| Revision as of 06:17, 1 July 2008 editElonka (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators70,959 edits →Alternate account of blocked user: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 12:24, 10 November 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Removed stale messages from inactive IP talkpage. (Task 13)Tags: AWB Replaced | ||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Blanked IP talk}} | |||
| ==b. & h. hip hop== | |||
| Why remove the artists? Do you know them not to be notable? ] (]) 04:42, 20 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Yes i do. A band is not considered notable enough to go on a wikipedia band list unless it has its own article. This does '''not''' mean that simply creating an article for every band gives them notability, they still have to demonstrate notability on their articles--] (]) 12:11, 20 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::You can't assume they aren't notable just because no one has written articles for them. ] (]) 00:11, 21 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::You're right, but until someone does write an article for them, an article which demonstrates notability, we can't know they are notable, therefore we don't include links to non-existent articles. Plus they look untidy, and if we allow a few, eventually there will be billions of red links all over wikipedia--] (]) 00:15, 21 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ''i replied that editors have constructed the guideline ] to deal with this.'' | |||
| == I was obviously confused when making that summary == | |||
| and must have confused you with someone else. Your talk page does not show any warnings, either received or removed. In fact, I can't figure out who, what other IP, I might have confused you with. So, doubly confused. I offer you my apologies. | |||
| Separately, the topic of user talk warnings is very difficult. For example, last night (much later) another user kept deleting warnings to them, and other editors/admins did not 'notice' the warnings extending into the previous day. Everyone is supposed to look and notice patterns of abuse as seen in history, but we get lazy and just give one look. | |||
| And I have done just what the advice says, and archived old warnings and discussions when they would only serve to embarrass the IP/user. But... that is best useful ''after'' the problems have stopped. | |||
| Again, apologies. Goofs like this, realized, keep me checking what I'm doing. ] (]) 17:32, 22 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Alternate account of blocked user == | |||
| ==Alternate account of blocked user== | |||
| It appears this IP, among others, has been used by {{user|86.44.16.82}}, currently blocked for disruption. --]]] 06:17, 1 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 12:24, 10 November 2022
Unregistered editors using this IP address received messages on this talk page years ago. Since users of the IP address have likely changed, these messages have been removed. They can be viewed in the page history.