| Revision as of 17:41, 24 October 2006 editVinceB (talk | contribs)1,493 edits →Blocked for 1 week← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 15:21, 1 February 2007 edit undoWerdnabot (talk | contribs)60,702 editsm Automated archival of 24 sections to User:VinceB/Blabla |
| (39 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{| class="messagebox" style="background: AntiqueWhite;" |
|
''This page is rubber frendly.'' |
|
|
|
|- |
|
|
|This talk page is '''automatically archived''' by ]. Any sections older than '''7''' days are automatically archived to ''']'''. Sections without timestamps are not archived. |
|
|
|- |
|
|
|}<!-- BEGIN WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE --><!-- This page is automatically archived by Werdnabot-->{{User:Werdnabot/Archiver/Linkhere}} <!--This is an empty template, but transcluding it counts as a link, meaning Werdnabot is directed to this page - DO NOT SUBST IT --><!--Werdnabot-Archive Age-7 DoUnreplied-Yes Target-User:VinceB/Blabla--><!--END WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE--> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
<div style="padding: 5px; background: white; border: 2px solid MEDIUMBLUE;"> |
|
|
|
|
== Segitség == |
|
|
|
|
|
Juro megint akaratoskodik. Letörölte az írásomat a ]-ról, és mindezt magarázat nélkül (jellemzö rá). Kérlek segíts! ] 19:07, 23 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
{{unblock|Hey, stop this, please, and please take the time to understand the ongoing situation. I've already asked for a third opinion, but it was deleted. How to dissolve this, if all of my tryings on talk pages are ingnored/deleted, and I got blocked? Yo do not even wait for my replies. What a malicious method! On the other hand, those two are why not blocked for edit waring? Thus not me was the one, who started. See dates. I several times proved, the slides abt me before, but you still believe those, instead of the facts How many more times should I prove them to believe me (the facts) ??? }} |
|
|
|
|
|
On the other hand, you may edit the page also. It's not mine. But note, the far right is very very divided, and often hates each other. (for ex: ] & ]) An MIÉP and Jobbik and other ("real") nationalist parties describe fidesz as leftist and more often treasonous party (no need to go further , for ex) On the third hand, I am concerned, that you and (Tankred also) are mixing ] with ], since the first one is not an established concept in Central Europe, and frequently mixed with nationalism. --] 17:12, 24 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Blocked for 1 week == |
|
|
|
|
|
Since the last block expired you've done very little other than blank my previous block notice, resume edit warring, and lodge block a request at ] against other editors. If other editors do behave improperly then you're welcome to post a request in the usual places such as ] and ]. However, your actions have the appearance of a retaliatory attempt at petitioning unfamiliar administrators to block particular editors and of attempting to disguise your own history of warnings and blocks. |
|
|
|
|
|
Blocks tend to get longer and more frequent when objectionable behavior continues with no sign of improvement. Per ], you could be subject to a topic ban or site ban if this goes on. I recommend you seek a mentor from ]. The topics where you edit seem to be important to you and I'd rather see you develop into a productive editor. Respectfully, ''']''' 17:25, 24 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:The deletion of your request at ] was done by an uninvolved editor in good standing, who explained the decision in the edit note ''removed trolling.'' I reviewed that user's last 500 edits and saw nothing about Hungarian nationalism, but did see numerous housekeeping edits to various pages. ''']''' 17:35, 24 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
Then how to dissolve this problem if I can't write it there? Where to ask for? Note, that I am able to play out the block(s), but I never did it. I always made '''referenced edits''', I ''showed my references'' to those two also, see their discussion pages. I several times clearly proved how misleading their interpretations of this situation, and the describing of me, and my behaviour. Thus, I'm the one, who's edit waring and adding nonsense (sic!)... those two not even warned. Or at least asked for a source to verify their statements... --] 17:39, 24 October 2006 (UTC) |
|