| Revision as of 07:16, 8 February 2007 edit60.242.13.87 (talk) →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:49, 20 February 2007 edit undoFeloniousMonk (talk | contribs)18,409 edits →[]: NPA warningNext edit → | ||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| ::''Not that Adam would know real science if he tripped over it'' deal with the article, not the editors. ] 06:33, 8 February 2007 (UTC) | ::''Not that Adam would know real science if he tripped over it'' deal with the article, not the editors. ] 06:33, 8 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :::Well Josh, deal with Adam who spouted forth on alleged pseudo-science, instead of dealing with the facts in the article in question.] 07:16, 8 February 2007 (UTC) | :::Well Josh, deal with Adam who spouted forth on alleged pseudo-science, instead of dealing with the facts in the article in question.] 07:16, 8 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ::::Knock off the personal attacks. ] 05:49, 20 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Warning: Jonathan Sarfati == | |||
| Per ], you will be blocked from editing if you continue to edit ]. Oh, and knock off the personal attacks and disruption, too. ] 05:42, 20 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:49, 20 February 2007
Point about Jonathan Sarfati, but I'm a bit worried, as they're all a bit... odd, and rather uncritical. Adam Cuerden 03:10, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
- OK Adam, but then name any of his ideological opponents who have so much criticism on their page. For example, see the next section, where Quiddity has censored out the slightest critical link against the atheist Sam Harris. There should be the same standard for all. If the likes of Sam Harris are allowed to have articles free of criticism, then so should Jonathan Sarfati without repeated requests to remove the article. Especially as Sarfati is more highly qualified, a better selling author and a chess champion of his country.60.242.13.87 08:44, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
External links
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the external links you added to the page Letter to a Christian Nation do not comply with our guidelines for external links. Misplaced Pages is not a mere directory of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Misplaced Pages uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Quiddity 08:02, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- This is nonsense. This link was a proper one by a well known Christian internet apologist. As the article stands, it violates NPOV since it is highly lacking in criticisms. So what specific rule did this link violate? 60.242.13.87 08:41, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Jonathan Sarfati
Behave yourself 60.242.13.87: Misplaced Pages:No personal attacks Josh Parris 02:04, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Some people are way too sensitive. It is a statement of fact that a number of users hostile to creation vandalized the article, then abused their power to ban their ideological opponents from editing.60.242.13.87 06:21, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Not that Adam would know real science if he tripped over it deal with the article, not the editors. Josh Parris 06:33, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Well Josh, deal with Adam who spouted forth on alleged pseudo-science, instead of dealing with the facts in the article in question.60.242.13.87 07:16, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Knock off the personal attacks. FeloniousMonk 05:49, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- Well Josh, deal with Adam who spouted forth on alleged pseudo-science, instead of dealing with the facts in the article in question.60.242.13.87 07:16, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Not that Adam would know real science if he tripped over it deal with the article, not the editors. Josh Parris 06:33, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Warning: Jonathan Sarfati
Per Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_arbitration/Agapetos_angel#Agapetos_angel_et_al._banned, you will be blocked from editing if you continue to edit Jonathan Sarfati. Oh, and knock off the personal attacks and disruption, too. FeloniousMonk 05:42, 20 February 2007 (UTC)