| Revision as of 18:44, 14 February 2010 editSCZenz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users9,321 edits →radical alterations to the intro to quantum mechanics article: not the best diagram← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 20:36, 16 January 2022 edit undoMeters (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers172,144 edits Undid revision 1066081862 by Aca1291 (talk) what are you doing? The user is allowed to archive his talk pageTags: Replaced Undo | ||
| (31 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ⚫ | Welcome to my talk page; please leave new messages at the bottom. | ||
| {{werdnabot}} | |||
| * ] | |||
| ⚫ | Welcome to my talk page; please leave new messages at the bottom |
||
| == radical alterations to the intro to quantum mechanics article == | |||
| Hi, | |||
| A new editor has unilaterally made many drastic changes to the article ] to which you have made contributions. I do not think that the changes are desirable. I do not want to start an edit war. Could you please have a look at it? Thanks. ] (]) | |||
| Hi there -- I discovered that you are the contributor of ]. Please can you tell me why, in that image, you have a W+ boson coupling to four quarks? Surely the W+ in the top of the diagram should couple to an antilepton and an anti-lepton neutrino? ] (]) 14:02, 12 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :It's not the best diagram. I've known for years that this, and a lot of other things from the ATLAS article, need to be fixed. -- ] (]) 18:44, 14 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 20:36, 16 January 2022
Welcome to my talk page; please leave new messages at the bottom.