Revision as of 15:16, 4 December 2011 editCailil (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,119 editsm mark theoretical schools as partly done← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 11:24, 6 March 2022 edit undoBookku (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users17,913 editsNo edit summary | ||
(44 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
;Improve article to ] | |||
<small> | |||
#The articles citations need attention. All references need to use the <nowiki>{{cite}}</nowiki> template. | |||
#Theoretical schools: The second paragraph seems be entirely about literary theory. You need to place this paragraph in the context of feminist theory in general, showing us why a discussion of literary theory is appropriate here.{{partly done}} | |||
#10 citations need specific reference to page numbers. | |||
#Science: Could a sentence or two explaining how these ideas differ from the traditional scientific view be added along with what the response of the scientific community to these ideas has been? | |||
#Section on "Mid-twentieth century" needs work: a) the first paragraph needs to bring together the de Beauvoir material and the second-wave material better; b) it should mention "difference feminism" somehow - it needs to convey that the assumptions underlying second-wave feminism were different than those underlying first-wave feminism. | |||
#Lead: mention feminism's effects on society, since that is a major part of the article | |||
#The "Socialism" subsection does not explain the general impact as well the other two sub-sections. It is too factoid-based. | |||
#The movements & ideologies section may need reorganization in order to make it clearer and less complex for readers. | |||
#Explanation of "feminisms", as in "multiple feminisms" in the Movements section | |||
#Introduction to "Relationship to political movements" section needs revision. | |||
#Summarize ] and integrate. | |||
#The "Late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries" section seems US-centric. What is going on in the rest of the world right now?{{partly done}} | |||
#Consider the structure and hierarchy of contents with regard to ] | |||
#<s>Similarly, the article has a picture some Parisian suffragettes, but France is not even mentioned in the article body.{{done}} | |||
#Update ] further for ]’s ‘Before She Sleeps’ <ref>https://www.thehindu.com/books/life-before-men-vineetha-mokkil-reviews-bina-shahs-before-she-sleeps/article33470261.ece https://www.newindianexpress.com/lifestyle/books/2021/mar/21/before-she-sleeps-book-review-reluctance-rebellion-revolt-2278675.html https://www.telegraphindia.com/culture/books/review-before-she-sleeps-by-bina-shah/cid/1805002 ; Afzal, Malik Haroon; Pakri, Muhamad Rashidi Mohd; and Abdullah, Nurul Farhana Low (2021). Is Women’s | |||
#Literature section - the second two paragraphs may be overly specific, giving the names of a few important feminist texts instead of describing the general development of feminist literature as a whole. The entire period from 1818 until the 1960s is skipped over. Undue weight may be given to ].</s>{{done}} | |||
Empowerment a Thucydides’ Trap for Patriarchy in Pakistan? The Aurat (Woman) March-2020 and Bina | |||
Shah’s Before She Sleeps. Journal of International Women's Studies, 22(9), 111-127. </ref> | |||
{{Reflist-talk}} | |||
Please see ] |
Latest revision as of 11:24, 6 March 2022
- Improve article to featured standards
- The articles citations need attention. All references need to use the {{cite}} template.
- 10 citations need specific reference to page numbers.
- Section on "Mid-twentieth century" needs work: a) the first paragraph needs to bring together the de Beauvoir material and the second-wave material better; b) it should mention "difference feminism" somehow - it needs to convey that the assumptions underlying second-wave feminism were different than those underlying first-wave feminism.
- The "Socialism" subsection does not explain the general impact as well the other two sub-sections. It is too factoid-based.
- Explanation of "feminisms", as in "multiple feminisms" in the Movements section
- Summarize Women's rights and integrate.
- Consider the structure and hierarchy of contents with regard to featured standards
- Update Feminist literature further for Bina Shah’s ‘Before She Sleeps’
References
- https://www.thehindu.com/books/life-before-men-vineetha-mokkil-reviews-bina-shahs-before-she-sleeps/article33470261.ece https://www.newindianexpress.com/lifestyle/books/2021/mar/21/before-she-sleeps-book-review-reluctance-rebellion-revolt-2278675.html https://www.telegraphindia.com/culture/books/review-before-she-sleeps-by-bina-shah/cid/1805002 ; Afzal, Malik Haroon; Pakri, Muhamad Rashidi Mohd; and Abdullah, Nurul Farhana Low (2021). Is Women’s Empowerment a Thucydides’ Trap for Patriarchy in Pakistan? The Aurat (Woman) March-2020 and Bina Shah’s Before She Sleeps. Journal of International Women's Studies, 22(9), 111-127.