Misplaced Pages

User talk:69.117.20.128: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:03, 15 May 2007 editRDates (talk | contribs)395 edits request to revert edit← Previous edit Latest revision as of 23:23, 21 October 2021 edit undoGeneralBotability (talk | contribs)Bots17,102 editsm GeneralBotability task 2: remove old IPSock templates 
(47 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{whois|Optimum Online (Cablevision Systems)}}
{| class="messagebox standard-talk" style="width: auto;"
|-
| ]
| '''This ] has been used by banned user ]'''.<br>Please refer to {{{2|]}}} for evidence. <small><span class="plainlinks">See and .</span></small>
|}{{{category|]}}}{{{category|]}}}<!-- Template:IPsock -->{{do not delete}}
----
<!-- Template from Template:Welcomeg -->{| style="background-color:#F5FFFA; padding:0;" cellpadding="0"
|class="MainPageBG" style="border:1px solid lightgrey; background-color:lightgrey; vertical-align:top; color:#000000; font-size:85%"|
{| width="100%" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="5" style="vertical-align:top; background-color:lavender; padding:0;"
! <div style="margin:0; background-color:white; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid lightgrey; text-align:left; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top:0.2em; padding-bottom:0.2em;">Hello {{PAGENAME}}! ] to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for ]. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Misplaced Pages. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place '''<tt>{&#123;helpme&#125;}</tt>''' on your ] and ask your question there. Please remember to ] on talk pages by clicking ] or by typing four tildes "~&#126;~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Misplaced Pages you might want to consider being "]" by a more experienced editor or joining a ] to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click ] for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to '''always fill in the ] field'''. Happy editing! ]
|}
{| width="100%" style="background-color:white;"
|class="MainPageBG" style="width: 55%; border:1px solid white; background-color:lightgrey; vertical-align:top"|
{| width="100%" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="5" style="vertical-align:top; background-color:Lavender"
! <div style="margin: 0; background-color:white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid lightgrey; text-align:left; color:grey; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Getting Started</div>
|-
|style="color:#000"|
* ] • ]
* How to: ] • ]
|-
! <div style="margin: 0; background:white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid lightgrey; text-align:left; color:grey; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Getting Help</div>
|-
| style="color:#000"|
* ]
* ]
* ]
|-
! <div style="margin: 0; background:white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid lightgrey; text-align:left; color:grey; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Policies and Guidelines</div>
|-
| style="color:#000"|
* ] • ]
* ] • ] • ]
* ] • ]
<hr />
* ] • ] • ]
* ] • ] • ]
* ] • ] • ]
* ] • ] • ]
|-
|}
|class="MainPageBG" style="width: 55%; border:1px solid lightgrey; background-color:Seashell; vertical-align:top"|
{| width="100%" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="5" style="vertical-align:top; background-color:Seashell"
! <div style="margin: 0; background-color:white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid lightgrey; text-align:left; color:grey; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">The Community</div>
|-
|style="color:#000"|
* ] • ]
* ] • ] • ]
* ] • ]
* ] • ]
* ] • ] • ]
|-
! <div style="margin: 0; background-color:white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid lightgrey; text-align:left; color:grey; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Things to do</div>
|-
|style="color:#000"|
* ] • ]
* ] • ]
* ] • ]
* Cleaning up: ] • ] • ]
|-
! <div style="margin: 0; background-color:white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid lightgrey; text-align:left; color:grey; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Miscellaneous</div>
|-
|style="color:#000"|
* ] • ] • ]
* ] • ]
* ] • ] • ]
]
|}
|}
|}<!--Template:Welcomeg-->



{{User anti-anon}}
Just thought that the irony would be amusing.




==BG Color==
I don't see any reason to change the background color, and unless there is a special case, there is no reason not for it to conform to the standard. ] 02:49, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

The colors are standardized by topic. --] 15:45, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
==Re: ]==
That's your opinion, which you are entitled to. I agree that as the article stands, it's biased in favour of inclusive education; but you can't counter bias with bias. See Misplaced Pages's ]. - ] 16:05, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
*Fine, but you can't state opinion as a fact, and you can't put your private opinion in articles (] generally doesn't belong in Misplaced Pages). - ] 16:16, 17 March 2007 (UTC)


Your additions seem to be a ] attack against inclusive education, an attempt to counter an argument the proponents do not actually make in the first place.

Somebody might argue that ] is an utopia, because you can't falsely shout "fire" in a crowded cinema, or - for an even more extreme example - tell somebody to commit murder. And I would respond: nobody argues that this kind of speech should be protected as a human right; in other words, your right to freedom of speech is not unlimited.

Similarly, the proponents of inclusive education don't deny that some children need specialized care; they just argue that education should be inclusive <b>to an extent it can be done</b>. - ] 16:44, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

I DID read your edits; that's why I had reverted them. - ] 16:48, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

:Ditto - please don't remove content ] ] 16:57, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi there. I noticed that you reinstated some point-of-view material into this article. I appreciate your concerns about this article, and agree that it needs work to bring it to a neutral point of view. However, your editorial comments are clearly not appropriate for an encyclopedic resource. I would appreciate it if you could rewrite your introduction in a neutral tone, or if you could offer me some suggestions as to what would satisfy you in order to prevent this turning into an edit war. I am also posting this to the article talk page so we can engage other editors in discussion. Thanks! --] (]) 22:22, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

== Chinese Indonesians ==

Please stop adding nonsense to the page. You are making up your own interpretations based upon what you think should be a fact rather than what is a fact. Please read ]. They are an ethnic group in Indonesia, and measured by the Indonesian census. (] 15:03, 15 April 2007 (UTC))
:] states that the onus to provide a citation is on those who want to add an edit, not revert. kind regards --] 15:08, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
:You didn't just removed the existing information, you invented your own uncited information to replace it with. (] 15:09, 15 April 2007 (UTC))
:Your ''Asian American'' case is irrelevant. Please don't invent your own interpretations. If you want to contribute, please do some research and cite reliable sources. (] 15:13, 15 April 2007 (UTC))

::Onus = obligation. Here's a summary of ] - particularly the third point: {{nutshell|Articles should contain only material that has been published by reliable sources.|Editors adding new material should cite a reliable source, or it may be challenged or removed by any editor.|The obligation to provide a reliable source lies with the editors wishing to include the material, not with those seeking to remove it.}}.
:::regards ] 15:14, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
:::Also, you guys should be careful of ] - I am sure you both know it. Just a friendly reminder. ] 15:14, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
:Per Merbabu : ] states that the onus to provide a citation is on those who want to add an edit, not revert. (] 15:16, 15 April 2007 (UTC))
::Please read ]. (] 15:24, 15 April 2007 (UTC))
:::I recommend you stop editing the page. You are already in violation of the ] policy, and if it continues, you will likely be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages by the administrators. (] 15:40, 15 April 2007 (UTC)).
:::You've supplied a dictionary definition for ]. That is not the same thing. Suggesting that it is the same is original research. please do not make that edit again. ] is a fundamental wikipedia policy. regards ] 15:42, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

<div style="padding:5px; border:1px solid #c0c090; background-color:#FEC;" class="user-block"> ] You have been ] from editing for {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{time|}}}|a period of '''{{{time}}}'''|a short time}} in accordance with ] for violating the ] {{{{{subst|}}}#if:Chinese Indonesian|on ]}}. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek ] rather than engaging in an ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text <nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki> below. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{signature|}}}|]] 15:47, 15 April 2007 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-block1 --> ]] 15:47, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

{{unblock reviewed|1=that's not fair! I provided a reference for the information..you didn't even give me a chance. I didn't even get a warning before. Now you tell me...that it's an unreliable source after I have been blocked...that is totally unfair...i don't deserved to be blocked...if he just tell me that earlier..|decline=Multiple warnings, clear ] violation. — ] 21:16, 15 April 2007 (UTC)}}

::You made four reinsertions edits after Merbabu warning at 15:14 UTC edit summary of prior revert says "please provide a reliable source" and then you were warned again at 15:40 by Caniago you then reinserted the information again at 15:43. ]] 15:54, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

:::That user didn't tell me it was an unreliable source...he just told me after I was blocked. That's not fair. Now I know it's an unreliable source...why can't you just give me a break...it's not my fault that the other user told me after I was blocked?

::::This revert he did edit summary of prior revert says "please provide a reliable source" ]]


::You obviously didn't read and understand the ] page. Here is a summary: {{policy in a nutshell|]ring is harmful. Editors who revert a page in whole or in part more than three times in 24 hours, except in certain special circumstances, are likely to be ] from editing.}} ] 15:58, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

I'm sorry that you were blocked. But 24 hours isn't really that long. I've put some info up the top here for you that may help. Also, consider creating an account. The main problem for me was that it was original research to say that Asian American = Chinese Indonesian. Although other people may have another opinion. Are you new to wikipedia editing? Don't worry, we all learn a lot. have a look at the info above, but just remember that wikipedia is a serious collaborative project. We need to work hard, and work with others. For example, the ] article uses the Indonesian understanding of the term. To change that changes the premise of the article. But next time, let's discuss how we can improve it. That's the wikipedia way. bye for now ] 16:10, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

== Student ==

] This is your '''last warning'''. <br />The next time you ] a page, {{#if:{{{1|}}}|as you did {{#if:{{{diff|}}}|with }} to ],|{{#if:{{{diff|}}}|as you did with ,}}}} you will be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. <!-- Template:Test4 (Fourth level warning) --> --] (]) 21:25, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

#Don't remove warnings from this page.
#Your edits to ] are hard to see as anything but vandalism. --] (]) 22:48, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

==talk page edit==

How dare you edit a message on my talk page from another user. stay out of my talk page and do not edit messages from a third party again. Insufferable. --] 11:33, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

<div style="clear: both"></div>]'''You have been {{#if:{{{1|}}}||temporarily}} ] from editing Misplaced Pages {{#if:{{{1|}}}|for a period of {{{1|}}}}} as a result of your {{#if:{{{2|}}}|disruptive edits to ]|disruptive edits}}.''' You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that ] (including page blanking or addition of ]), ], deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, ]; and repeated, blatant violations of our ] policy will not be tolerated.<!-- Template:Test5 --> --] (]) 12:07, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
{{unblock reviewed|1=I provided a reference for the special education article. How is it vandalism? I was upset because that user was talking about me. I don’t like it when people talk about me. So that’s why I deleted the message from Brideshead’s talk page. If someone talked about you, wouldn’t you be upset? |decline=That's not what you were blocked for. See below. — ] 20:25, 22 April 2007 (UTC)}}
:Good question. I have contacted the blocking admin and will ask him to give a comment here. ] 19:03, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

This user deleted third party comments from my talk page for a second time, I complained and asked for them to be blocked. --] 19:04, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

:I was too harsh concerning the edits to ], for which I apologise (the edit summary didn't seem to have much to do with the edit, which included unsourced additions, the change of scope of provisos, etc., but it was disruptive at worst, not clearly vandalism).
:The blanking of Talk-page comments, expecially in the light of the past behaviour from this IP (which, from the contributions history, would seem to be all by the same person) was the main reason for the block. When I checked the contribution history, I found a couple of minor problems; the edit to ] was given a reference, but it was to a dictionary definition whose compressed and somewhat telegraphic language didn't seem to me to be a good model for the lead of an article, though the main trouble was that "singular" simply means "special" in that context, making the definition circular. --] (]) 20:36, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Special education also includes people who do not have disabilities…such as those with behavioral problems. Now the article only says that it is only for people with disabilities. And that’s not correct. Special education includes gifted children as well. Are you saying that gifted children have disabilities? They don’t have that…so they have singular needs.

:"Singular needs" just means "special needs"; how is that elucidatory? --] (]) 21:49, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

So can we use special needs instead of saying disabilities? In the article it simply states those with disabilities.

== Checkuser relating to this user ==
Alright the only reason I'm coming to this page is to post the checkuser relating to to this user. The checkuser can be found ] <- here. This editor, like the rest of us, sometimes gets it completely right and but has problems like above. I'm not saying that this user is the only user of this IP but it's worthwhile to look at the checkuser of the editor we talk about mostly on this IP. ]] 00:11, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
:Then a block appears appropriate after all. ] 14:36, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

== Image ==

The image isn't relevant to the article; your edit summary made all sorts of ungrounded assumptions (that the girl was part of a relevant educational programme was the most significant). --] (]) 14:28, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

:"She's waving at us...so it sort of supports the article. All children with disabilities should be taught in mainstream schools."
:I don't follow this at all, I'm afraid &mdash; neither the reason that the image "supports the article" nor the connection between the two sentences.
:"Then what kind of image can we put in the article, if we can't put her in?"
:Possibly none (it's not a very graphical subject, after all). --] (]) 14:44, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

=== April 2007 ===
{{{icon|] }}}Please ] other editors, which you did here: ]. If you continue, you '''will''' be ] from editing Misplaced Pages.{{{2|}}}<!-- Template:uw-npa3 --> <font face="Verdana"><small>↔ ] (] · ]) 02:53:00, ], ] ] (])</small></font>
:''If this is a shared ], and you didn't make the edit, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''

== Re: Compulsory education ==

I wrote "between the ages of six and sixteen", that means '''between'''. I'm aware that it ends at 16. --] ] 19:59, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

==cheek==

You're a fine one to talk about being 'mean'. Vandalism is wrong, pretending it's a mistake as hundreds of editors have done with you simply let's you off with it. i'm not so weak. --] 20:05, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

== Quotes ==
Yeah I guess add them back. I'm not sure if you sourced them properly but I didn't think the quotes were an inappropriate section. I didn't remove them firstly so I don't have a problem adding them back in. ]] 20:04, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

:First, only one of the quotations had a proper reference. Secondly, at least two of the quotations were so anodyne as to be pointless. Thirdly, the Mead quotation wasn't obviously related to the article. Fourthly, quotation sections are in any case deprecated in the ]. --] (]) 21:54, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

== Abigail Breslin ==

Yeah, she's a child actress and she's categorized as that. Look at the bottom section. However, at the top, it should stay as actress because that's her career; her job. Leaving it as actress will stay consistent as she ages. The example, you gave me should be changed too. ] 23:35, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

*I came across the page Abigail Breslin by accident. Whilst you are quite correct in informing ] that it is quite okay to use the term ] it is inappropriate that you use his talk page for ] communication - no matter how frustrated you are. If you have problems with his consistent reversion of your legitimate edits please report him at ] but if I can be so bold as to suggest, try always to remain calm and collected.--] <sup>]</sup> 01:42, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

==Eric Hamber '''Secondary School'''==

I don't know how the US categorizes their schools, but in Canada, it should be secondary school, and besides, go to their website. It says Secondary School
] 16:55, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

==Alternative Education-Request to Revert Edit==

Most educators see the terms "mainstream" and "traditional" as identical. What technical difference do you believe exists between the two terms? Using both of them seems redundant. I think that one or the other, not both, should be used. Please give me your reasoning.]

Latest revision as of 23:23, 21 October 2021

Attention:Last edited:
Last edited by:23:23, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
GeneralBotability (talk · contribs)

This IP address, 69.117.20.128, is registered to Optimum Online (Cablevision Systems). In the event of persistent vandalism from this address, efforts may be made to contact them to report abuse. Contact information may be available in the WHOIS report.

If you are editing from this IP address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. Sometimes, in response to vandalism, you may be temporarily unable to create an account.

If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that it may be possible for the owner of the IP to determine who was making contributions from this address at any given time.

If you are the owner of this address responding to reports of inappropriate conduct from this address, you may find the contributions history and block log for this address helpful. Please feel free to contact any administrator who has blocked this address with questions (blocking admins will be listed in the block log).