Misplaced Pages

Natio Hungarica: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:57, 17 April 2010 view sourceBaxter9 (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers5,146 editsm Further reading: removed wrong publisher← Previous edit Latest revision as of 13:05, 1 December 2021 view source Shhhnotsoloud (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers91,587 edits Copyedit 
(48 intermediate revisions by 23 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{pp-semi|small=yes}}
The '''Natio Hungarica''' or '''Natio Hungarorum''' was a judiciary term to name the people of the ] irrespectively of their ethnic background.<ref name=Ludanyi>{{cite book
'''''{{lang|la|Natio Hungarica}}''''' ('Hungarian nation') is a ] phrase used as a medieval and early modern era geographic, institutional and juridico-political category in Kingdom of Hungary without any ethnic connotation.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.hungarianhistory.com/lib/transy/transy05.htm|title = Transylvania - the Roots of Ethnic Conflict}}</ref> The medieval ''Natio Hungarica'' consisted only the members of the ], which was composed of the ], ] clergy, and a limited number of enfranchised ] (regardless of their real ethnicity and mother tongue). The same term was extended later to denominate the whole elite with the corporate political rights of parliamentary representation in the ] — the Roman Catholic prelates, all magnates, and all nobles. The other important—and more numerous—component of ''Natio Hungarica'' was the noble members of the county assemblies in the county seats, Kingdom of Hungary had 72 counties. The noble assemblies of the counties elected most of the envoys (members) of the parliament. Those who had no direct participation in the political life on national (parliamentary) or local (counties) level (like the common people of the cities, towns, or the peasantry of the villages) were not considered part of the ''Natio Hungarica''. This medieval convention was also adopted officially in the ] of 1711 and the ]; remained until 1848, when the privileges of the ] were abolished; and thereafter acquired a sense of ].<ref>John M. Merriman, J. M. Winter, ''Europe 1789 to 1914: encyclopedia of the age of industry and empire'', Charles Scribner's Sons, 2006, p. 140, {{ISBN|978-0-684-31359-7}}</ref><ref>Tadayuki Hayashi, Hiroshi Fukuda, ''Regions in Central and Eastern Europe: past and present'', Slavic Research Center, Hokkaido University, 2007, p. 158, {{ISBN|978-4-938637-43-9}}</ref><ref>Katerina Zacharia, ''Hellenisms: culture, identity, and ethnicity from antiquity to modernity'', Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., 2008, p. 237 {{ISBN|978-0-7546-6525-0}}</ref>
|last1 = Ludanyi

|first1 = Andrew
In the modern era, ''Natio Hungarica'' is a concept in ].
|last2=Cadzow

|first2=John F.
==See also==
|last3=Elteto
* ]
|first3=Louis J.
|authorlink =
|title= Transylvania, THE ROOTS OF ETHNIC CONFLICT
|chapter = The Multiethnic Character of the Hungarian Kingdom in the Later Middle Ages; THE NATIO HUNGARICA, by L.S. DOMONKOS
|publisher = ]
|series =
|year = 1983
|doi =
|isbn = 0-87338-283-8
|ref=harv
|url=http://www.hungarianhistory.com/lib/transy/
|chapterurl=http://www.hungarianhistory.com/lib/transy/transy05.htm }}</ref> These terms should be viewed basically as indicators of geographic and not ].<ref name=Ludanyi/> Hungarian Kingdom was not a ] in the modern sense of the word,<ref name=Ludanyi/> a ], inhabited by ], ], ], ], ], ] and ], in which the ] held the dominant position.<ref name=Ludanyi/> This situation was not unique,<ref name=Ludanyi/> the medieval period does not offer examples of nation states.<ref name=Ludanyi/> An individual belonged to the "Hungarian Nation" if he or she resided under the authority of the ] (i.e., in the ]).<ref name=Ludanyi/>


==References== ==References==
<references />
{{reflist}}

==Further reading==
]
*{{cite book
|last = Maxwell
|first = Alexander
|authorlink =
|title = Multiple Nationalism: National Concepts in Nineteenth-Century Hungary and Benedict Anderson's “Imagined Communities
|publisher =
|series = Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, Volume 11, Issue 3
|year = 2005
|doi = 10.1080/13537110500255619
|isbn =}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Kingdom Of Hungary In The Middle Ages}}
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 13:05, 1 December 2021

Natio Hungarica ('Hungarian nation') is a Latin phrase used as a medieval and early modern era geographic, institutional and juridico-political category in Kingdom of Hungary without any ethnic connotation. The medieval Natio Hungarica consisted only the members of the Hungarian Parliament, which was composed of the nobility, Roman Catholic clergy, and a limited number of enfranchised burghers (regardless of their real ethnicity and mother tongue). The same term was extended later to denominate the whole elite with the corporate political rights of parliamentary representation in the early modern period — the Roman Catholic prelates, all magnates, and all nobles. The other important—and more numerous—component of Natio Hungarica was the noble members of the county assemblies in the county seats, Kingdom of Hungary had 72 counties. The noble assemblies of the counties elected most of the envoys (members) of the parliament. Those who had no direct participation in the political life on national (parliamentary) or local (counties) level (like the common people of the cities, towns, or the peasantry of the villages) were not considered part of the Natio Hungarica. This medieval convention was also adopted officially in the Treaty of Szatmár of 1711 and the Pragmatic Sanction of 1723; remained until 1848, when the privileges of the Hungarian nobility were abolished; and thereafter acquired a sense of ethnic nationalism.

In the modern era, Natio Hungarica is a concept in Hungarian nationalism.

See also

References

  1. "Transylvania - the Roots of Ethnic Conflict".
  2. John M. Merriman, J. M. Winter, Europe 1789 to 1914: encyclopedia of the age of industry and empire, Charles Scribner's Sons, 2006, p. 140, ISBN 978-0-684-31359-7
  3. Tadayuki Hayashi, Hiroshi Fukuda, Regions in Central and Eastern Europe: past and present, Slavic Research Center, Hokkaido University, 2007, p. 158, ISBN 978-4-938637-43-9
  4. Katerina Zacharia, Hellenisms: culture, identity, and ethnicity from antiquity to modernity, Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., 2008, p. 237 ISBN 978-0-7546-6525-0
Category: