Revision as of 21:17, 6 July 2022 editReaper Eternal (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Checkusers, Administrators62,577 edits Marking request as checked← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:02, 7 July 2022 edit undoTamzin (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators69,010 edits →Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments: re RENext edit → | ||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
:* See also the other comments at ANI (such as the "You Can't Catch Me" edits). There is also some other evidence strongly linking the two accounts (ES0 and GBFEE) but per BEANS I'd rather not place that online, and can provide by email if necessary. ] 07:07, 6 July 2022 (UTC) | :* See also the other comments at ANI (such as the "You Can't Catch Me" edits). There is also some other evidence strongly linking the two accounts (ES0 and GBFEE) but per BEANS I'd rather not place that online, and can provide by email if necessary. ] 07:07, 6 July 2022 (UTC) | ||
*Enlightenedstranger0 and GBFEE are {{unrelated}} to each other and most likely {{unrelated}} to Daner's Creek. {{nc}}. ] (]) 21:17, 6 July 2022 (UTC) | *Enlightenedstranger0 and GBFEE are {{unrelated}} to each other and most likely {{unrelated}} to Daner's Creek. {{nc}}. ] (]) 21:17, 6 July 2022 (UTC) | ||
*:{{re|Reaper Eternal}} To clarify, is this a finding of no technical relation, or an affirmative finding of not being the same person? <span class="nowrap"> <span style="font-family:courier">-- ]</span><sup>]'']</sup> (she|they|xe)</span> 00:02, 7 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> | ----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
Revision as of 00:02, 7 July 2022
Daner's Creek
Daner's Creek (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Daner's Creek/Archive.
05 July 2022
– A checkuser has completed a check on relevant users in this case, and it is now awaiting administration and close.
Suspected sockpuppets
- Enlightenedstranger0 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- GBFEE (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- 5.184.76.71 (talk · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
- 37.47.128.238 (talk · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
- Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools
Main discussion with evidence at WP:ANI#GBFEE's_aspersion_casting_and_likely_sockpuppetry. Permalink as of 09:15, 5 July 2022.
Added here for recordkeeping purposes and per WTT's comment.
The previous Enlightenedstranger0 SPI was closed with no action per WP:BLOCKPREVENTATIVE, but Enlightenedstranger0 has continued to disprupt.
CUs working this case should see the notes in cuwiki Kolya Butternut (talk) 09:40, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
- @Tamzin: I'm confused by the mentions of apparent evidence where I can't easily find that evidence. I don't have any thoughts about who or who isn't a sock, but given the pretty startling claims at ANI it would be good to be precise. Sorry to be dumb but I can't find the "Catch Me If You Can" or "You Can't Catch Me" diffs mentioned by Black Kite. Is that merely suggesting that someone is trolling, or is it related to Flyer? What "behavioral comparisons to" (from ANI) Flyer are there? (I'm not after an exhaustive statement, just a couple of examples.) At ANI, Black Kite wrote "then produce this for their first edit" as being unbelievable for a first edit. That is understandable but another way of looking at that diff is that GBFEE is definitely not a sock of anyone with a clue because such a person would be much more discreet. Re "this comment in August and its characteristic detour into praise" below, what text is praise? I don't see it. Johnuniq (talk) 10:43, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Johnuniq: The "Can't Catch" edit are here (read the article names of the last six articles edited, from earliest to latest. Note that the 3 edits to You Can't Catch Me deliberately reverted each other, it was just the article names they wanted). There's no doubt that ES0 is a sock (or at least a returning editor) and it's equally obvious that there's a link between ES0 and GBFEE - even if they aren't socks, there is a link between them. Black Kite (talk) 11:15, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Clerk endorsed with respect to GBFEE per general behavior, and, in particular, this comment in August and its characteristic detour into praise for Flyer22, her brother, and her friends. (See my recent comment at AN/I about why comparisons to Flyer are useful evidence in finding someone impersonating her.) As to Enlightenedstranger0, I'm sure the reviewing CU will know better than I whether there's any value in re-checking. -- Tamzin (she|they|xe) 05:49, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
- See also the other comments at ANI (such as the "You Can't Catch Me" edits). There is also some other evidence strongly linking the two accounts (ES0 and GBFEE) but per BEANS I'd rather not place that online, and can provide by email if necessary. Black Kite (talk) 07:07, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
- Enlightenedstranger0 and GBFEE are Unrelated to each other and most likely Unrelated to Daner's Creek. No comment with respect to IP address(es). Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:17, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Reaper Eternal: To clarify, is this a finding of no technical relation, or an affirmative finding of not being the same person? -- Tamzin (she|they|xe) 00:02, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Categories: