| Revision as of 12:03, 24 May 2006 edit202.134.188.20 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 22:00, 7 August 2022 edit undoVeverve (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users57,628 edits Notification: listing of Catholic Resistance at WP:Redirects for discussion.Tag: Twinkle | ||
| (46 intermediate revisions by 21 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {| style="text-align:center; border: 2px solid #FF5500; background-color:#FFFFF3" | |||
| I am reorganizing my talk page; I realize that I have been wrongly using it as my diary of Wiki-experiences, but that it should be purely a "talk" page or a place where other Wikipedians communicate with me. | |||
| |- padding:1em;padding-top:0.5em;" | |||
| |style="font-size: 85%"| | |||
| This user has had enough of the insolence, arrogance, ignorance and gross stupidity of Wikipedian bureaucrazy, and has opted out. He has deleted most, if not all of his user page and his personal pages, but his talk page is being forcibly retained in the typical exercise of Wikipedian arrogance and insolence. Please do not leave any messages here, as this user will not visit here any more. | |||
| |} | |||
| <br><br> | |||
| I will be restoring these messages. | |||
| __TOC__ | |||
| Additionally, I think that I should create a separate ]. ] 07:00, 17 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==Consensus Vote on ]== | |||
| If you have made over 100 edits, please consider voting on which summary to use for the ] entry. Vote here: | |||
| http://en.wikipedia.org/User:Pathoschild/Sandbox#Draft_Summary_Lima_.234 | |||
| {| class="infobox" width="150" | |||
| You have to vote on each of the two summaries, indicating whether you oppose or support... ] 08:41, 6 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| |- | |||
| !align="center"|] | |||
| ] | |||
| ---- | |||
| |- | |||
| |align="center"|] ] | |||
| |} | |||
| <br><br> | |||
| == Obrigado == | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Thank you for helping me on my article at ]. I also hope to edit for the Portuguese Misplaced Pages some day. (I also LOVE the language of saudade) | |||
| Please jump in. We can use more eyes to fix this article. Right now you may wish to look at the Talk archives. ] [[User_talk:dominick|<sup>(ŤαĿĶ)</sup>]] 14:30, 28 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ] 21:22, 2 July 2006 (UTC)]] | |||
| :Dear Dominick - Thanks; after I had added, I read the talk page prohibition not to add without first discussing and realized that I would probably get a tongue lashing, but I am relieved. Thanks once again. ] 16:04, 28 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :That's fine. I am trying my best to be of par here at Misplaced Pages, so hope my article was good, in spite of the errors I made. Also, I hope to be able to be considered an "exception newcomer" or something like that by the general community. ] 05:13, 3 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| ::Thanks for the star... | |||
| I notice that you have added category:ChristianSocialists. I had added Category:Communist because the text stated that he had been a Marxist from before his ordination. May I know why then have you categorized him as "Christian Socialist"? Did he return to a belief, in whatever form, in Christianity? If so, before, or simultaneous to adding this category, you should add such a statement, shouldn't you? And if he returned to Christianity, he does not meet the qualification of being a Communist, but of being a "former Communist" (or Marxist), doesn't he? | |||
| ] | |||
| Regards, | |||
| ] |
From: Novo-rei, ] 02:54, 6 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| == 210.211.142.17 == | |||
| :One can be *both* a Marxist and a Christian simultaneously. Now true, there are many Marxists who say you cannot along with many Christians but, nevertheless, there are individuals, some of whom are listed as "Christian socialists" who professed to be both. ] 19:12, 28 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Hello - I agree that ] has been engaging in spam vandalism. However, I'm not an admin and cannot block him/her myself. Also, his last edit was 4 days ago. Generally admins don't block a user when their last vandalism was more than a few hours prior. I recommend keeping an eye on this user's edits. If you notice him spamming, leave him another final message ({{tl|spam4}}) on his talk page. If he continues to spam ''soon'' thereafter, report him here: ]. I know leaving another "final4 message" may seem redundant since he/she already has one on the talk page, but leaving another one shows the blocking admin that the user has seen a warning recently. | |||
| ::Please, will you assert that one can be both a Muslim and a "Kafir" and face the consequences of it? Is it merely because Christians are generally not militant but are easygoing that one believes that one can offend and insult them and get away with it? I am aware that there are "Christian Socialists" and I can have no problem with them, except rejecting them as heretics, because the label is legitimate in that they, even though mistakenly, believe that they can be both Christians and Socialists. But there is no basis for claiming the same with Hagerty, or if there is, you must insert it into that article first (and probably prove it, but it is my policy not to fight on subjects on which I know nothing). I would suggest that you either prove that Hagerty met the definition of Christian Socialist or that you remove that categorization. Of course, this is not too important for me, and I will cease following up this matter from here on. ] 03:15, 29 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| I hope this information helps. Please let me know if you have any other questions or concerns --] ] 04:38, 10 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::You seem to think there is no such thing as a Christian Socialist. Nevertheless, there are a number of people who have asserted to be both and there is an entire "Christian Socialist" school of thought. Perhaps you should read the ] article?] 03:45, 29 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :::According to Joyce Kornbluh, Hagerty was: | |||
| == Civility == | |||
| ::::''"a Catholic priest from New Mexico who had been converted to Marxism even before his ordination in 1892. Suspended by his archbishop for urging Telluride miners to revolt during his tour of Colorado mining camps in 1903, his formal association with the church ended at this time, although he insisted that be was still a priest in good standing"'' | |||
| Please refrain from winding people up on talk pages, as you did . Thankyou. ''']''' <nowiki>|</nowiki> ] 06:10, 11 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| OK, I've reviewed your past history and it doesn't look good and seems to have occurred before, and you have been around for a long time so you should know better. So I have handed you a 10 day block. ''']''' <nowiki>|</nowiki> ] 07:52, 11 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::Note that he was converted to Marxism *before* his ordination yet went ahead with it and continued to regard himself as a priest even after the was expelled. Evidently he thought of himself as both a Marxist and a Christian regardless of your opinion of him. Do you have any evidence that he ceased to regard himself as a Christian once he became a socialist? ] 03:51, 29 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Talk page blanking == | |||
| ::::Dear Ma'am, - Thanks for the reply. What is important is Hagerty's insistence that he continued to remain a priest "in good standing", so that therefore he qualifies as a "Christian Socialist"; that much is enough, and all the above would have been avoided if you had provided this quote earlier. As for his "insistence", I can only say that I feel sorry for him and his self-deceit! A man who was very well educated, and educated in a Catholic seminary may deceive himself, but knows that when he has effectively ceased to be Catholic, and has been cast out, is is deep spiritual trouble, and if he truly believed in Catholicism, would have taken the trouble to cease and reform his ways. One's soul is more important that matters of this earth, however justified one's notions may be or not be. It remains a fact that there can be no animal that is both wolf and lamb, so that there cannot be anyone who is truly Christian and Socialist, self-deceit apart. ] 04:16, 29 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| You cannot blank your own talk page. It serves as a record of your actions and must be kept. ] 05:32, 31 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Ma'am? Anyway, the article already said he became a Marxist prior to his ordination so the fact that he was both a Christian and a socialist should have been evident. I think you're allowing your personal views interfere. NPOV is an important principle at wikipedia. ] 04:47, 29 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :If you want out, then stop editting. ] 05:37, 31 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::If you seriously do not want to be an editor of Misplaced Pages, then just leave. Never sign back in. Just do not blank your own talk page. There are problems with that. ] 05:39, 31 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::And your subpages can be deleted by tagging them with {{tl|db-user}} which I did for that one page that you did blank. ] 05:43, 31 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| {{cquote|When I delete my pages because I want out, can you stop your pompous self-important meddling in my affairs? I am not deleting other people's pages, but my own. You got a problem? Can't mind your own business? ] 05:35, 31 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::Dear Homey, - Sorry about the "Ma'am" part. My mistake. I keep my "NPOVs" out of entries, and I do not believe that I have permitted it to enter the Hagerty page. Talk pages are another matter, and I do not believe that Misplaced Pages's NPOV rules apply there. And, it was not apparent to me that he was a Christian Socialist merely from the info that he was a Marxist prior to his ordination, for he could have been a secret Marxist. I doubt that he informed his Seminarian authorities or his ordaining bishop of his Marxist beliefs, for they would not have ordained him otherwise. At least, by and large, it was so in those days, although today things may be seen diffently by the ''Catholic'' Church (You must know that I am post-Sedevacantist). Regards. ] 04:58, 29 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :You still cannot delete your talk page. ] 05:36, 31 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Oh, really? And why is that? If I want out of Misplaced Pages, I cannot? And, apparently, that also goes for my original pages created as subsidiaries to my talk page? Wow, this is fantastic! Has Hitler come back to life? Or is it Stalin? ] 05:38, 31 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| "I keep my "NPOVs" out of my entries" | |||
| :If you want out of Misplaced Pages, then just leave. Never sign back in. Just do not blank your own talk page. ] 05:39, 31 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| I have had enough of the criminal insolence and arrogance of you lot. Nguyen was not the first, and you will certainly not be the last. It is my right to remove my personal pages, and in preventing that, you tresspass on my rights. This, in civil law; I do not care for Misplaced Pages's internal rules. I not only want out of Misplaced Pages, I also want my personal pages out, and that is my right. I am not asking for any charity or privileges but to mind my own business. Please stop meddling in my affairs - although, from my long experience, I know that you will not cease your present outrageous encroachments on my rights. ] 05:43, 31 July 2006 (UTC)}} | |||
| Doesn't seem that way looking at ]. ] 05:23, 29 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| I'm copying this over here for a reason. There is nothing "criminal" about what Misplaced Pages, its administration, and its users are doing to you. What '''you''' are doing is against '''our''' rules at Misplaced Pages. ] This includes this page, a User talk page. No one is encroaching on your rights. We are not a part of the US government, so free speech does not cover Misplaced Pages. Misplaced Pages has the right to remove and keep what it wants. And your user talk page is under this. ] 05:48, 31 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Well, you are wrong. And if you are seeking to file legal charges against Misplaced Pages, you'll find yourself unable to edit anymore. ] 05:55, 31 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Your edits were not NPOV which is why they were reverted. ] 05:39, 29 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==Your dispute== | |||
| == A Message to Pro-Life Wikipedians == | |||
| My suggestion is that you reread the terms and conditions of use and ]. Ryulong is correct here. I'm sorry you've had such a difficult time, but Ryulong is only enforcing the rules of Misplaced Pages, as is the prerogative of any editor, especially those who patrol for vandalism. You are not being targeted by anyone, only being expected to abide by the terms and conditions of use to which you agreed by editing on Misplaced Pages. --] 06:19, 31 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| The section "Foetal Pain" (Fetal Pain) has been deleted from the Abortion article. Could you help restore it? If you would like to see what was deleted, go to my talk page, scroll to "Fetal Pain," and click | |||
| the provided link.--] 22:33, 28 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==Image copyright problem with Image:Joseph rene vilatte.gif== | |||
| :Dear Sir, - Couldn't find your version, apparently deleted. But I did find ], and I would only suggest that the article be inserted into main Misplaced Pages as its own entry, expanded and linked to from within ]. Then you could either protect it or ask for protect for it, if things get problematic. | |||
| ] | |||
| :Perhaps, this may help: I had found a Powerpoint presentation "In The Womb" from an Italian hospital on the MangaloreanCatholics list. I am certain that the moderator (Paladka) would be willing to mail it to you. | |||
| Thank you for uploading ]. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Misplaced Pages takes ] very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the '''license''' and the '''source''' of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a ''']''' to the ]. | |||
| If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the ]. Thanks again for your cooperation. ] <sup>]</sup> 07:06, 4 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Regards. ] 03:06, 29 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==Speedy deletion of ]== | |||
| == CCW == | |||
| ] A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the ], such articles may be deleted at any time. Please ], as well as our subject-specific ]. | |||
| If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> to '''the top of ]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on ''']''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact ] to request that a copy be emailed to you. <!-- Template:Db-bio-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ]] 13:42, 23 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| I saw your comment at ] that you would oppose any suggestion to delete the church. Please consider voting at ]. Thanks. --] 00:17, 30 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==] of ]== | |||
| :Thanks, but too late now to vote, I believe. I was down with ]. Regards. ] 15:48, 30 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ]  because of the following concern: | |||
| ::That's alright. The curch survived without your vote. It's a shame that we lost such ]. Of course, this MfD was probably just one of the many factors in his decision to leave. Hopefully he will come back after he gets some "wiki-free" relaxation. --] 18:50, 30 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :<b>No reference does not meet ]</b> | |||
| While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ]. | |||
| == Fetal Pain == | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| I did turn it into a proper article if you'd like to see...]. Now I just need to find out a way to link it. Can you help? ] | |||
| Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> will stop the ], but other ]es exist. The ] can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> ] (]) 15:35, 15 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == BC Prob == | |||
| ==Unreferenced BLPs== | |||
| There is a problem with wikipedians changing the Euripides pages dating system to BCE/CE... especially SlimVirgin. I want to explain the situation incase you can help...I originally tried to change a wikipedia page from BCE/CE to BC/AD User:Shanes told me it's wiki policy to use the dates out lined by the creator of the page. I searched and found that the Euripides page originally used the BC/AD dating system and changed it with a summary. Now others are putting it back to BCE/CE. Can you help? ] | |||
| ] Hello WikiSceptic! Thank you for your contributions. I am a ] alerting you that '''1''' of the articles that you created is tagged as an]. The ] policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure ], all biographies should be based on ]. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current '']'' article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{tl|unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article: | |||
| # ] - <small>{{findsources|Geert Jan Stuyver}}</small> | |||
| == new church? == | |||
| Thanks!--] (]) 18:01, 16 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==] of ]== | |||
| New Church-ize? ] ] 17:14, 6 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ]  because of the following concern: | |||
| :I see, well Pope Benedict, nee Ratzinger currently owns the keys to the Vatican. ] ] 17:37, 6 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :'''No evidence of notability; only a very few google hits, and a couple of minor quotes showing up in google news archives.''' | |||
| While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ]. | |||
| You asked me. I said it before in the page I thought it wasn't the best idea. We have a lot of articles in the topic that are obviously in need of work more than a "resistance" dictionary. ] ] 18:03, 6 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| In the wrong place, on your user page, Pathos made a suggestion. I also suggested to use categories one already exists for this, and merge the info. My biggest beef is separation of the Catholic church into sects, like the useless Neo- prefix, or taking informal movements and elevating them into dogmatic structures. I am adding merge tags now, to help you out. ] ] 18:18, 6 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. The ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> ] (]) 08:55, 21 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| == Dictionary of the Catholic Resistance == | |||
| Your article ] would be most appropriate as a ]. See the description of a WikiProject: | |||
| <blockquote style="padding:1em; border:1px dashed #2f6fab; color:black; background-color:#f9f9f9;">A WikiProject is a collection of pages devoted to the management of a specific family of information within Misplaced Pages. It is not a place to write encyclopedia articles, but a resource to help coordinate and organize article writing. The attached talk pages are a convenient forum for those interested in a particular project. Projects can also have associated Wikiportals.</blockquote> | |||
| // ] 16:17, 6 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| :Sorry about posting that on your user page. Oops >_>;. A WikiProject isn't much different from the way it currently is; I'll set up the WikiProject for you. There are a few minor changes that I'd suggest you make, such as setting goals and specific tasks (see ]), but overall nothing that needs immediate attention. // ] 18:46, 6 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ] (]) 13:36, 2 June 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| Check out the ] article and edit it to keep it focused on Jesus and a biographical account of Him. Watch the Jesus page to keep it focused on Him. Thank you. ] 22:38, 6 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| == Blatant personal attacks == | |||
| This relates to the ]. Note that personal attacks are very much against both the spirit and the policies of Misplaced Pages; see ]. The comments have been immediately archived. If you would like to discuss another user's comments, please do so with civility. Thank you. // ] 14:01, 7 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ''']]''' 08:09, 10 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Pro-life Alliance == | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article ] has been nominated for deletion. ] | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| == Can you help == | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ''']]''' 07:30, 14 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
| I would appreciate help with watching ] and ] both of which I feel have merit and are only being classified unencyclopedic because the "editor" has a grudge against me. ] | |||
| == Proposed deletion of William J. Morgan (Sedevacantist) == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ]  because of the following concern: | |||
| ==Congratulations== | |||
| :'''No evidence of ]''' | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ]. | |||
| I congratulate you for being normal and for opposing the band of very obvious Marxists and others leaning in that direction, who are presently causing havoc on the entry for ]. It is a major and deliberate demonisation attempt, common with The Left. | |||
| Lauder-Frost is a leading light in his Church (although, not RC), and has a wife and two young children. There can be no excuse for what these people are attempting to do to him/his current reputation, other than it is entirely a political witch-hunt. They have now clicked on links to other people and organisations via his article and are attacking them also, as well as directing others to them.] 14:51, 9 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| == Partial Agreement With Your Leaving == | |||
| Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 16:09, 30 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
| Using an anonymous IP, I wish to express my partial agreement with your leaving Misplaced Pages. The WIkipedia is based on humanistic values, and as such, will fail to be a viable community, which is only possible under Christian values. As long as Misplaced Pages stands as is, it will always be humanistically run and biased toward humanistic opinion. ] 19:44, 13 December 2005 (UTC) (A Misplaced Pages User, Observer, and Skeptic Also) | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| ==Please look at this page== | |||
| ] | |||
| If you are a supporter of Don Bosco, take a look at this page. | |||
| *] ] 04:36, 27 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done for the following reason: | |||
| ==your subpage listed in ]== | |||
| I noticed you have a user-subpage listed in ]. Is that intentional? or is this something that should be cleaned up? Thanks!] 09:54, 23 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| {{center|1=''Article now created at ] by someone''}} | |||
| I went ahead and removed the category tag. Drop me a line if thats a problem.] 10:30, 24 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Under the ], pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time. | |||
| == Compliment == | |||
| If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request ]. <!-- Template:Db-reason-notice --> §§]§§ <small>{] / ]}</small> 08:32, 15 June 2016 (UTC) | |||
| I know you dont know me but i would like to say this.Man you are realy catholic. Thats good I would just like to say that I am tired of all the hypocrites and the people who sin on saturday and of ask for forgiveness every saturday. The people who are only christian so they can go to heavan. And thas why I hope purguaratury exists. Anyway You are not one of these people. So good for you. God bless you. ] 18:38, 4 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == "Catholic Resistance" listed at ] == | |||
| ==Edits on Ram Janmabhoomi== | |||
| ] | |||
| As an Indian and a Roman Catholic (both give me neutrality on the extremely tense issue) I find the two sections biased and volatile . See the talk page formore. They are opinionated and speculative and hence should not be included. They are , as I presume, simply copy-pasted from Hindu fundametalist propaganda material. I strongly feel that they should be removed since they serve only as misinformation for those not fully aware with circumstances | |||
| An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect ] and has thus listed it ]. This discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 22:00, 7 August 2022 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 22:00, 7 August 2022
|
This user has had enough of the insolence, arrogance, ignorance and gross stupidity of Wikipedian bureaucrazy, and has opted out. He has deleted most, if not all of his user page and his personal pages, but his talk page is being forcibly retained in the typical exercise of Wikipedian arrogance and insolence. Please do not leave any messages here, as this user will not visit here any more. |
|
|---|
| 1 2 |
Obrigado
Thank you for helping me on my article at Confederation of the Equator. I also hope to edit for the Portuguese Misplaced Pages some day. (I also LOVE the language of saudade)
- That's fine. I am trying my best to be of par here at Misplaced Pages, so hope my article was good, in spite of the errors I made. Also, I hope to be able to be considered an "exception newcomer" or something like that by the general community. OMEN 05:13, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for the star...
From: Novo-rei, NOVO-REI 02:54, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
210.211.142.17
Hello - I agree that 210.211.142.17 has been engaging in spam vandalism. However, I'm not an admin and cannot block him/her myself. Also, his last edit was 4 days ago. Generally admins don't block a user when their last vandalism was more than a few hours prior. I recommend keeping an eye on this user's edits. If you notice him spamming, leave him another final message ({{spam4}}) on his talk page. If he continues to spam soon thereafter, report him here: Misplaced Pages:Administrator intervention against vandalism. I know leaving another "final4 message" may seem redundant since he/she already has one on the talk page, but leaving another one shows the blocking admin that the user has seen a warning recently.
I hope this information helps. Please let me know if you have any other questions or concerns --AbsolutDan 04:38, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Civility
Please refrain from winding people up on talk pages, as you did here. Thankyou. Blnguyen | rant-line 06:10, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
OK, I've reviewed your past history and it doesn't look good and seems to have occurred before, and you have been around for a long time so you should know better. So I have handed you a 10 day block. Blnguyen | rant-line 07:52, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk page blanking
You cannot blank your own talk page. It serves as a record of your actions and must be kept. Ryūlóng 05:32, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
- If you want out, then stop editting. Ryūlóng 05:37, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
- If you seriously do not want to be an editor of Misplaced Pages, then just leave. Never sign back in. Just do not blank your own talk page. There are problems with that. Ryūlóng 05:39, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
- And your subpages can be deleted by tagging them with {{db-user}} which I did for that one page that you did blank. Ryūlóng 05:43, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
| “ | When I delete my pages because I want out, can you stop your pompous self-important meddling in my affairs? I am not deleting other people's pages, but my own. You got a problem? Can't mind your own business? WikiSceptic 05:35, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Oh, really? And why is that? If I want out of Misplaced Pages, I cannot? And, apparently, that also goes for my original pages created as subsidiaries to my talk page? Wow, this is fantastic! Has Hitler come back to life? Or is it Stalin? WikiSceptic 05:38, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
I have had enough of the criminal insolence and arrogance of you lot. Nguyen was not the first, and you will certainly not be the last. It is my right to remove my personal pages, and in preventing that, you tresspass on my rights. This, in civil law; I do not care for Misplaced Pages's internal rules. I not only want out of Misplaced Pages, I also want my personal pages out, and that is my right. I am not asking for any charity or privileges but to mind my own business. Please stop meddling in my affairs - although, from my long experience, I know that you will not cease your present outrageous encroachments on my rights. WikiSceptic 05:43, 31 July 2006 (UTC) |
” |
I'm copying this over here for a reason. There is nothing "criminal" about what Misplaced Pages, its administration, and its users are doing to you. What you are doing is against our rules at Misplaced Pages. These pages are not yours. They are Misplaced Pages's. This includes this page, a User talk page. No one is encroaching on your rights. We are not a part of the US government, so free speech does not cover Misplaced Pages. Misplaced Pages has the right to remove and keep what it wants. And your user talk page is under this. Ryūlóng 05:48, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
- Well, you are wrong. And if you are seeking to file legal charges against Misplaced Pages, you'll find yourself unable to edit anymore. Ryūlóng 05:55, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Your dispute
My suggestion is that you reread the terms and conditions of use and Misplaced Pages:Copyright. Ryulong is correct here. I'm sorry you've had such a difficult time, but Ryulong is only enforcing the rules of Misplaced Pages, as is the prerogative of any editor, especially those who patrol for vandalism. You are not being targeted by anyone, only being expected to abide by the terms and conditions of use to which you agreed by editing on Misplaced Pages. --Chuchunezumi 06:19, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Joseph rene vilatte.gif
Thank you for uploading Image:Joseph rene vilatte.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Misplaced Pages takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Shell 07:06, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Pierina da Silva
A tag has been placed on Pierina da Silva requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. RavichandarMy coffee shop 13:42, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Narayan Waman Tilak
The article Narayan Waman Tilak has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No reference does not meet WP:bio
While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Linguisticgeek (talk) 15:35, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
Hello WikiSceptic! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
- Geert Jan Stuyver - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 18:01, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Francesco Ricossa
The article Francesco Ricossa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No evidence of notability; only a very few google hits, and a couple of minor quotes showing up in google news archives.
While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TallNapoleon (talk) 08:55, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Geert Jan Stuyver for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Geert Jan Stuyver is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Geert Jan Stuyver until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. The-Pope (talk) 13:36, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Lakhumal Hiranand Hiranandani for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lakhumal Hiranand Hiranandani is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Lakhumal Hiranand Hiranandani until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Cheers AKS 08:09, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Navin Hiranandani for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Navin Hiranandani is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Navin Hiranandani (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Cheers AKS 07:30, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of William J. Morgan (Sedevacantist)
The article William J. Morgan (Sedevacantist) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No evidence of WP:NOTABILITY
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 16:09, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of User:Dharmadhyaksha/Lakhumal Hiranand Hiranandani
A tag has been placed on User:Dharmadhyaksha/Lakhumal Hiranand Hiranandani requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done for the following reason:
Article now created at Lakhumal Hiranand Hiranandani by someoneUnder the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:32, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
"Catholic Resistance" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Catholic Resistance and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 7#Catholic Resistance until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 22:00, 7 August 2022 (UTC)