| Revision as of 18:25, 21 May 2007 editInkSplotch (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users821 edits →RFAR← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 05:30, 6 October 2021 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2)Tag: AWB |
| (47 intermediate revisions by 18 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
== RFAR == |
|
==Gold Stars== |
|
|
|
|
|
|
{| style="border: 1px solid {{{border|gray}}}; background-color: {{{color|#fdffe7}}};" |
|
I really can't see the point of trying to open up a separate vote to decline the case. Jeff can withdraw his complaint, or the clerks will remove it, probably after 5 days unless additional arbitrators show interest. If jeff is waiting for some formality before filing an RFC then anyone else who was involved in the dispute can open the RFC instead. ] 17:26, 21 May 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|rowspan="2" | |
|
:I probably should have provided some diff's, but on his own talk page Jeff has indicated he won't act on an RFC until the case is formally rejected. He indicates he believes RFC to be a waste of time. I'm not sure anyone else is motivated enough to start one, so I proffered the motion to formally reject the case now to move things along. My feelings are that 10 days from now, if Jeff starts his case he won't get as much comments as he might now. If it goes his way, the article will get recreated, which will cause those who missed the RfC to react, redelete (or go back to AfD) and start everything all over again. Or it won't go his way, and he'll take it back to RFAr....either way, I suspect it would be back to arbcom before July. |
|
|
|
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The da Vinci Barnstar''' |
|
|
|
|
|
|- |
|
:My hope, and it might be a naive one, is if this one actually hits RFC soon while many people are still talking about it we might hammer something out...or at least if it does bounce back to arbcom, it'll be an easier case to manage. It could just be my failing, I keep thinking if people would just talk it all out while it's fresh, peace could be found. I haven't got a good track record with that philosophy. --] 18:25, 21 May 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For doing my job for me: specifically, re-ordering the mire of proposed principles and FoFs on the ] arbitration case to make them readable. ]<sup>(])</sup> 17:39, 4 June 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|} |
|
|
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" |
|
|
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] |
|
|
|rowspan="2" | |
|
|
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar''' |
|
|
|- |
|
|
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | With gratitude, for helping me file an RfC after my long and fruitless wrestle with the bot. ] <small><sup>]]</sup></small> 21:58, 12 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|} |
