Misplaced Pages

User talk:Aitias/archive 9: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User talk:Aitias Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:52, 19 July 2009 editAitias (talk | contribs)Rollbackers50,076 edits →Thanks!: resp.← Previous edit Latest revision as of 10:53, 28 October 2022 edit undoDatGuy (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators39,851 editsm Removed protection from "User talk:Aitias/archive 9": No need for protection, unprotecting to allow lint errors to be fixed. Requested at WP:RFPP 
(9 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{/tph}} {{tmbox
| image = ]

| text =
== Deletion of Jeffrey Brent Ball and Todd Ray Wilson ==
This is an ''']''' of past discussions. '''Do not edit the contents of this page.''' If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the ].<!-- Template:Talkarchive -->

}}
Hello Aitias,

I created these pages on 24 May and you deleted them on 4 June following a discussion leading to their deletion primarily on the basis of the One Event policy. I can see the sense in merging them into one article, such as "The assassinations of Elders Jeffrey Brent Ball and Todd Ray Wilson in La Paz, Bolivia on May 24, 1989," though that title seems a bit lengthy. You probably don't want to deal with the debate, so would you either restore the articles so I can continue working on them, or tell me to create a new article such as the one I suggested in accordance with the consensus of the discussion.

Thank you,
Ryan Reeder
] (]) 03:21, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

== Thanks ==

Thanks for unblocking me. As it seems I have no right to revert anything, according to some in here, even if it is vandalism. Thanks, ] (]) 12:52, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

== There is such a thing as "no consensus" ==

FYI, per ]: Three Keep votes to two Delete votes is not a consensus to Keep. Each side had arguments, and people argued against claims made by the other side. There was nothing like a consensus to keep. I wish people wouldn't be so quick to act like their own votes are some super consensus overruling what everyone else said. ] (]) 17:34, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

:We do not count votes when closing deletion debates — we weigh arguments. In this particular case there clearly was a general consensus to keep the article. Though, if you feel that I have interpreted the consensus incorrectly you are free to ]. Regards, —&nbsp;]<span style="color: #999;">&nbsp;//&nbsp;</span>] 23:01, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

==RfA thanks==
{| class="messagebox standard-talk" style="border: 5px solid #0050b2; background-color: #2486ff;"
|align="left"|]
|align="center"|Thank you for participating in ], which succeeded with '''56 in support''', '''12 in opposition''' and '''3 neutral votes'''. I am truly honored by the trust that the community has placed in me. Whether you supported me, opposed me, or if you only posted questions or commented om my RfA, I thank you for your input and I will be looking at the reasons that people opposed me so I can improve in those areas :). If you ever need anything please feel free to ask me and I would be happy to help you :). All the Best, ] (]) <!-- this thank-you created with Template:RfA-thanks -->
|}
] (]) 23:36, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

== Vandalism to Antandrus ==

Hi, I may have been a bit hasty but I blocked ] following further vandalism after your 4im warning. If you are still on could you check what I did was correct as I am new at this. Thanks, ] ] 22:30, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
:] comment - looks fine to me. Anons harassing users shouldn't be given quarter. –<font face="verdana" color="black">]</font>] 22:33, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
:{{ec}} In my book your block was not a hasty, but a good one. :) Best wishes, —&nbsp;]<span style="color: #999;">&nbsp;//&nbsp;</span>] 22:37, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
::Thanks both of you. I just thought I'd be safe and check as it was my first block. Best wishes, ] ] 22:39, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
:::You're welcome! :) —&nbsp;]<span style="color: #999;">&nbsp;//&nbsp;</span>] 22:43, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

::::Thanks guys. This particular kid has been harassing me for almost a year now. He's mad because I busted some sneaky vandalism he managed to keep in an article for more than a month -- and then I smoked out all the other sneaky crap he did. Sometimes you just gotta laugh ... I find it more amusing than anything else. Cheers, ] ] 22:48, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

:::::Yea, when I see someone "undoing" an edit to restore harassment, I pretty much think an immediate block is in order (but starting with a 4im is appropriate as well, if you don't want to be ultra-rouge). It's clear what their intentions are. –<font face="verdana" color="black">]</font>] 22:52, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

== ] - serial recidivist ==

* Look at:
* Admire persistence
* Block?
&mdash; ''Charles Stewart'' <small>]</small> 16:13, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

== Thank you ==

Thank you very much Aitias. Not only for your support in my RfA, but also for your assistance in keeping things calm and rational. Your help, support, faith, and trust in me is something I value greatly. Thank you! — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>]</b> : ]</span></small> 21:47, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

:You're very welcome. :) I'm glad you are an admin now. Congratulations! —&nbsp;]<span style="color: #999;">&nbsp;//&nbsp;</span>] 18:29, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

==Odin5000==

I noticed that you commented on this editor's topic-banning by J.delanoy. You may wish to see what he's posted at ]. -- ] (]) 17:36, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

:Hey. Just to make this plain, I did ''at no time'' question J.delanoy's actions, I ''just'' asked out of curiosity (I am not familiar with this topic). Best wishes, —&nbsp;]<span style="color: #999;">&nbsp;//&nbsp;</span>] 18:27, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

== Honduran problems ==
Shouldn't ] and ] be semi-protected as well? ] (]) 23:47, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

:Hey. Please request page protections ]. Regards, —&nbsp;]<span style="color: #999;">&nbsp;//&nbsp;</span>] 23:50, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

== RFC: socionics ==


http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Socionics ] (]) 19:38, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

== A *very* late follow-up to ] ==

I've updated the script to use the semi-new API interface for automatic actions. Though I never found out exactly what caused some of the errors you reported, I am strongly inclined to say that they have been fixed in this update. —] <small>(])</small> 20:49, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

== Simon Tatham's Portable Puzzle Collection deletion ==

I noticed that this article got deleted because it was proposed for 5 days without any objection (quite some time ago). I think that it should be restored so that the discussion can be reopened.
] (]) 23:27, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

== Whoops ==

Sorry, I did not know whether I should list that worry of mine at Incidents or the normal noticeboard, but thank you, I guess, for er, archiving it. ''']'''] 22:56, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

:You're welcome; I agree that ] would be a better place, though, perhaps ] is the best one. :) Howsoever, ], at least, is just for issues which require immediate administrative attention, thus I thought marking it as resolved is the best thing to do; I hope it did not appear to harsh to you. :) Best wishes, —&nbsp;]<span style="color: #999;">&nbsp;//&nbsp;</span>] 23:07, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

::Aitias, I like "Best wishes, —&nbsp;<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>". I write "Have a nice day" after finishing my post. Now I think I should switch to "Best wishes, —&nbsp;<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>". :-) ] (]) 08:42, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

== WMC at WQA ==

Hi, do you think the subthread ] at WQA should be moved to the ANI thread that you initiated? --] 22:46, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

:I am, to be honest, not quite familiar with the WQA board; but, at a first glance, it appears like a good idea to me. Best, —&nbsp;]<span style="color: #999;">&nbsp;//&nbsp;</span>] 23:06, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
::Thank you for the answer, but I decide to let the thread there as it is since WMC has refused to fix the problem that he caused but made personal attacks against me - How typical. His block of Badagnani is not about 3RR violation but he saw the WQA issue on Badagnani.--] 23:23, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

== Thanks! ==

Thank you. --] (]) 00:35, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

:You're welcome. :) —&nbsp;]<span style="color: #999;">&nbsp;//&nbsp;</span>] 00:52, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 10:53, 28 October 2022

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.