Misplaced Pages

Graceba Total Communications: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:28, 30 October 2009 editHmains (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers1,214,056 edits refine cat and or AWB general fixes using AWB← Previous edit Latest revision as of 20:32, 1 January 2022 edit undoSdkbBot (talk | contribs)Bots356,382 editsm →top: Removed overlinked country wikilink and general fixes (task 2)Tag: AWB 
(8 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Infobox company
{{Infobox_Defunct_Company
| company_name = Graceba Total Communications | name = Graceba Total Communications
| company_logo = | logo =
| fate = Acquired by ] | fate = Acquired by ]
| foundation = 1912 | foundation = 1912
Line 13: Line 13:
}} }}


'''Graceba Total Communications''' was an ] company that provided cable TV and broadband Internet service to ]. '''Graceba Total Communications''' was an American company that provided cable TV and broadband Internet service to ].


==Legal actions== ==Legal actions==
Graceba was involved with a legal dispute with the FCC regarding allegedly improper procedure that took place in 1994 during an auction of licenses to provide interactive video data service (IVDS) in local telecommunications markets. In 1997<ref></ref> the courts ruled against Graceba's petition, on the grounds that their complaint wasn't registered in a timely fashion.<ref></ref> Graceba then resubmitted their petition on appeal, and it was rejected by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in 2000<ref></ref>. However, the FCC did implicitly acknowledge the legitimacy of at least part of Graceba's complaints, as they issued a partial refund of fees to the participants of the 1994 auction.<ref></ref> Graceba was involved with a legal dispute with the FCC regarding allegedly improper procedures that took place in 1994 during an auction of licenses to provide interactive video data service (IVDS) in local telecommunications markets. In 1997<ref></ref> the courts ruled against Graceba's petition, on the grounds that their complaint wasn't registered in a timely fashion.<ref></ref> Graceba then resubmitted their petition on appeal, and it was rejected by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in 2000.<ref></ref> However, the FCC did implicitly acknowledge the legitimacy of at least part of Graceba's complaints, as they issued a partial refund of fees to the participants of the 1994 auction.<ref></ref>


==References== ==References==
Line 24: Line 24:
* *


{{CATV_America}} {{CATV USA}}


] ]
] ]
] ]
]

Latest revision as of 20:32, 1 January 2022

Graceba Total Communications
IndustryTelecommunications
Founded1912
Defunct2008
FateAcquired by Knology
HeadquartersDothan, Alabama
Productscable television, broadband
Websitehttp://www.graceba.com/

Graceba Total Communications was an American company that provided cable TV and broadband Internet service to Houston County, Alabama.

Legal actions

Graceba was involved with a legal dispute with the FCC regarding allegedly improper procedures that took place in 1994 during an auction of licenses to provide interactive video data service (IVDS) in local telecommunications markets. In 1997 the courts ruled against Graceba's petition, on the grounds that their complaint wasn't registered in a timely fashion. Graceba then resubmitted their petition on appeal, and it was rejected by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in 2000. However, the FCC did implicitly acknowledge the legitimacy of at least part of Graceba's complaints, as they issued a partial refund of fees to the participants of the 1994 auction.

References

  1. Text of the Decision of the District of Columbia Circuit Court
  2. Court opinion mentioning the Graceba case
  3. Text of the Decision on Appeal
  4. Request for Attorney Fees to FCC

External links

Cable, satellite, and other specialty television providers (multi-channel video programming distributors) in the United States
Cable
Satellite
Fiber
/ IPTV
Virtual
MVPD
Over-
the-top
VOD
Defunct
Cable
Satellite
IPTV
Terrestrial
Virtual MVPD
Over-the-top
Additional resources on North American television
North America
Canada
Mexico
United States
Categories: