| Revision as of 18:17, 6 October 2006 editElalan (talk | contribs)1,334 edits →Tamilnet← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 08:47, 25 August 2022 edit undoSudharsansn (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,134 edits Deleting page due to misuseTag: Blanking | ||
| (240 intermediate revisions by 78 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == VP Page == | |||
| Hi Sudharsansn, Let me know whats your plan of action. I guess there is a lot to be done. It would certainly be a good idea to protect the page, but that would also prevent anyone from editing except through the admins. ] 02:59, 4 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == vandalism == | |||
| However bad you may think the ] article is, sticking a speedy delete tag on it is not the right approach. It makes you the vandal and is liable to get you blocked. -- ] 01:29, 5 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Dear Roger, you might want to go through the history of that page to understand what I literally mean, when I say 'vandalism'. Pls refer to ], the talk page and the article history and also the points being made there. | |||
| :While every effort is being made to ensure that the other version stays as it is, why is effort to balance this article, inspite of several edits being negated due to mass reverts? That's my whole point!! Why is a pro-Sinhala mafia thwarting every attempt to balance this article, inspite of several cited reasons behind Alred Durairaj, Child killer mentions, it always reverts back to the original Anti-Tamil, Pro-Sinhala version. I put up the vandalized tag to clearly suggest that every effort made to ensure NPOV is being negated. Any suggestions?? | |||
| :What do you think should be done about that article. Thanks for your mention ] 02:02, 5 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Just a Suggestion== | |||
| I've looked at some of your comments on LTTE related pages, and though I could not agree more with your overall message that there are some Pro-Sinhala and obviously biased statements in those pages, your posts in the talk pages are very emotional and border on all out flaming of that certain group. | |||
| So just a suggestion that you might want to reframe from calling them names because it depreciates your solid arguements about the article | |||
| Thanks Mate --] 08:35, 5 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Welcome to the India project== | |||
| <div style="border: 2px solid #484898; background: #FFF; background-color:#E2E7FF; padding: 1ex 1ex 1ex 1.5ex; margin: 0px 0px 1em 1em; font-size: 90%"> | |||
| <div style="border-bottom: 2px dotted #484898">'''Welcome!'''</div> | |||
| ] | |||
| Hi, and welcome to the ]! We're a group of editors working to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of India. | |||
| A few features that you might find helpful: | |||
| * Please participate in any of our ] that might interest you. | |||
| * The project has a ]; it will normally be delivered as a link, but ] are available. | |||
| There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like: | |||
| * Want to know how good our articles are? The ] is working on rating the quality of every India article in Misplaced Pages. | |||
| * Can you code? The ] uses automated and semi-automated methods to perform batch tasks that would be tedious to do manually. | |||
| If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! <font color="navy">] (])</font> 02:23, 5 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| == Tamilnet == | |||
| You might want to see what is happening at the ] page. Your suggestions with regards to this content dispute would be helpful. ] 18:15, 6 October 2006 (UTC) | |||