| Revision as of 06:47, 1 February 2006 editKAJ (talk | contribs)129 edits Texas article← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 20:32, 12 April 2022 edit undoIznoRepeat (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users50,076 editsm unsubst or remove substed template in support of TemplateStyles migrationTag: AWB | ||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{old XfD multi |date=October 18, 2005 |result='''no consensus''' |page=Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/David Even Pedley}} | |||
| {| class="Talk-Notice" | |||
| |- | |||
| |] | |||
| | style="text-align: center" | | |||
| This article was nominated for ''''']''''' on October 18, 2005. | |||
| The result of the discussion was '''no consensus'''. <!-- see below--> | |||
| An archived record of this discussion can be found ]. | |||
| <!-- | |||
| This template adds articles to ].--> | |||
| <!-- please do not add bolding to '''no consensus''' here: this breaks many places where it is already specified --> | |||
| |} ''']]]''' 00:21, 27 October 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==Untitled== | |||
| This page is being marked for possible deletion. Please do not remove notice at the top of the article. ] 01:55, 18 October 2005 (UTC) | This page is being marked for possible deletion. Please do not remove notice at the top of the article. ] 01:55, 18 October 2005 (UTC) | ||
| Line 35: | Line 26: | ||
| Mr. Davidpdx: That Texas article was one of the best I've seen on DoM. | Mr. Davidpdx: That Texas article was one of the best I've seen on DoM. | ||
| However, it doesn't seem fair to list a dead man in the category as a fraudster. Nevertheless, I'm glad to see that you are finally contributing instead of merely reverting related articles. Congratulations on your award for defending Dominion of Melchizedek. Best, ] 06:47, 1 February 2006 (UTC) | However, it doesn't seem fair to list a dead man in the category as a fraudster. Nevertheless, I'm glad to see that you are finally contributing instead of merely reverting related articles. Congratulations on your award for defending Dominion of Melchizedek. Best, ] 06:47, 1 February 2006 (UTC) | ||
| == Arbitration == | |||
| Dominion of Melchizedek and '''associated articles''', shall be semi-protected. '''If necessary, Johnski (talk • contribs • page moves • block user • block log), or any other editor believed by an administrator to be a sockpuppet or meatpuppet of Johnski, may be blocked indefinitely by any administrator'''. The article may be unprotected (and reprotected) at the discretion of any admin who deems it safe to do so. ] 13:04, 9 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Merge == | |||
| The content in this article has been merged into ]. Please discuss any changes on that talk page. ] 13:32, 31 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 20:32, 12 April 2022
 | This article was nominated for deletion on October 18, 2005. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
Untitled
This page is being marked for possible deletion. Please do not remove notice at the top of the article. Davidpdx 01:55, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
Photo of David Pedley
I noticed two photos of the subject of this article on the melchizedek.com web site. One showing him on a Concord flight, and the other standing in a Mexican prison. Should one or both of these photos be in the article?
- The photo is way too large. You really should try to find a smaller photo of him. I don't think it matters if he is shown in Mexico or the US, but the size should be small enough that it could be put on the right hand side and have the text go around it. It would certainly make it look a lot better. Davidpdx 10:56, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
- Thanks to whomever scaled down the picture, it looks a lot better now. Davidpdx 11:15, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
Needs references and fact check
Added one reference after the fact, needs more for content. Needs fact check.--FloNight 01:44, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
Flo, I found some additional sources I'm adding. I still think additional work needs to be done, therefore I would only call my sourcing a start. I did some copy editing for clarity as well. Davidpdx 11:15, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
Clarification on his name
Is this article under the correct spelling or not? If it is not, it needs to be moved to the correct spelling. Davidpdx 12:11, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
Texas article
Mr. Davidpdx: That Texas article was one of the best I've seen on DoM. However, it doesn't seem fair to list a dead man in the category as a fraudster. Nevertheless, I'm glad to see that you are finally contributing instead of merely reverting related articles. Congratulations on your award for defending Dominion of Melchizedek. Best, KAJ 06:47, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
Arbitration
Dominion of Melchizedek and associated articles, shall be semi-protected. If necessary, Johnski (talk • contribs • page moves • block user • block log), or any other editor believed by an administrator to be a sockpuppet or meatpuppet of Johnski, may be blocked indefinitely by any administrator. The article may be unprotected (and reprotected) at the discretion of any admin who deems it safe to do so. Davidpdx 13:04, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
Merge
The content in this article has been merged into Dominion of Melchizedek. Please discuss any changes on that talk page. Davidpdx 13:32, 31 March 2006 (UTC)