| Revision as of 00:01, 26 February 2022 editMrsSnoozyTurtle (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users32,338 edits →Violations of WP:DRAFTIFY← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:05, 26 February 2022 edit undoDavid Eppstein (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators225,847 edits →Violations of WP:DRAFTIFY: habit of removing past warnings makes it difficultNext edit → | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
| * Hello {{u|David Eppstein}}. Thank you for the explanation, I was not aware of that part of the guideline. ] 00:01, 26 February 2022 (UTC) | * Hello {{u|David Eppstein}}. Thank you for the explanation, I was not aware of that part of the guideline. ] 00:01, 26 February 2022 (UTC) | ||
| **It is difficult to tell what you might be aware of because of your habit of removing past warnings to pay more attention to the draftification guidelines such as the one at . —] (]) 00:05, 26 February 2022 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:05, 26 February 2022
February with Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Violations of WP:DRAFTIFY
According to WP:DRAFTOBJECT, A page may only be moved unilaterally to the draftspace a single time. You moved Gerceida E. Adams-Jones to draft space twice, on December 26 and again on January 14. Both moves were bad: Adams-Jones very obviously passes WP:PROF#C3, as a fellow of a major academic society, and the article has already been cleaned up by established editors. Please stop your disruptive edits and violation of established procedures. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:58, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
- Hello David Eppstein. Thank you for the explanation, I was not aware of that part of the guideline. MrsSnoozyTurtle 00:01, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- It is difficult to tell what you might be aware of because of your habit of removing past warnings to pay more attention to the draftification guidelines such as the one at . —David Eppstein (talk) 00:05, 26 February 2022 (UTC)