| Revision as of 20:31, 27 April 2013 editPenbat (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users58,229 edits →Yet another personal attack today← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 09:11, 7 February 2022 edit undoSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,318 editsm Signing comment by SpiralSource - "requested reassessment for article "holographic will"" | ||
| (34 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{User WikiProject Law|align=left}} | |||
| ==Indef block== | |||
| {{Registered Editor Ribbon}} | |||
| ⚫ | You have been blocked indefinitely per the consensus forming here Best. ] (] · ] · ]) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 14:24, 28 April 2013 (UTC) | ||
| {{Novice Editor Ribbon}} | |||
| {{Apprentice Editor Ribbon}} | |||
| {{Journeyman Editor Ribbon}} | |||
| {{Yeoman Editor Ribbon}} | |||
| {{Experienced Editor Ribbon}} | |||
| {{Reviewer topicon}} | |||
| {{click|link=Moscow International House of Music|image=Symbol question.svg|size=25px|title=Moscow International House of Music}} | |||
| {{click|link=Fred LaBour|image=Symbol question.svg|size=25px|title=Fred LaBour}} | |||
| {{click|link=J.W. Knapp Company Building|image=Symbol question.svg|size=25px|title=J.W. Knapp Company Building}} | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
| |rowspan="3" valign="middle" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="3" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Wikipedian Red Cross Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For continuously rescuing the Ref list and summarizing Ref codes on the TM and related articles. Good work!}<span style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif"> — ] • ] • </span> 20:38, 25 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Surreal Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | A little chaos can often show a mirror to the truth. But I have no idea how you have managed to stay with "that" article for so long. The thing makes me feel tired just thinking about it | |||
| |} | |||
| {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Citation Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Not the intended use of this star, but I thank you for educating me about reference sources and making me a better editor as a result. ] (]) 19:44, 16 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| == Talk page access blocked == | |||
| ==Page achiving== | |||
| Hey Fladrif. It would be much easier to follow things if you left content a little longer on your talk page. ] (] · ] · ]) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 13:53, 27 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
| Due to block evasion at {{IP|75.7.198.193}} and continuing a pattern of personal attacks. Please use ] if you want to appeal your block. ] / ] / ] / ] 03:50, 16 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ==Blocking== | |||
| ⚫ | You have been blocked |
||
| There are actually two routes for appealing your block. Personal attacks and block evasions won't get you very far. Your first place would be the ]. Should they decline your request, you can use BASC as per Dennis Brown's comments above. Regards, ] (] - ]) 16:06, 3 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :Several editors at the ANI have commented that you are not an appropriate person to adjudicate on this because of your past involvement with him. Anyway personally I think that Fladrifs behaviour is so gross over a period of years that only an indefinite ban suffices, a 72 hour ban just trivializes things. He has been blocked several times before already. --] (]) 19:37, 27 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::While feel free to put together a RfC User or request a indefinite ban at ANI. I still consider it inappropriate for a single admin to indefinitely ban a long time editor while providing zero evidence as justification. ] (] · ] · ]) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 19:40, 27 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :::What? Ched has posted twice today at AN/I saying he/she is working on a comprehensive report and several other editors including myself have provided dozens of diffs showing chronic problematic editing. What you should be doing Doc James is undoing your reversal of the indef block by Ched and waiting for the community to complete its evaluation. Instead you are supporting and perpetuating the chronic disruptive behavior of an editor with whom you have a long term connection. That is very troubling. --<span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS,sans -serif"> — ] • ] • </span> 19:47, 27 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :::You seem to be blind to the fact that the ANI is now getting very long, around 10 editors have made critical comments about Fladrif and hardly anybody supporting him. Most people would call that a consensus. Anyway it isnt fair that you who controversially did the unblock adjudicate on this ANI.--] (]) 19:55, 27 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Clarification motion == | |||
| ==Yet another personal attack today== | |||
| Fladrif, , you made today, after being blocked by Ched and unblocked by Doc James is a blatant personal attack. An attack you made without provocation, in the middle of civil discussion on content, and part of a long series of abusive comments you have directed towards User:TimidGuy over the past few years. You have been repeatedly warned by me and numerous others that this kind of behavior is unacceptable and yet you continue again and again.--<span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS,sans -serif"> — ] • ] • </span> 19:47, 27 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
| A case (]) in which you were involved has been modified by {{oldid2|631252824|Motion|motion}} which changed the wording of the ] to clarify that the scope applies to pages, not just articles. For the arbitration committee --]] 20:09, 27 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::You call this a personal attack? "This has been a persistent pattern with TimidGuy, blatantly misrepresenting sources on TM research when he can't get away with excluding them. MastCell is 110% correct - Misplaced Pages does not cherry pick out of context statements from the body of a ] compliant source to contradict the author's summary conclusions. TimidGuy has been repeatedly sanctioned for this kind of conduct following the TM ArbCom. Continuing to argue for such misrepresentation of sources is clearly sanctionable and needs to stop, now. It hardly improves things to have EMP and Spairig (resurrected from the dead, it would seem) forming a Greek chorus to urge him on. " Which part exactly? Maybe Fladrif could provide difs to support each bit. ] (] · ] · ]) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 19:52, 27 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ==Orphaned non-free image File:Warnborough ie logo.gif== | |||
| :::Frankly DocJames it looks like we may have to start an ANI on you as well. You should step away from this dispute with Fladrif as you have had various involvements with him in the past. --] (]) 19:59, 27 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
| :::I have just started that ANI ]--] (]) 20:26, 27 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
| Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 18:46, 17 December 2021 (UTC) | |||
| == Article assessment: "Holographic Will" == | |||
| Hello, I hope you are well. I would like you to please consider re-assessing this article: ]. It is currently listed as start class, although, in my opinion, it is very well put together. I am not involved in the Law community here, so I would like your perspective on this. As far as I can surmise, it's a thoroughly detailed article, breaking down the law for a significant number of countries, with more than adequate sourcing, and provides an excellent lead. To my lay impression, this strikes me as a B class article, but at the very least, it's definitely more than a start at this point. Thank you. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 09:10, 7 February 2022 (UTC)</span> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
Latest revision as of 09:11, 7 February 2022
Indef block
You have been blocked indefinitely per the consensus forming here Best. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 14:24, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
Talk page access blocked
Due to block evasion at 75.7.198.193 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) and continuing a pattern of personal attacks. Please use WP:BASC if you want to appeal your block. Dennis Brown / 2¢ / © / @ 03:50, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
There are actually two routes for appealing your block. Personal attacks and block evasions won't get you very far. Your first place would be the unblock ticket request system. Should they decline your request, you can use BASC as per Dennis Brown's comments above. Regards, Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 16:06, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
Clarification motion
A case (Transcendental Meditation movement) in which you were involved has been modified by motion which changed the wording of the discretionary sanctions section to clarify that the scope applies to pages, not just articles. For the arbitration committee --S Philbrick(Talk) 20:09, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Warnborough ie logo.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Warnborough ie logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:46, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Article assessment: "Holographic Will"
Hello, I hope you are well. I would like you to please consider re-assessing this article: . It is currently listed as start class, although, in my opinion, it is very well put together. I am not involved in the Law community here, so I would like your perspective on this. As far as I can surmise, it's a thoroughly detailed article, breaking down the law for a significant number of countries, with more than adequate sourcing, and provides an excellent lead. To my lay impression, this strikes me as a B class article, but at the very least, it's definitely more than a start at this point. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SpiralSource (talk • contribs) 09:10, 7 February 2022 (UTC)