| Revision as of 19:36, 23 July 2022 editHorse Eye's Back (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users51,592 edits →Merging of Spotting rifle into Sub-caliber training← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:03, 25 July 2022 edit undo1234567890Bobdob (talk | contribs)55 editsm →July 2022Next edit → | ||
| Line 92: | Line 92: | ||
| If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases, it may be appropriate to ]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be ] from editing.''' <!-- Template:uw-ew --> ] (]) 18:57, 23 July 2022 (UTC) | If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases, it may be appropriate to ]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be ] from editing.''' <!-- Template:uw-ew --> ] (]) 18:57, 23 July 2022 (UTC) | ||
| :You're at three reverts... I'm at two reverts... And you're warning me? Classy. ] (]) 18:59, 23 July 2022 (UTC) | :You're at three reverts... I'm at two reverts... And you're warning me? Classy. ] (]) 18:59, 23 July 2022 (UTC) | ||
| user loves to provide excessive, uncesscary, redudant, and unessacary additions to articles. | |||
Revision as of 18:03, 25 July 2022
| This is Horse Eye's Back's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Speedy deletion nomination of Dead Air Silencers
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Dead Air Silencers, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Misplaced Pages:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. scope_creep 17:06, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
Consecration of Russia
Why is talking about prayers recommended by Our Lady of Fatima non-encyclopedic in a topic about "conversion" of Russia? Jesuitsj (talk) 07:51, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- There is no independent coverage I can find, coverage in a Catholic newspaper isn't going to cut it. Prayer recommendations aren't really encyclopedic and just to be clear the topic of Consecration of Russia isn't the conversion of Russia to christianity its the fringe religious concept know as the "Consecration of Russia." Horse Eye's Back (talk) 16:09, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- So you have to remove all the Catholic topics in the entire Misplaced Pages because most of their sources are from Catholic sources! Jesuitsj (talk) 12:22, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- How do you get there? Please review WP:RS Horse Eye's Back (talk) 17:30, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- So you have to remove all the Catholic topics in the entire Misplaced Pages because most of their sources are from Catholic sources! Jesuitsj (talk) 12:22, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Dead Air Silencers for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dead Air Silencers is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Dead Air Silencers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
FalconK (talk) 02:20, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
Absurd ideas about the rules
First of all, you are not an admin to decide on 3RR you opinion has no value beyond this.
Second, Regarding your post on my talk page:
- == Adding unreferenced controversial information about living persons ==
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Misplaced Pages about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Draft:Alina Lipp. Thank you. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 17:23, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- That's a draft, not in mainspace. Mathmo 18:10, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
The draft article 2 sentences is covered in the sources mentioned. In other words, you are completely wasting my time and I am quite annoyed that I have to justify anything I do with you. 666hopedieslast (talk) 19:05, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- WP:BLP "Editors must take particular care when adding information about living persons to any Misplaced Pages page." Any means any... including main, wiki, user, draft, and talk. All are covered by our BLP policy. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 19:08, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
stop editing the draft article
It is a draft. Quit the bullying. 666hopedieslast (talk) 22:48, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
- WP:BLP applies to drafts. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 22:50, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
- This is not a BLP issue. you bully 666hopedieslast (talk) 22:53, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
- Of course it is, the subject is a living person. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 22:54, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
- This is not a BLP issue. you bully 666hopedieslast (talk) 22:53, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
3RR warning on draft article warning
An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page—whether involving the same or different material—within a 24-hour period. An edit or a series of consecutive edits that manually reverses or undoes other editors' actions—whether in whole or in part—counts as a revert. Violations of this rule often attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Fourth reverts just outside the 24-hour period will usually also be considered edit-warring, especially if repeated or combined with other edit-warring behavior. See below for exemptions
666hopedieslast (talk) 22:53, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
- "See below for exemptions... Removing contentious material that is libelous, biased, unsourced, or poorly sourced according to Misplaced Pages's biographies of living persons (BLP) policy." WP:NOT3RR Horse Eye's Back (talk) 00:03, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Horse Eye's Back
Thank you for creating SIG MCX Spear.
User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for the article!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:13, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- You're welcome! Horse Eye's Back (talk) 02:19, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Third Opinion
A Third Opinion has been requested for an interpretation of reliable sources on Pray and Work. Manannan67 (talk) 19:47, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Taiwan foreign relations - Donetsk and Luhansk
The whole point of adding that paragraph about Donetsk and Luhansk, despite it being unsourced, was that I wasn't sure whether to put these two territories into the article in the first place. According to the main article "List of states with limited recognition", it is indeed necessary to add these two territories. It is obvious that Taiwan has relations with neither Donetsk nor Luhansk, and that Taiwan recognises the territories as belonging to Ukraine. There should be sources available about Taiwan denouncing Russia's recognition of the two territories as sovereign states. If Donetsk and Luhansk are deemed to be unsuitable for the main article, then there's no need to add them to this subsection of Taiwan's foreign relations article. Jargo Nautilus (talk) 02:34, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
- Don't add unsourced material. End of story. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 16:26, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
A discussion taking place
A discussion taking place here may be of interest to you. The corresponding material at Scott Ritter has been removed until consensus is reached at the Open Discussion page. DO NOT restore the material until agreement fully in your favor has been reached. Regards, Mercy11 (talk) 07:51, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
Merging of Spotting rifle into Sub-caliber training
I added some illustrations and text to the latter article, as well as wikilinks leading to and from it, please check it now. What do you think about merging the quite detailed, but too specifically named article (all spotting rifles are sub-caliber training devices but not vice versa), into a more general topic which you marked as possibly not notable? Here are some sources which may demonstrate notability and in generally help to understand the wideness of the topic in general: https://www.rifleman.org.uk/Morris_Aiming_Tube.html, https://talesfromthesupplydepot.blog/2020/05/09/two-pounder-sub-calibre-training-round, https://www.warrelics.eu/forum/world-firearms/british-sub-caliber-training-devise-1971, https://armamentresearch.com/2x35-sub-calibre-training-device-used-as-amr-in-syria, https://books.google.com/books?id=C9QsLVcm474C&pg=PA393, https://www.police1.com/police-products/firearms/training/articles/training-with-sub-caliber-firearms-m79uie4uyJJ7pps1 Ain92 (talk) 11:29, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
- Unfortunately not all spotting rifles are sub-caliber training devices. However thank you for the sources. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 19:36, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
July 2022
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Alliance Defending Freedom. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Elizium23 (talk) 18:57, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
- You're at three reverts... I'm at two reverts... And you're warning me? Classy. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 18:59, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
user loves to provide excessive, uncesscary, redudant, and unessacary additions to articles.