| Revision as of 11:14, 8 December 2021 edit62.64.230.121 (talk) →Background: wiki link← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 11:47, 27 January 2022 edit undoHeartmusic678 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,708 edits Merged content to Chinese_unification#Official_stance_of_People's_Republic_of_China_(Mainland_China). See Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Liberation of Taiwan.Tag: New redirect | ||
| (17 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Short description|Terminology in relations between China and Taiwan}} | |||
| #REDIRECT ] {{R from merge}} {{R to section}} | |||
| “'''Liberation of Taiwan'''” is a term used in the ] to garner ] for ] with ], proposing the use of ] to achieve it. | |||
| ==Background== | |||
| In 1956, ] first introduced the loaded term "Liberation of Taiwan," which was construed to mean a "peaceful" way to reunify with Taiwan. Despite this the government had numerous long-term military confrontations with Taiwan. The ] has set the unification of China as the most important political goal since the founding of the People’s Republic of China.<ref name="perkins">{{cite book|author=Dorothy Perkins|title=Encyclopedia of China: History and Culture|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=KMQeAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA79|year= 2013|publisher=Routledge|isbn=978-1-135-93562-7|page=79}}</ref> | |||
| In January 1979, the ] issued a notice to "compatriots" in Taiwan, which posited China's reunification as the inevitable future. Since then, the People’s Republic of China’s policy has been changed to ], but it has not promised to give up the use of force to conquer Taiwan. In 2019, ] proposed peaceful reunification based on the one country, two systems program. The government of the Republic of China led by President ] rejected the proposal.<ref name="horton">{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/05/world/asia/taiwan-xi-jinping-tsai-ing-wen.html|work=]|date=January 5, 2019|last=Horton|first=Chris|title=Taiwan's President, Defying Xi Jinping, Calls Unification Offer 'Impossible'}}</ref> | |||
| ==Extreme views== | |||
| The most radical idea, popularized on ] after the 2016 election of ], calls for the ] of all residents of Taiwan, which was subsequently modified to a version that calls for singer ] to be exempt from the genocide. There is no evidence that this policy is held by the ] or the majority of Chinese citizens.({{Lang-zh |s=留岛不留人 |t=留島不留人 |p=liú dǎo bù liú rén |l=leave island not leave people}}),<ref name="oneplusnews">{{cite web|title=中国网民呼吁武统台湾：要岛不要人(图)|url=https://www.oneplusnews.com/news/569a7e3fe4b000061561b616|website=1+新闻网|publisher=]|accessdate=2016-12-19|date=2016-01-16|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180802162751/https://www.oneplusnews.com/news/569a7e3fe4b000061561b616|archive-date=2018-08-02}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.worldjournal.com/6235022/article-%E6%AD%A6%E7%B5%B1%E7%95%99%E5%B3%B6%E4%B8%8D%E7%95%99%E4%BA%BA%E8%81%B2%E6%B5%AA%E7%AA%81%E5%A2%9E-%E6%80%8E%E9%BA%BC%E5%9B%9E%E4%BA%8B%EF%BC%9F/ |title=武統留島不留人聲浪突增 怎麼回事？|accessdate=2019-09-07 |author= |date=2019-04-16 |publisher=世界新闻网 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190926065934/https://www.worldjournal.com/6235022/article-%E6%AD%A6%E7%B5%B1%E7%95%99%E5%B3%B6%E4%B8%8D%E7%95%99%E4%BA%BA%E8%81%B2%E6%B5%AA%E7%AA%81%E5%A2%9E-%E6%80%8E%E9%BA%BC%E5%9B%9E%E4%BA%8B%EF%BC%9F/|archive-date=2019-09-26|language=Zh-hant }}</ref> which was subsequently modified to a version that calls for singer ] to be exempt from the genocide. There is no evidence that either policy is held by the ]. | |||
| ==References== | |||
| {{reflist}} | |||
| ] | |||
Latest revision as of 11:47, 27 January 2022
Redirect to:
- From a merge: This is a redirect from a page that was merged into another page. This redirect was kept in order to preserve the edit history of this page after its content was merged into the content of the target page. Please do not remove the tag that generates this text (unless the need to recreate content on this page has been demonstrated) or delete this page.
- For redirects with substantive page histories that did not result from page merges use {{R with history}} instead.
- To a section: This is a redirect from a topic that does not have its own page to a section of a page on the subject. For redirects to embedded anchors on a page, use {{R to anchor}} instead.