| Revision as of 19:44, 11 October 2021 editThe Exterminating Angel (talk | contribs)199 edits →October 2021← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:47, 14 October 2021 edit undoDrKay (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators159,759 edits Final warning notice on Mexican Spanish.Tags: Twinkle RevertedNext edit → | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
| If you continue to disrupt Misplaced Pages, you may be ]. ''You've been told by at least three editors not to continue with edits that add editors, publishers or publication-places of journals. It is disruptive to continue with the same edits after being asked to stop multiple times. In line with ] and ], the previous version of the articles have precedence.''<!-- Template:uw-disruptive3 --> ] (]) 19:39, 11 October 2021 (UTC) | If you continue to disrupt Misplaced Pages, you may be ]. ''You've been told by at least three editors not to continue with edits that add editors, publishers or publication-places of journals. It is disruptive to continue with the same edits after being asked to stop multiple times. In line with ] and ], the previous version of the articles have precedence.''<!-- Template:uw-disruptive3 --> ] (]) 19:39, 11 October 2021 (UTC) | ||
| :I know it doesn't show but I'm terrified; but nonsense aside, I don't agree with you at all because those parameters are available by this platform for a reason, and they can be added if available, the more complete a bibliographic source, the better; ESPECIALLY, in articles where the sources are just a title and a year. So far you have been unable to tell me why should these parameters should not be used by me and instead just resorted to copy and paste generic summaries of guidelines and also went looking for other edits to other articles to also undo my edits in those as well, including that of punding where you restored a past edition half the size which had issues with a complete lack of bibliography. ] (]) 19:42, 11 October 2021 (UTC) | :I know it doesn't show but I'm terrified; but nonsense aside, I don't agree with you at all because those parameters are available by this platform for a reason, and they can be added if available, the more complete a bibliographic source, the better; ESPECIALLY, in articles where the sources are just a title and a year. So far you have been unable to tell me why should these parameters should not be used by me and instead just resorted to copy and paste generic summaries of guidelines and also went looking for other edits to other articles to also undo my edits in those as well, including that of punding where you restored a past edition half the size which had issues with a complete lack of bibliography. ] (]) 19:42, 11 October 2021 (UTC) | ||
| ] You may be '''] without further warning''' the next time you ] Misplaced Pages, as you did at ]. ''It is disruptive to continue a series of edits after being asked to stop: you are still adding editorial boards, publication places and publishing company details to academic journal citations. Please do not do this.''<!-- Template:uw-generic4 --> ] (]) 09:47, 14 October 2021 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:47, 14 October 2021
Welcome!
Hello, The Exterminating Angel, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!--MollyPollyRolly (talk) 01:04, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
journal citations
lots of students who write termpapers rely on Misplaced Pages footnotes and citations so we need to follow WP:5P5 and avoid strange citation methods that are never used by historians and can only mislead and embarrass students if they try to copy them. Many journals have lots of "editors" and the standard practice at Misplaced Pages and in the academic media is to NOT include them in citations to articles in these journals. Likewise place of publication is notr used in citing journals. Rjensen (talk) 09:45, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
October 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at George V. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Misplaced Pages's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 07:38, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Misplaced Pages, you may be blocked from editing. You've been told by at least three editors not to continue with edits that add editors, publishers or publication-places of journals. It is disruptive to continue with the same edits after being asked to stop multiple times. In line with WP:BRD and WP:CONSENSUS, the previous version of the articles have precedence. DrKay (talk) 19:39, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- I know it doesn't show but I'm terrified; but nonsense aside, I don't agree with you at all because those parameters are available by this platform for a reason, and they can be added if available, the more complete a bibliographic source, the better; ESPECIALLY, in articles where the sources are just a title and a year. So far you have been unable to tell me why should these parameters should not be used by me and instead just resorted to copy and paste generic summaries of guidelines and also went looking for other edits to other articles to also undo my edits in those as well, including that of punding where you restored a past edition half the size which had issues with a complete lack of bibliography. The Exterminating Angel (talk) 19:42, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Misplaced Pages, as you did at Mexican Spanish. It is disruptive to continue a series of edits after being asked to stop: you are still adding editorial boards, publication places and publishing company details to academic journal citations. Please do not do this. DrKay (talk) 09:47, 14 October 2021 (UTC)