Misplaced Pages

User talk:Ineffablebookkeeper: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:31, 13 December 2021 editClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,372,362 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:Ineffablebookkeeper/Archive 1. (BOT)← Previous edit Revision as of 16:29, 15 December 2021 edit undoIneffablebookkeeper (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users22,681 edits Ivermectin ArticleTags: Mobile edit Mobile web editNext edit →
Line 22: Line 22:


== Ivermectin Article == == Ivermectin Article ==
You reverted my edit to the Ivermectin article which provided three references, available from NIH, on the ability of Ivermectin to bind to the COVID-19 spike protein, indicating that it may be useful for treatment of the disease. Clinical trials are ongoing, and it is certainly not yet approved by the various agencies, but I think this information is useful. I think peer-reviewed articles from respectable journals, available at the National Institute of Health website do not qualify as "unreliable/misinformation". Here are the articles: You reverted my edit to the Ivermectin article which provided three references on the ability of Ivermectin to bind to the COVID-19 spike protein, indicating that it may be useful for treatment of the disease. Clinical trials are ongoing, and it is certainly not yet approved by the various agencies, but I think this information is useful. I think peer-reviewed articles from respectable journals do not qualify as "unreliable/misinformation". Here are the articles:
<ref name="Lehrer2020">{{cite journal |last1=Lehrer |first1=Steven |last2=Rheinstein |first2=Peter H. |date=Sep-Oct 2020 |title=Ivermectin Docks to the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Receptor-binding Domain Attached to ACE2 |url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32871846/ |journal=In Vivo |volume=34 |issue=5 |pages= |doi=10.21873/invivo.12134|access-date=Nov 11, 2021}}</ref><ref name="Saha2021">{{cite journal |last1=Saha |first1=J. |last2=Raihan |first2=M. |date=2021 |title= The binding mechanism of ivermectin and levosalbutamol with spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 |url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33867777/|journal=Structural Chemistry |volume= |issue= |pages= |doi=10.1007/s11224-021-01776-0 |access-date=Nov 11, 2021}}</ref><ref name="Eweas2021">{{cite journal |last1=Eweas|first1=A.|last2=Alhossary |first2=A.|last3=Abdel-Moneim|first3=A.|date=25 Jan, 2021|title=Molecular docking reveals ivermectin and remdesivir as potential repurposed drugs against SARS-CoV-2 |url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33746908/|journal=Front. Microbiol. 11:592908 |volume= |issue= |pages= |doi=10.3389/fmicb.2020.592908 |access-date=Nov 11, 2021}}</ref>
Please let me know if this changes your opinion. ] (]) 17:51, 11 November 2021 (UTC) Please let me know if this changes your opinion. ] (]) 17:51, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
:{{reply-to|PAR}} - no, I didn't. Per , you'll notice that {{u|Alexbrn}} is the editor who reverted you - {{em|not me}}. Your edits were reverted to the last version of the page before they were published, which was my edit; I have nothing to do with this, and I did not revert you. (Nor do I have any time to listen to horse dewormer misinformation.) Please go and take your complaints elsewhere. --] (]) 18:40, 11 November 2021 (UTC) :{{reply-to|PAR}} - no, I didn't. Per , you'll notice that {{u|Alexbrn}} is the editor who reverted you - {{em|not me}}. Your edits were reverted to the last version of the page before they were published, which was my edit; I have nothing to do with this, and I did not revert you. (Nor do I have any time to listen to horse dewormer misinformation.) Please go and take your complaints elsewhere. --] (]) 18:40, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:29, 15 December 2021


Archives
Index
Archive 1Archive 2


This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III.

Edit comments

Hi, if as at De materia medica you're making small formatting changes, i.e. even if you're not making substantial edits, please either mark these as minor (if within the rules for that) or give a brief edit comment (e.g. "tagging languages") as is good practice (and indeed policy), to save other editors from having to check for vandalism. Many thanks, Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:24, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

@Chiswick Chap: - my apologies; I'll be sure to add a brief comment in future, though editing on mobile I'm unable to mark my edits as minor. I appreciate the horror of checking through a watchlist and thinking "oh God, what now"(!) - so I'll change my behaviour going forwards. --Ineffablebookkeeper (talk) 11:01, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Many thanks! Chiswick Chap (talk) 11:07, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

October 2021

Information icon Hello, I'm Skyerise. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Sacramental bread, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Skyerise (talk) 17:35, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

As you point out, I was mistaken in reading your edit as an addition. The real problem was that the sentence you were editing was off-topic in the etymology section, so I removed it. Feel free to integrate into a more appropriate place in the article. Skyerise (talk) 19:36, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Ivermectin Article

You reverted my edit to the Ivermectin article which provided three references on the ability of Ivermectin to bind to the COVID-19 spike protein, indicating that it may be useful for treatment of the disease. Clinical trials are ongoing, and it is certainly not yet approved by the various agencies, but I think this information is useful. I think peer-reviewed articles from respectable journals do not qualify as "unreliable/misinformation". Here are the articles: Please let me know if this changes your opinion. PAR (talk) 17:51, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

@PAR: - no, I didn't. Per this diff, you'll notice that Alexbrn is the editor who reverted you - not me. Your edits were reverted to the last version of the page before they were published, which was my edit; I have nothing to do with this, and I did not revert you. (Nor do I have any time to listen to horse dewormer misinformation.) Please go and take your complaints elsewhere. --Ineffablebookkeeper (talk) 18:40, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
LOL - Ok, Ok. But horse dewormer? PAR (talk) 20:30, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Oh, Ok, I get it, Ivermectin. Sorry to bother you. PAR (talk) 20:31, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Japanese grammar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Middle Japanese.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Japanese folklore

Hello my friend can you edit zuijin Page by finding more informations about them??? 2A02:587:1E65:4700:5970:4CDB:3ACC:B947 (talk) 14:22, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Japanese Folklore

Hello my friend can you add more informations about zuijin please??? Giorcat (talk) 14:50, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Halo

"In India the head halo is called {{transl|hi|Prabhamandala}} or {{transl|hi|Siras-cakra}}, while the full body halo is {{transl|hi|Prabhavali}}.<ref>Gopinatha Rao, T. A. (1985). Elements of Hindu Iconography. " - I'd imagine these are Sanskrit in fact. Johnbod (talk) 17:01, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

@Johnbod: - Ah, thank you! I wasn't quite sure whether I was looking at Hindi or Sanskrit. I'll change the ISO code if it hasn't been done so already.--Ineffablebookkeeper (talk) ({{ping}} me!) 21:07, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Japanese costume article

You didn't actually undo my edit; you just carried on tidying up the article.

While I'm here,

  • furigana would be useful
  • it would be useful to rearrange the items in alphabetical order
  • and possibly to provide separate section headings by initial kana character---Ehrenkater (talk) 12:15, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
@Ehrenkater: - You're right, furigana would be useful - I think it's possible to combine ruby text templates with {{nihongo}}. All of the items also need reordering alphabetically, as an IP drove-by earlier and added a handful of other entries, I don't think in the right order.
I'm not sure about separate section headings per kana character; I don't think there's ever going to be enough items on the list to warrant it, but more than that, I don't think I've seen that formatting anywhere else, though please correct me if I'm wrong.--Ineffablebookkeeper (talk) ({{ping}} me!) 12:59, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

No, I haven't seen anything like that, and I agree that it would require more entries to justify it.

As regards the furigana, I agree these are shown in Japanese text as ruby text, but I think for this purpose the hiragana version in parantheses following the kanji might be easier to follow.---Ehrenkater (talk) 13:04, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Maybe - but we do have {{ruby}} at our disposal; it might make it clearer that it's the pronunciation, rather than an alternate spelling.--Ineffablebookkeeper (talk) ({{ping}} me!) 10:34, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi Ineffablebookkeeper! The thread you created at the Misplaced Pages:Teahouse, Outline of chocolate - is this really a style of article we have?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.


See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 10 December 2021 (UTC)