| Revision as of 19:21, 13 March 2015 editCoffee (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers48,540 edits →March 2015: coding unblock request as it was no longer needed← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 10:12, 27 February 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (45 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown) | |||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| * ] | * ] | ||
| * ] | * ] | ||
| Please remember to ] your messages on ]s by typing four ]s (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out ], ask me on ], or <span class="plainlinks">{{input link |label=click here to ask for help here on your talk page |page=Special:Mytalk |preload=Help:Contents/helpmepreload |preloadtitle=Help me! |type=newsection}}</span> and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! <!-- Template:Welcome --> ] (]) 18:35 |
Please remember to ] your messages on ]s by typing four ]s (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out ], ask me on ], or <span class="plainlinks">{{input link |label=click here to ask for help here on your talk page |page=Special:Mytalk |preload=Help:Contents/helpmepreload |preloadtitle=Help me! |type=newsection}}</span> and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! <!-- Template:Welcome --> ] (]) 18:35, 1 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
| ==Delta Airlines Flight 1086== | ==Delta Airlines Flight 1086== | ||
| The better the shape the article is in, the easier it is to show that ] is met. Have a look at the ] article and you will see that there is an infobox and the article has a defined structure. Bare urls are not good either. {{tl|infobox aircraft occurrence}} is the infobox template. {{tl|cite web}} is the template to cite websites. Use <nowiki><ref name=xxxx>{{cite web |url= |title= |publisher= |accessdate=}}</ref></nowiki> at minimum (you can copy and paste this). Other parameters may be added as required. ] (]) 20:52, 10 March 2015 (UTC) | The better the shape the article is in, the easier it is to show that ] is met. Have a look at the ] article and you will see that there is an infobox and the article has a defined structure. Bare urls are not good either. {{tl|infobox aircraft occurrence}} is the infobox template. {{tl|cite web}} is the template to cite websites. Use <nowiki><ref name=xxxx>{{cite web |url= |title= |publisher= |accessdate=}}</ref></nowiki> at minimum (you can copy and paste this). Other parameters may be added as required. ] (]) 20:52, 10 March 2015 (UTC) | ||
| == |
==STOP== | ||
| {{stop}} | |||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]. Users are expected to ] with others, to avoid editing ], and to ] rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.<br> | |||
| ⚫ | Coffee, for 48 hours, do not make any edits on my user talk page without asking me first. Thank you. Do not constantly revert. Thank you. Your cooperation will be helpful in calming a situation. ] (]) 20:03, 13 March 2015 (UTC) | ||
| Please be particularly aware that ] states: | |||
| :Per ], "users may freely remove comments from their own talk pages". There are a few exceptions, but I don't see anything you removed as being covered by those exceptions. Feel free to remove entries from your own talk page. If anyone wants to see what's been posted there previously, they need only check the . Best regards, ] (]) 20:53, 13 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| # '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made'''. | |||
| ⚫ | ::::Thank you. You, Joe, are reasonable and do things to calm a situation. I, too, am trying to calm a situation. ] (]) 20:59, 13 March 2015 (UTC) | ||
| # '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' | |||
| In particular, editors should be aware of the ], which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, '''breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a ]'''. | |||
| If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-ew --> <small style="color:#999;white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:lightgrey 0.3em 0.3em 0.15em;">— ] // ] // ] // </small> 20:31, 11 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Advice == | |||
| ⚫ | <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' |
||
| :The warning wasn't a message, it was a warning. Please stop removing warning templates from your userpage. It prevents uninvolved admins from being kept up to date. <small style="color:#999;white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:lightgrey 0.3em 0.3em 0.15em;">— ] // ] // ] // </small> 20:51, 11 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| You are in a hole. I suggest that you stop digging. Digging causes the hole to get deeper. ] (]) 20:32, 14 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| {{unblock reviewed | 1=This action is totally unjustified because I have shown great restraint. I have explained myself for hours and have held back the temptation to edit. In contrast, Coffee keeps slapping the same notice on my user talk page. This shows bad judgment by escalating, not de-escalating the situation. If unblocked, I will remain calm, even become calmer. By doing so, you will maintain order in WP, not try to create mayhem. As far as edit warring, Betty Logan reported me to the AN3 board but another editor came to my defense. That person (Jetstreamer) is not my friend but actually disagrees with me in an AFD but we are both civil and respectful. Since there is no edit warring, please delete Coffee's actions and unblock. Thank you. I will repay your kindness by making your action seem wise (i.e. I will act with the utmost respect and responsibility) | decline=You were clearly edit warring, for days. While you did discuss on the talk page you failed to gain consensus and continued to edit war. Your unblock request and subsequent comment seem to indicate you blame Coffee for this block. You have not indicated that you will stop edit warring, you were not blocked for lack of calmness. I suggest you wait out this block, if you do decide to make another unblock request please read ] and consider that taking some personal responsibility would go a lot farther than blaming others. ] 21:03, 11 March 2015 (UTC)}} | |||
| :::Yes, I know. I just realized that Coffee was baiting me. He/she wanted an excuse to block me again or have someone do it for him. See how mean some admins are?! ] (]) 20:34, 14 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::::I'm afraid that's just more of the same behavior you're being warned about, WZP. Please put down the ], and step away from the conflict, or you are likely to be on the receiving end of a ]. Perhaps you should take a short break from editing, and see if you can disengage yourself from this. -- ] (]) 20:51, 14 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Enough == | |||
| You can't possibly have the opinions you claim you have, so I have no choice but to assume you're just trying to stir up trouble. We have quite enough trouble here already, thank you, we don't need more. --] (]) 20:55, 14 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| Coffee says that I must keep his message up to keep uninvolved admins up to date. If you want to be up to date, know that the dispute started when Betty Logan attacked me. She/he wants a sanitized, whitewashed, 100% positive Sound of Music article while I wanted to convey that, according to reliable sources, they had a hard time finding a director because the industry thought the film was garbage. The nice thing was the public loved it. WP readers benefit in knowing this. | |||
| ⚫ | <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' '''indefinitely''' from editing for trolling. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. However, you should read the ] first. ] (]) 20:55, 14 March 2015 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-blockindef --> | ||
| Burt Lancaster said "Jesus, you must need the money". Another director chased the screenwriter out of his house saying that he didn't want to director this kind of shit. | |||
| {{unblock reviewed | 1=I have already said sorry and mentioned disengagement, so blocking is not warranted. See my last few comments proving that I am disengaging. The act of blocking is actually a move than incites more drama and warfare, not less. In fact, I mentioned to Ponyo on my final edit that I would step back for a few hours then correct an error upon return. See this shows correct and productive Wikipedian thinking! A final note. The duration of my block is permanent. That is the Misplaced Pages equivalent of the death penalty. Please do not murder me Misplaced Pages style. Unblocking now is called for but changing it it 15 hours is ok ....... https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Ponyo&diff=prev&oldid=651383318 https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Cassianto&diff=prev&oldid=651382923 https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=651382567 https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=651382230 https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&diff=prev&oldid=651382023 https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Wowee_Zowee_public&diff=prev&oldid=651381707 | decline = I've read your last comment to Ponyo: as far as I can see, it does not look like you are stepping away, but instead appears to be yet another gambit to keep the drama going; as is the wording of the unblock request itself. You are welcome to appeal again, but I suggest you should take some time to read -- and understand -- the unblocking appeal guidelines first before doing so. -- ] (]) 21:25, 14 March 2015 (UTC)}} | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| The Anome, I don't understand. You mean that I cannot edit Misplaced Pages forever? As in a death sentence? ] (]) 21:41, 14 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| The Anome, I have read what you asked me to. My message to Ponyo was not meant to be a legal defense. It was my last words which reflect my true thoughts, that is, the desire to step back and do some good editing in a few hours. If you quote me like a prosecutor would then imagine if you die in your sleep and some prosecutor say "your last words was 'good night', now let's twist it around...good night meant that some evil intent was there." No, my message to Ponyo was just an honest, off the cuff remark that I had good intentions. | |||
| Chillum, please unblock. I will take your advice 100%. But please unblock. Your kindness in this way will be repaid many times over. Act with an iron fist and that is not what I request. I am sorry that I made you mad by the way I edited. I will work hard to not do it and won't. | |||
| If you unblock me without back and forth drama, here's what I intend to do. I intend to have a self imposed non-editing period, followed by correction of that error and trying to not fight with a few people that I think may be a bit aggressive. Stay away from the bad crowd, in other words. | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| If you insist on a death penalty (permanent blocking), that is really not right. Even drunk drivers are not executed and can drive again eventually with care not to drink. ] (]) 21:50, 14 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| <code><nowiki>{{unblock|To Chillum or others.Chillum, please unblock. I will take your advice 100%. But please unblock. Your kindness in this way will be repaid many times over. Act with an iron fist and that is not what I request. I am sorry that I made you mad by the way I edited. I will work hard to not do it and won't. | |||
| {{unblock reviewed | 1=I have carefully read what The Anome requested that I read. I will edit well and avoid conflict, even if that mean running away from a fight. I now understand what happened (disclaimer: a full report would be very lengthy but this is the best for a few lines). Coffee did not fully explain himself/herself about his 24 hour block (he/she could be a better writer - I was inaccurately accused of 3RR by an editor named B.L. and did not, though I could have been more tactful in writing--that I learned!!) so it made me quite mad to have been blocked on a false 3RR accusation. Please allow me the chance in WP. If you do, I will put my thanks on my own page and will honor your thoughtful actions by being a good Wikipedian. Even if you unblock me now, I will not edit today except maybe a thank you comment or similar, even if baited. Please do not let there be a death penalty given to me, which is what permanent, indefinite blocks are. </br> | |||
| Oh, blocks are to prevent disruption, not punishment. If you unblock, I guarantee that I will not disrupt. Therefore, please unblock. Thank you.. | |||
| A final note, The Anome invited me to reapply for the unblock request, just to read what he/she suggested, the unblock process, so I am not badgering you but following instructions. | decline = You are still blaming your block on Coffee. You do not get unlimited unblock requests, we have other people to deal with. "Death penalty" is silly, Misplaced Pages is not your life. ] 22:02, 14 March 2015 (UTC)}} | |||
| {{unblock reviewed | 1==Chillum, I am not blaming Coffee, I am stating the fact...read what I wrote..about Coffee, "I learned that I will be more tactful in writing--that I learned!!" I simply stated that I did not 3RR, that is a fact. I cannot lie and say that I did 3RR. However, I do say that I have learned how to be a good Wikipedian and will be. I hold my hat out, please do not chop off my head. Please unblock me. If you do, I will be very cautious and will not even edit to start. | decline = I cannot believe the sincerity of this request, particularly the "chop off my head" part. You are still pointing the blame for your block at everyone but yourself, and you have been entirely disruptive since you started editing Misplaced Pages. I see no evidence that your behaviour will change if unblocked. Further to this, your userpage suggests that you are an alternate account of an existing Wikipedian. If this account is an alternate account of another user, I highly recommend you disclose that account as part of any future unblock requests. If you are not, I suggest you explain your userpage. ]<sup>(]) </sup> 22:48, 14 March 2015 (UTC)}} | |||
| Please be aware that if your unblock requests are further denied, your talk page access could be revoked as well. <span style="color: blue">--</span> ] <sup><span style="font-size:80%">]</span></sup> 22:14, 14 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| Oh, I also take 1000% responsibility. I am a worthless piece of shit that should be lynched and killed. }}</nowiki></code> | |||
| :::Then administrators who don't want to unblock should just stay away and not deny it. ] (]) 22:22, 14 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| I am thinking that Floquenbeam is right. There is no way you could really think that it is reasonable that your block be reviewed only by admins who do not want to decline it. ] 22:25, 14 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| {{ping|kelapstick}} there is ], but it was created about 6 years ago, and has no contributions. <span style="color: blue">--</span> ] <sup><span style="font-size:80%">]</span></sup> 23:34, 14 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::What I mean is that I ask you not to be harsh and act with an iron fist. About being repaid, I mean that goodwill and kindness will be reciprocated in terms of good and careful editing (as well as encouragement to act civilly and nicely to all in WP) so it is for the better of Misplaced Pages. | |||
| :There is most certainly another account somewhere, though it is not under this name (reasons for suspicion ). <span style="color: blue">--</span> ] <sup><span style="font-size:80%">]</span></sup> 00:01, 15 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::Id suggest you wait 6 months whilst editing constructively elsewhere but before then declare your other account ASAP. <s>Block evasion is a criminal offence in the UK in case you're editing from there.</s> ] (]) 09:46, 15 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::Think about if the police stop you. For the sake of argument, say you were speeding slightly. Would you prefer getting a warning or a pep talk or for the police to say "you broke the law, I am taking you to jail where you will spend a few hours calling a lawyer, paying for your car to be towed, etc." That may be legal but is heavy handed. ] (]) 23:11, 11 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::: Block evasion on Misplaced Pages is not a "criminal offense" anywhere. It is just grounds for a further blocking of additional user accounts. ] <sup style="font-family:Times New Roman;">] ]</sup> 15:54, 15 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Well, it's not a "criminal offense" according to any government, but it is not allowed in Misplaced Pages. What I.P. editor 80.189.171.149 suggests ("Id suggest you wait 6 months whilst editing constructively elsewhere but before then declare your other account ASAP") is not correct to advise, given that you are blocked from editing in the English language wikipedia. If you edit in English language Misplaced Pages under a different account that would be block evasion. Don't do that. If and when you do get unblocked, though, it would be good advice to edit in different areas of the English language Misplaced Pages for 6 months or so, before returning to areas where you have been involved in conflict. Or, if the I.P. editor meant to edit constructively at other Wikimedia projects (Commons, or non-English wikipedias, where you are not blocked), that is good advice actually. Hope this helps. --]]] 15:31, 16 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| ] | |||
| A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer. Please note that articles must be on ] subjects and should provide references to ] that ] their content. | |||
| Not really an accurate comparison. This would be more like if the police warned you to stop speeding but you kept speeding anyways and then they busted you. ] 23:15, 11 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. <!-- Template:Db-redirtypo-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ] (]) 09:35, 3 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::::When I wrote that analogy, I was a little concerned because that analogy was not correct. Basically, show a little sympathy and it will be a sign of goodwill, which I will greatly reciprocate to all of Misplaced Pages. Do not try to be tough. Do not try to punish, as this is not what blocking is for. It is to prevent disruption. I promise you that I will do good and not a bit of disruption if you unblock me now rather than make me suffer. The choice is yours......iron fist or not. Thank you. ] (]) 23:35, 11 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 10:12, 27 February 2022
Welcome!
Hello, Wowee Zowee public, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to World AIDS Day. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Misplaced Pages
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 18:35, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
Delta Airlines Flight 1086
The better the shape the article is in, the easier it is to show that WP:GNG is met. Have a look at the Villa Castelli helicopter crash article and you will see that there is an infobox and the article has a defined structure. Bare urls are not good either. {{infobox aircraft occurrence}} is the infobox template. {{cite web}} is the template to cite websites. Use <ref name=xxxx>{{cite web |url= |title= |publisher= |accessdate=}}</ref> at minimum (you can copy and paste this). Other parameters may be added as required. Mjroots (talk) 20:52, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
STOP
Coffee, for 48 hours, do not make any edits on my user talk page without asking me first. Thank you. Do not constantly revert. Thank you. Your cooperation will be helpful in calming a situation. Wowee Zowee public (talk) 20:03, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
- Per WP:OWNTALK, "users may freely remove comments from their own talk pages". There are a few exceptions, but I don't see anything you removed as being covered by those exceptions. Feel free to remove entries from your own talk page. If anyone wants to see what's been posted there previously, they need only check the history. Best regards, JoeSperrazza (talk) 20:53, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you. You, Joe, are reasonable and do things to calm a situation. I, too, am trying to calm a situation. Wowee Zowee public (talk) 20:59, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Advice
You are in a hole. I suggest that you stop digging. Digging causes the hole to get deeper. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:32, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, I know. I just realized that Coffee was baiting me. He/she wanted an excuse to block me again or have someone do it for him. See how mean some admins are?! Wowee Zowee public (talk) 20:34, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
- I'm afraid that's just more of the same behavior you're being warned about, WZP. Please put down the WP:STICK, and step away from the conflict, or you are likely to be on the receiving end of a WP:BOOMERANG. Perhaps you should take a short break from editing, and see if you can disengage yourself from this. -- The Anome (talk) 20:51, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
Enough
You can't possibly have the opinions you claim you have, so I have no choice but to assume you're just trying to stir up trouble. We have quite enough trouble here already, thank you, we don't need more. --Floquenbeam (talk) 20:55, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Floquenbeam (talk) 20:55, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
Wowee Zowee public (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have already said sorry and mentioned disengagement, so blocking is not warranted. See my last few comments proving that I am disengaging. The act of blocking is actually a move than incites more drama and warfare, not less. In fact, I mentioned to Ponyo on my final edit that I would step back for a few hours then correct an error upon return. See this shows correct and productive Wikipedian thinking! A final note. The duration of my block is permanent. That is the Misplaced Pages equivalent of the death penalty. Please do not murder me Misplaced Pages style. Unblocking now is called for but changing it it 15 hours is ok ....... https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Ponyo&diff=prev&oldid=651383318 https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Cassianto&diff=prev&oldid=651382923 https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=651382567 https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=651382230 https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&diff=prev&oldid=651382023 https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Wowee_Zowee_public&diff=prev&oldid=651381707
Decline reason:
I've read your last comment to Ponyo: as far as I can see, it does not look like you are stepping away, but instead appears to be yet another gambit to keep the drama going; as is the wording of the unblock request itself. You are welcome to appeal again, but I suggest you should take some time to read -- and understand -- the unblocking appeal guidelines first before doing so. -- The Anome (talk) 21:25, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
The Anome, I don't understand. You mean that I cannot edit Misplaced Pages forever? As in a death sentence? Wowee Zowee public (talk) 21:41, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
The Anome, I have read what you asked me to. My message to Ponyo was not meant to be a legal defense. It was my last words which reflect my true thoughts, that is, the desire to step back and do some good editing in a few hours. If you quote me like a prosecutor would then imagine if you die in your sleep and some prosecutor say "your last words was 'good night', now let's twist it around...good night meant that some evil intent was there." No, my message to Ponyo was just an honest, off the cuff remark that I had good intentions.
If you unblock me without back and forth drama, here's what I intend to do. I intend to have a self imposed non-editing period, followed by correction of that error and trying to not fight with a few people that I think may be a bit aggressive. Stay away from the bad crowd, in other words.
If you insist on a death penalty (permanent blocking), that is really not right. Even drunk drivers are not executed and can drive again eventually with care not to drink. Wowee Zowee public (talk) 21:50, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
Wowee Zowee public (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have carefully read what The Anome requested that I read. I will edit well and avoid conflict, even if that mean running away from a fight. I now understand what happened (disclaimer: a full report would be very lengthy but this is the best for a few lines). Coffee did not fully explain himself/herself about his 24 hour block (he/she could be a better writer - I was inaccurately accused of 3RR by an editor named B.L. and did not, though I could have been more tactful in writing--that I learned!!) so it made me quite mad to have been blocked on a false 3RR accusation. Please allow me the chance in WP. If you do, I will put my thanks on my own page and will honor your thoughtful actions by being a good Wikipedian. Even if you unblock me now, I will not edit today except maybe a thank you comment or similar, even if baited. Please do not let there be a death penalty given to me, which is what permanent, indefinite blocks are.
A final note, The Anome invited me to reapply for the unblock request, just to read what he/she suggested, the unblock process, so I am not badgering you but following instructions.
Decline reason:
You are still blaming your block on Coffee. You do not get unlimited unblock requests, we have other people to deal with. "Death penalty" is silly, Misplaced Pages is not your life. Chillum 22:02, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Wowee Zowee public (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
=Chillum, I am not blaming Coffee, I am stating the fact...read what I wrote..about Coffee, "I learned that I will be more tactful in writing--that I learned!!" I simply stated that I did not 3RR, that is a fact. I cannot lie and say that I did 3RR. However, I do say that I have learned how to be a good Wikipedian and will be. I hold my hat out, please do not chop off my head. Please unblock me. If you do, I will be very cautious and will not even edit to start.
Decline reason:
I cannot believe the sincerity of this request, particularly the "chop off my head" part. You are still pointing the blame for your block at everyone but yourself, and you have been entirely disruptive since you started editing Misplaced Pages. I see no evidence that your behaviour will change if unblocked. Further to this, your userpage suggests that you are an alternate account of an existing Wikipedian. If this account is an alternate account of another user, I highly recommend you disclose that account as part of any future unblock requests. If you are not, I suggest you explain your userpage. kelapstick 22:48, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Please be aware that if your unblock requests are further denied, your talk page access could be revoked as well. -- Orduin 22:14, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
- Then administrators who don't want to unblock should just stay away and not deny it. Wowee Zowee public (talk) 22:22, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
I am thinking that Floquenbeam is right. There is no way you could really think that it is reasonable that your block be reviewed only by admins who do not want to decline it. Chillum 22:25, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
@Kelapstick: there is User:Wowee Zowee, but it was created about 6 years ago, and has no contributions. -- Orduin 23:34, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
- There is most certainly another account somewhere, though it is not under this name (reasons for suspicion (Global Wowee Zowee)(Global Wowee Zowee public)). -- Orduin 00:01, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
- Id suggest you wait 6 months whilst editing constructively elsewhere but before then declare your other account ASAP.
Block evasion is a criminal offence in the UK in case you're editing from there.80.189.171.149 (talk) 09:46, 15 March 2015 (UTC)- Block evasion on Misplaced Pages is not a "criminal offense" anywhere. It is just grounds for a further blocking of additional user accounts. Liz 15:54, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
- Well, it's not a "criminal offense" according to any government, but it is not allowed in Misplaced Pages. What I.P. editor 80.189.171.149 suggests ("Id suggest you wait 6 months whilst editing constructively elsewhere but before then declare your other account ASAP") is not correct to advise, given that you are blocked from editing in the English language wikipedia. If you edit in English language Misplaced Pages under a different account that would be block evasion. Don't do that. If and when you do get unblocked, though, it would be good advice to edit in different areas of the English language Misplaced Pages for 6 months or so, before returning to areas where you have been involved in conflict. Or, if the I.P. editor meant to edit constructively at other Wikimedia projects (Commons, or non-English wikipedias, where you are not blocked), that is good advice actually. Hope this helps. --doncram 15:31, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
- Block evasion on Misplaced Pages is not a "criminal offense" anywhere. It is just grounds for a further blocking of additional user accounts. Liz 15:54, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
- Id suggest you wait 6 months whilst editing constructively elsewhere but before then declare your other account ASAP.
Speedy deletion nomination of Parker Rice
A tag has been placed on Parker Rice requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Jerodlycett (talk) 09:35, 3 April 2015 (UTC)