#REDIRECT ] |
|
'''Climate change alarmism''' or '''global warming alarmism''' is the emphasis or exaggeration of extreme negative impacts of ]. The term also often used by those who disagree with the ] as an epithet for those who broadly adhere to the consensus view. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{Redirect category shell| |
|
==Views of scientists== |
|
|
|
{{R from merge}} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{R to section}} |
|
Scientists who agree with the consensus view on global warming often have been critical of those who exaggerate or distort the risks posed by global warming. ] has criticized such exaggeration, stating that he "disapprove of the 'ends justify |
|
|
|
}} |
|
the means' philosophy" that would exaggerate dangers in order to spur public action.<ref>http://www.americanphysicalsociety.com/publications/apsnews/199608/upload/aug96.pdf</ref> Mike Hulme, professor at the ] and former director of the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, describes such exaggerations as "self-defeating," in that they engender feelings of hopelessness rather than motivating positive action.<ref>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6655449.stm</ref> ] has objected to "alarmists think that climate change is something extremely dangerous, extremely bad and that overselling a little bit, if it serves a good purpose, is not that bad."<ref>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/4923504.stm</ref> |
|
|
|
|
|
<references/> |
|