| Revision as of 05:51, 21 December 2020 editRJFJR (talk | contribs)Administrators155,205 edits Filled in 7 bare reference(s) with reFill 2← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 08:23, 17 April 2022 edit undoKlbrain (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers86,437 edits Merged content to Terri Schiavo case#Schiavo memo, redirecting; unopposed 2021 proposal (easy-merge)Tag: New redirect | ||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #REDIRECT ] | |||
| {{Cleanup bare URLs|date=December 2020}} | |||
| {{Terri Schiavo}} | |||
| During the ] in March 2005, a ]s memo on the controversy was written by ], the legal counsel to ] Senator ] of ].<ref name=autogenerated1>{{Cite web|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna7412110|title=Senator’s office produced Schiavo memo|website=NBC News}}</ref> The memo suggested the Schiavo case offered "a great political issue" that would appeal to the party's ] (core supporters) and could be used against Senator ], a ] from ] who was up for ], because he had refused to co-sponsor the bill which came to be known as the ].<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2002213728_memo20.html|title=The Seattle Times: Nation & World: GOP memo says issue offers political rewards<!-- Bot generated title -->}}</ref> Bill Nelson was nevertheless reelected as Senator on November 7, 2006 with 60% of the vote. | |||
| {{R from merge}} | |||
| Martinez stated that he had not read the memo before he inadvertently passed it to ] Senator ], a Democratic supporter of the ] legislation which gave ] ] to review the Terri Schiavo case.<ref name=autogenerated1 /> Then it became public knowledge. | |||
| {{R to section}} | |||
| After the existence of the memo was reported by ] and '']'', Senate Majority Leader ] denounced the memo and asserted that the Republican Party's interest in the case was solely based on moral grounds. Darling remained silent about his authorship of the memo as commentators from the conservative magazine '']'' and other publications questioned its authenticity.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/005/406istku.asp|title=The ABCs of Media Bias<!-- Bot generated title -->}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/005/416virea.asp|title=Fake but Accurate Again?<!-- Bot generated title -->}}</ref> The source of the memo had not been disclosed by either ABC News or ''The Washington Post''. ''The Washington Post'' says that it neither implied that the memo originated from a Republican source nor that it was circulated by Republicans, though it did in fact make these assertions when it published the story by reporters Mike Allen and Manuel Roig-Franzia on its wire service on March 19, 2005. The authorship claim was removed before publication of the print version on March 20, 2005.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A11250-2005Mar29.html|title=Doubts Raised On Schiavo Memo (washingtonpost.com)|website=www.washingtonpost.com}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A24015-2005Apr3.html|title=Leaving the Anchor Desk, Its Greatest Generation (washingtonpost.com)|website=www.washingtonpost.com}}</ref> On April 6, 2005, Darling admitted to writing the memo, and resigned his position as legal counsel to Senator Martinez.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/|title=Washington Post: Breaking News, World, US, DC News & Analysis|website=Washington Post}}</ref> | |||
| ==References== | |||
| {{reflist}} | |||
| {{DEFAULTSORT:Schiavo Memo}} | |||
| ] | ] | ||
| ] | ] | ||
Latest revision as of 08:23, 17 April 2022
Redirect to:
- From a merge: This is a redirect from a page that was merged into another page. This redirect was kept in order to preserve the edit history of this page after its content was merged into the content of the target page. Please do not remove the tag that generates this text (unless the need to recreate content on this page has been demonstrated) or delete this page.
- For redirects with substantive page histories that did not result from page merges use {{R with history}} instead.
- To a section: This is a redirect from a topic that does not have its own page to a section of a page on the subject. For redirects to embedded anchors on a page, use {{R to anchor}} instead.