| Revision as of 18:32, 13 February 2006 editFaseidman (talk | contribs)308 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 01:38, 14 October 2021 edit undoTamzin (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators69,010 editsm WP:BMB: WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Account10000Tag: Rollback | ||
| (121 intermediate revisions by 87 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #REDIRECT ] | |||
| '''Quantum immortality''' is the ] speculation deriving from the ] ] that states the ] of ] implies that ] beings are ]. | |||
| Imagine that a physicist detonates a ] beside him. In almost all ]s, the nuclear explosion will vaporize the physicist. However, there should be a small ] of alternative universes in which the physicist somehow survives (ie. the set of universes which support a "miraculous" survival scenario). The idea behind quantum immortality is that the physicist will remain alive in, and thus able to experience, at least one of the universes in this set, even though these universes form a tiny subset of all possible universes. Over time the physicist would therefore consider himself to be living forever. There are some parallels with this concept in the ]. | |||
| Another example is that provided by ] where a physicist sits in front of a gun which is triggered, or not triggered, by radioactive decay. With each run of the experiment there is a fifty-fifty chance that the gun will be triggered and the physicist will die. If the ] is correct, then the gun will eventually be triggered and the physicist will die. If the ] is correct, then at each run of the experiment the physicist will be split into a world in which he lives and one in which he dies. In the worlds where the physicist dies, he will cease to exist. However, from the point of view of the physicist, the experiment will continue running without his ceasing to exist, because at each branch, he will only be able to observe the result in the world in which he survives, and if many-worlds is correct, the physicist will notice that he never seems to die, therefore "proving" himself to be immortal, at least from his own point of view in probability. | |||
| Proponents point out that while it is highly speculative, quantum immortality violates no known laws of ] assuming two controversial assumptions are true: | |||
| 1. The many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics is the correct one, as opposed to the ], which does not support the idea of parallel universes. | |||
| 2. All of the possible scenarios in which the proposed physicist (or any entity being argued about in the thought experiment) can die support at least a small subset of survival scenarios. | |||
| The second assumption is not a necessary consequence of many-worlds scenario, because the many-worlds interpretation of quantum physics does not necessarily imply that "everything is possible", only that all outcomes that *are* possible will branch off from any given instant in time. Most physical laws of the universe still cannot be broken - for example, the ] is still considered to be conserved in all probabilities, theoretically preventing a parallel universe in which this law is violated from ever branching off. This has implications that, from the point of view of the physicist, it is possible to reach a particular configuration of reality where the physicist's survival actually becomes ], because a survival scenario would require a violation of a law of the universe that is not thought to be violated in any possible reality. | |||
| For example, in the nuclear-bomb scenario above, once the bomb detonates, it is difficult to effectively describe a scenario in which the physicist continues living that does not violate basic biological principles. Living ]s simply cannot remain alive at the temperatures found at the core of a ] under any known subsets of modern science. For quantum immortality to be true, either the bomb would have to misfire (or otherwise not ]) or an event would have to take place which made use of scientific principles that are not yet proven or discovered. Another example is natural biological death from old age, which may not be escapable in any parallel universe (at least without more advanced technology than is currently known). | |||
| Another potentially problematic area is that quantum immortality would also imply that a conscious being could "cause" itself to experience highly improbable events in its own probability simply by repeatedly placing itself in situations in which it is highly likely that the being will die. Even though in most parallel universes the being would die, the only ones that the being could possibly subjectively experience would be the ones in which it experiences the unlikely survival scenario. This may turn out to be a violation of some sort of property of ], the nature of which is still not well understood in quantum physics. | |||
| Although quantum immortality is motivated by the ] thought experiment, ], one of the inventors of this experiment, has stated that he does not believe that quantum immortality is a consequence of his work. He argues that under any sort of normal conditions, before someone dies they undergo a period of diminishment of consciousness, a non-quantum decline (which can be anywhere from seconds to minutes to years), and hence there is no way of establishing a continuous existence from this world to an alternate one in which the person continues to exist. | |||
| ==Fictional depictions== | |||
| The ] novel '']'' explores topics related to quantum immortality. | |||
| Other science fiction stories exploring these and related ideas include "]" by ], and "]" by ]. | |||
| The film ] loosely explores quantum immortality. | |||
| ]'s short story ''Death, and What Comes Next'' has a philosopher arguing the principle with Death, who has come for him. | |||
| ==See also== | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| ==External links== | |||
| * by ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
Latest revision as of 01:38, 14 October 2021
Redirect to: