Misplaced Pages

Talk:Feminism/to do: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Talk:Feminism Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:16, 4 December 2011 editCailil (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,119 editsm mark theoretical schools as partly done← Previous edit Latest revision as of 11:24, 6 March 2022 edit undoBookku (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users17,913 editsNo edit summary 
(44 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
;Improve article to ]
<small>
#The articles citations need attention. All references need to use the <nowiki>{{cite}}</nowiki> template.
#Theoretical schools: The second paragraph seems be entirely about literary theory. You need to place this paragraph in the context of feminist theory in general, showing us why a discussion of literary theory is appropriate here.{{partly done}}
#10 citations need specific reference to page numbers.
#Science: Could a sentence or two explaining how these ideas differ from the traditional scientific view be added along with what the response of the scientific community to these ideas has been?
#Section on "Mid-twentieth century" needs work: a) the first paragraph needs to bring together the de Beauvoir material and the second-wave material better; b) it should mention "difference feminism" somehow - it needs to convey that the assumptions underlying second-wave feminism were different than those underlying first-wave feminism.
#Lead: mention feminism's effects on society, since that is a major part of the article
#The "Socialism" subsection does not explain the general impact as well the other two sub-sections. It is too factoid-based.
#The movements & ideologies section may need reorganization in order to make it clearer and less complex for readers.
#Explanation of "feminisms", as in "multiple feminisms" in the Movements section
#Introduction to "Relationship to political movements" section needs revision.
#Summarize ] and integrate.
#The "Late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries" section seems US-centric. What is going on in the rest of the world right now?{{partly done}}
#Consider the structure and hierarchy of contents with regard to ]
#<s>Similarly, the article has a picture some Parisian suffragettes, but France is not even mentioned in the article body.{{done}}
#Update ] further for ]’s ‘Before She Sleeps’ <ref>https://www.thehindu.com/books/life-before-men-vineetha-mokkil-reviews-bina-shahs-before-she-sleeps/article33470261.ece https://www.newindianexpress.com/lifestyle/books/2021/mar/21/before-she-sleeps-book-review-reluctance-rebellion-revolt-2278675.html https://www.telegraphindia.com/culture/books/review-before-she-sleeps-by-bina-shah/cid/1805002 ; Afzal, Malik Haroon; Pakri, Muhamad Rashidi Mohd; and Abdullah, Nurul Farhana Low (2021). Is Women’s
#Literature section - the second two paragraphs may be overly specific, giving the names of a few important feminist texts instead of describing the general development of feminist literature as a whole. The entire period from 1818 until the 1960s is skipped over. Undue weight may be given to ].</s>{{done}}
Empowerment a Thucydides’ Trap for Patriarchy in Pakistan? The Aurat (Woman) March-2020 and Bina
Shah’s Before She Sleeps. Journal of International Women's Studies, 22(9), 111-127. </ref>


{{Reflist-talk}}
Please see ]

Latest revision as of 11:24, 6 March 2022

Improve article to featured standards
  1. The articles citations need attention. All references need to use the {{cite}} template.
  2. 10 citations need specific reference to page numbers.
  3. Section on "Mid-twentieth century" needs work: a) the first paragraph needs to bring together the de Beauvoir material and the second-wave material better; b) it should mention "difference feminism" somehow - it needs to convey that the assumptions underlying second-wave feminism were different than those underlying first-wave feminism.
  4. The "Socialism" subsection does not explain the general impact as well the other two sub-sections. It is too factoid-based.
  5. Explanation of "feminisms", as in "multiple feminisms" in the Movements section
  6. Summarize Women's rights and integrate.
  7. Consider the structure and hierarchy of contents with regard to featured standards
  8. Update Feminist literature further for Bina Shah’s ‘Before She Sleeps’

References

  1. https://www.thehindu.com/books/life-before-men-vineetha-mokkil-reviews-bina-shahs-before-she-sleeps/article33470261.ece https://www.newindianexpress.com/lifestyle/books/2021/mar/21/before-she-sleeps-book-review-reluctance-rebellion-revolt-2278675.html https://www.telegraphindia.com/culture/books/review-before-she-sleeps-by-bina-shah/cid/1805002 ; Afzal, Malik Haroon; Pakri, Muhamad Rashidi Mohd; and Abdullah, Nurul Farhana Low (2021). Is Women’s Empowerment a Thucydides’ Trap for Patriarchy in Pakistan? The Aurat (Woman) March-2020 and Bina Shah’s Before She Sleeps. Journal of International Women's Studies, 22(9), 111-127.