| Revision as of 20:32, 15 October 2007 editAlkivar (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users14,533 edits →AGNPH: respond← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 18:10, 3 December 2022 edit undoSteel1943 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors196,777 edits Notification: listing of Molotov Cocktail (shot) at WP:Redirects for discussion.Tag: Twinkle | ||
| (308 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ] | |||
| {| align="center" width="90%" style="background: #e1e1e1; border: 2px solid orange;" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="5" | |||
| {{nobots}} | |||
| |- | |||
| |bgcolor="orange" colspan="2"|<font size="4" color="white">'''Food for thought:'''</font> | |||
| |- | |||
| |align="center" style="background: white; border:1px solid orange" width="50%"| | |||
| ''' by ].''' | |||
| |align="center" style="background: white; border:1px solid orange" width="50%"| | |||
| ''' by ].''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |align="center" style="background: white; border:1px solid orange" width="50%"| | |||
| '''] by ].''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="background: white; border:1px solid orange" width="50%" colspan="2"| | |||
| <p align="center">'''<font size="5">"...We make the Internet not suck."</font>'''</p> | |||
| <p align="right"><font size="4">— Jimbo "POV Pusher" Wales</font></p> | |||
| |- | |||
| |bgcolor="orange" colspan="2"|<font size="4" color="white">'''To do:'''</font> | |||
| |- | |||
| |align="left" style="background: white; border:1px solid orange" valign="top"| | |||
| :'''Articles to ] (]) / ]:''' | |||
| :: | |||
| :Nothing here for the moment | |||
| |align="left" style="background: white; border:1px solid orange" valign="top"| | |||
| :'''Articles to beef up:''' | |||
| : | |||
| :Nothing here for the moment | |||
| |- | |||
| |}<br/> | |||
| I'm not back, but I do promise to check my talk page at least every couple months... ]] <span style="font-size:130%; background:yellow; border:1px solid black;">☢</span> 17:54, 19 September 2015 (UTC) | |||
| {| class="Talk-Notice" | |||
| == File:Phrozen crew.jpg listed for discussion == | |||
| |] | |||
| ] A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw --> ] (]) 02:40, 9 November 2022 (UTC) | |||
| |This user is a part of the ''']''', which aims to expand Misplaced Pages's coverage of military history. If you would like to participate, you should visit the ], where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. | |||
| == "Molotov Cocktail (shot)" listed at ] == | |||
| |} | |||
| ] | |||
| An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect ] and has thus listed it ]. This discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 18:10, 3 December 2022 (UTC) | |||
| {| class="Talk-Notice" | |||
| |align="center"|] | |||
| |align="center"|''This user is member of ''']''', an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to beers and breweries on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, visit the ], where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.'' | |||
| |} | |||
| {{TOCright}} | |||
| =ARCHIVED= | |||
| ==== | |||
| ] | |||
| I'd be willing to scan just about all of the NASA stuff if it's really only 500 pages or so. Do you want me to send it back when I am done? I was thinking some of the documents might be better OCR'd and converted to wikitext articles, if they are predominantly textual. My scanner can scan up to legal size. For anything larger, I have a hand scanner that scans a path 4 inches wide, can stitch those scans together for larger images. please delete my email address when you are done with it. ] 17:54, 2004 Oct 16 (UTC) | |||
| : pages are in the mail you should recieve them soon. ] 04:18, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC) | |||
| The package of NASA material has arrived. It appears to have survived the trip well. I haven't opened it yet, will try to start tonight.] 22:34, 2004 Oct 26 (UTC) | |||
| I'm stuck for a bit on scanning, the computer the scanner is connected to has had the RAM removed, I'm waiting to get it back from Kingston. They received it on the 22nd of November, so I expect it back in a matter of days. ] 07:23, 2004 Nov 29 (UTC) | |||
| OK, I have the scanner running, trying to figure out the OCR thing. I uploaded this one file for test purposes. I'd like to convert this kind of thing to wikitext rather than keep them as jpgs, cause they get pretty big. If you know of any resources to help me figure out optical character recognition, I'd be grateful. ] 22:12, 2004 Dec 29 (UTC) | |||
| :all right, I have worked a bit at it,and looks like I'm started. The front page for the archive, at present is ] 06:55, 2004 Dec 30 (UTC) | |||
| ::EXCELLENT! ] 01:24, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC) | |||
| You been doing any more with those NASA Facts papers? Sorta curious as I havent heard anything in a while. ALKIVAR™ 01:02, 16 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :yes, I have taken a break on that, I'm working on getting a faster scanner, but I will definitely follow through on the whole pile. I'm really busy these days so faster is really gooder... gotta run, let me know when you get back from your break. ] 02:18, 27 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :: ... seems to be missing, but I don't know why. They've moved a lot of stuff from wikisource to en.wikisource, but some it is missing. I've been real busy, haven't worked on it in like a year? ] 05:33, 9 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==A quick note to say ''thanks''== | |||
| ] I just wanted to drop you a quick note to thank you for your support in my ''request for adminship''. It was certainly a wild ride, and I really appreciate you taking some time out to contribute. ] 16:26, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC) | |||
| == Thanks for your work on the Jew template == | |||
| I know it's a bit frustrating now, but in the end I think it's going to be vastly improved, and most of the credit goes to you. ] | ] 02:54, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Nice work, and thanks == | |||
| ]], award you this barnstar for your innovation and initiative in the creation of the ]]] | |||
| I just wanted to thank you for coming up with the idea for the ], which evolved into the finest (and in my opinion highest) award that we have here at the 'pedia. | |||
| Oh, and by the way (for what it's worth) I ''like'' your orange sig ''and'' the associate image. It adds a bit of flavor to sometimes bland pages. – ]] 14:07, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==Defender of the Wiki Barnstar citation== | |||
| Kudos on inventing the ]. Since I think defense of Misplaced Pages is extremely important, I've edited the DOTWB page to include their citations and supporting evidence. In fact, the only award I can't find supporting evidence for is... um... yours. Could you link it in when you get the chance? Thanks! ] 00:45, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :I dont have one... I never self award. :) ]™] 01:07, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Steve Dalkowski == | |||
| Thank you for your FAC support and for updating the table, looks good! Is it Hardcore ''dance'' music you're into or that horrible Hardcore Rap stuff they play on MTV? There's very, VERY few of us hardcore dance music fans in the US :) ] 18:39, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==Colditz Castle== | |||
| Impressive work on the Colditz Castle. I enjoyed reading the article. ] 20:39, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :Your quite welcome :) ]]] 20:41, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Signature == | |||
| Thanks for voting in my RfA - but please don't use images in signatures! They are unnecessary server load. See ]. ] <sup>]</sup> June 30, 2005 20:28 (UTC) (reply here) | |||
| : What are the size restrictions for signatures, anyhow? I've been considering using one myself. —] (]) 1 July 2005 01:20 (UTC) | |||
| :For the record i've had this conversation with the dev's ... the image is on commons, not on the en server. The server load is therefore negligible. Or at least thats the conclusion we came to. As for the other reasons listed, it neither interferes with line height nor blinks... I think you worry too much :) ]]] 1 July 2005 06:45 (UTC) | |||
| :: Well, I trust the devs. OK then. ] <sup>]</sup> July 1, 2005 07:07 (UTC) | |||
| == User page improvements == | |||
| LOL! Thank you for "improving" my ]. <font size=-2>— ] (])</font> 01:17, 8 October 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Van Impe == | |||
| Your addition of audio to the ] article rocks my world. - <font color=black>]</font> <font color=darkgreen size=1>]</font> 03:04, 11 October 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ] ] ) 05:34, 28 October 2005 (UTC)]] | |||
| == You have been nominated == | |||
| You have made a positive impact on Misplaced Pages, and I firmly believe sysop privileges would only enhance your contribution abilities. If you do not mind, ]. Please see ] should you wish to accept, as there have been some changes to the RFA process as of late. Best regards, ] 22:42, 31 October 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Nice work! == | |||
| Hey, dude. Just wanted to say that I really enjoyed reading ]. Nice job, and keep up the good work!--]|]] 04:46, 5 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Wikimania 2006 == | |||
| Firstly, enjoy your Wikibreak; come back clear-headed and ready to edit! Second, I noticed you live in New England, and are a DJ (awesome!), and wondered if you've heard of ], which is happening right here in our fair city of Boston. I know it's a few hours' drive from where you are, but if you could participate in IRC chats, or volunteer to help with Wikimania, we'd really appreciate it. I enjoy working with you, and look forward to seeing you in the future. Happy wikibreak, ]]]] 02:44, 23 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :<small>P.S. I love the userpage!</small> 02:44, 23 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==St. John's College High School== | |||
| Fantastic work on the ] article, it looks wonderful! ] 21:37, 1 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==Images== | |||
| Thank you for the additions of pictures of the Bendix and Thompson tropies! ]<sup>]</sup> 13:09, 28 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :I dispute your unsourced assertion that you ever sit on your "lazy ass"! If you expect such controversial claims to remain unchallenged, you should not use such a recognizable sig! No one even has to check your contribs to see that is a deliberately false and misleading statement. I am deeply disappointed in you for attempting to push this unsupported minority POV. ]<sup>]</sup> 13:17, 28 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Thanks == | |||
| Thanks for fixing my ugly user page! I really appreciate it. I had tried to make it look nice, but I just couldn't figure it out! Thanks!] 19:51, 29 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==ALF, now with added ALF== | |||
| ] | |||
| Here's a barnstar for converting me to ascii and HTML they are fantastic, thanks. I spent three hours this week trying to find just an ascii version, so I am delighted to have these in user space. Big smile on my face now, thanks. --] <sup><font color="green">]</font></sup> 11:31, 6 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ] to reflect FU an 'unofficial' barnstar --] ] 23:35, 11 January 2006 (UTC)]] | |||
| == Love ] == | |||
| Funny shit, I wish I still had one of the posters (the one with a swashbuckling floppy) that they sent out to universities during that campaign so I could up it to commons. Also, excellent work on the many aspects of warez (it's refreshing to see well written articles by people who have a clue). Nice userpage, too, 'cept the whole spiel about being conservative ;-P (at least you aren't a GWB fanboy). --] 18:48, 31 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| <br clear=left> | |||
| == Image:Alkivar-003-TWEAKED.jpg == | |||
| I have a question about the above mentioned picture. You state it was taken by Utopium Photography, yet you claim to be the copyright holder. If this picture was not taken by you, but you are the subject the photographer has to release the copyright to you. Just like wedding photos, the married couple do not hold any copyrights, or infact any rights to the photos. ] <sub>(] ])</sub> ] 23:30, 12 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Dude... you have absolutely no idea what the hell your talking about. In the US, works for hire cannot be registered for copyright by the creator. See : | |||
| ::Under the 1976 Copyright Act as amended (title 17 of the United States Code), a work is protected by copyright from the time it is created in a fixed form. In other words, when a work is written down or otherwise set into tangible form, the copyright immediately becomes the property of the author who created it. Only the author or those deriving their rights from the author can rightfully claim copyright. | |||
| ::Although the general rule is that the person who creates a work is the author of that work, there is an exception to that principle: the copyright law defines a category of works called “works made for hire.” '''If a work is “made for hire,” the employer, and not the employee, is considered the author. The employer may be a firm, an organization, or an individual.''' | |||
| :Note the section in bold. Nuff said. ]]] 19:27, 14 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Cool == | |||
| Cool userpage you've got! ] 01:17, 16 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :I must compliment you on your excellent userpage. Kudos to your creativity :) I am inspired. <span style="border:2px solid green;padding:2px;">]</span>06:32, 10 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Paul Oakenfold == | |||
| I agree that the way I worded it, it sounded like he mixed his own records. I sat there for a few minutes trying to peice together a sentence that would be both grammatically correct and convey the correct message. "'''Not only''' did Oakenfold produce records, '''but''' he '''also''' mixed them." A few too many modifiers. The words '''but''' and '''also''' are both redundant but without them the sentence is screwed. Perhaps, "Oakenfold even mixed the records he produced for others" or something of the ilk? ]<font face="verdana" style="font-size: 9pt;"> - ]</font> 02:05, 18 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :By the way, wonderful userpage. Did you develop it or did you copmod a template? ]<font face="verdana" style="font-size: 9pt;"> - ]</font> 02:06, 18 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::I subst'd some of the templates... and modified them to match the theme (the GFDL only and the Userpage templates) the rest I developed by hand. I'd be glad to give you any help you need developing one of your own if you'd like. ]]] 21:47, 18 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == young orphaned images == | |||
| I think you were the one who asked a little while ago for a report of young orphaned images? it is. Let me know if any tweaks are needed. --] 23:02, 23 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Gorgeous Userpage! == | |||
| Yours is the nicest userpage I've seen, in browsing several hundred. Nice work! ] 10:19, 5 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Excellent User Page Award == | |||
| ]</font><font color="blue">]</font>]<font color="red">]</font> 22:45, 3 August 2006 (UTC)]] | |||
| == Any chance of some help? == | |||
| I'm a bit disapointed by ], it was under glass, no lighting, so the flash is a problem, I tried to photoshop out as much as I could but I wondered if you had a program that could level out the background white as it gets real grey away from the centre. pretty please? :) --] <sup><font color="green">]</font></sup> 22:19, 14 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :I did my best to level out the flash, I also corrected the angular distortion so the frame around the sketch looks square now. I also reduced it to greyscale as color needlessly increased the file size for this image. If this is not what you wanted feel free to revert my changes. ]]] 22:53, 14 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::You run a fast and efficient ship there Alkivar :) I've just been appreciating it high res and zoomed in, that's a great improvement. Thanks. --] <sup><font color="green">]</font></sup> 23:14, 14 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Esperanza User Page Award == | |||
| <div style="border: 2px solid green; padding: 1em"> | |||
| ] | |||
| Congratulations, Alkivar, you have been nominated for the ]! The judges have received the fifteen entries, and are ready to start judging. The judges will take a week to complete the judging process, and they will contact all the participants when the judging is done. | |||
| Please drop by the ] for contest updates and questions. Take care, and good luck! '''] <sup>] · ] ]</sup>''' 09:41, 31 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| == WikiLove! == | |||
| <div style="float:center;border-style:solid;border-color:blue;background-color:AliceBlue;border-width:1px;text-align:left;padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">] | |||
| Here's a ] for you! Chocolate bars somehow promote ] and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving something friendly to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Make your own message to spread WikiLove to others using Template:]! Happy editing! --''']<big>Φ</big>]''' 08:47, 4 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| Get it? A chocolate ''bar'' for Alki''var''? Anyhow, keep up the great work, you've contributed a lot to Misplaced Pages. :D <small>(another ackward attempt at comedy by ''']<big>Φ</big>]'''</small>)</small> | |||
| :Thats such a dorky joke... but it made me smile ... thanks for the thought. ]] <span style="font-size:130%; background:yellow; border:1px solid black;">☢</span> 18:42, 5 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Barnstar== | |||
| ]This '''motivated''' barnstar is given to '''Alkivar''' for his creation of the ]. An excellent reference and a fine addition to the encyclopedia . Presented by ] 26 November 2006]] | |||
| A well deserved barnstar for you, for your creation of the ]. It helped me get rid of some red links on my own pet project...]. Cheers--] 10:25, 26 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Barnstar== | |||
| ], award you this barnstar for your continued improvement of Misplaced Pages]] | |||
| Been meaning to give you one of these for a while now. I think I have agreed with you on 99% of every Misplaced Pages discussion we have both participated in, even on the really controversial ones that I am often in the minority of. It's good to know someone else in the project shares my views on so many topics. ] 04:34, 30 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == For doing the right thing == | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid {{{border|gray}}}; background-color: {{{color|#fdffe7}}};" | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Original Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For doing the right thing despite the pitchfork wielding mob. (] ? (]) 14:22, 18 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| == There are people that talk the talk... == | |||
| ] - '']'' - ] 10:23, 14 August 2007 (UTC)]] | |||
| ...And there are people that walk the walk. I don't give out Barnstars, I give out this thing, and on rather rare occasions at that. Thank you, for standing up, and for doing the right thing. . --] - '']'' - ] 10:23, 14 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==The Surreal Barnstar== | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid {{{border|gray}}}; background-color: {{{color|#fdffe7}}};" | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | <center>'''The Surreal Barnstar'''</center> | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Without your ], the ] would never have received enough community input to decide the fate of that seven year old project. As the nominator of that MfD and for playing a significant roll in prompting 113 unique editors to participate in that MfD, I hereby award you The Surreal Barnstar. -- <font face="Kristen ITC">''']''' <sup>''(])''</sup></font> 07:04, 28 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| =RECENT= | |||
| <div style="padding:5px; margin:5px; border:2px solid #F00; background-color:#FC8;"> | |||
| ]'''Please note:''' Comments left by anonymous editors may be removed without warning. Please ] if you wish to engage in a meaningful discussion. | |||
| </div> | |||
| ==]== | |||
| Dear {{pagename}}, you have been listed as a party in an ]. Please click ]. Regards, ]<sup>]]]<span class="plainlinks"></span></sup> 21:37, 9 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| I thought that images were allowable for lists of characters. The page in question is an article that just happens to have "list of" in front of it. None of the characters on that page have their own pages and the images all illustrated what was described in the section. -- ]<sup>]</sup> 23:33, 11 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :The images are used solely to identify the subject, which is against our policy for fair use. See ] Entry #8: ''Significance. Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. '''Non-free media files are not used if they can be replaced by text that serves a similar function'''.'' '''emphasis mine''' hope this clears it up. ]] <span style="font-size:130%; background:yellow; border:1px solid black;">☢</span> 23:58, 11 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::If I removed half of the images, could we keep 5-10 images with rationale? I've seen several FAs with at least five fair use images. If this were agreeable, I would do my best to implement this on all of the Simpsons character pages. Would this be acceptable? -- ]<sup>]</sup> 00:02, 12 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| {{smile|xDanielx}} | |||
| ] for ] the generic notability tests. — <span style="font:bold 11px Arial;display:inline;border:#000066 1px solid;background-color:#ECF1F7;padding:0 4px 0 4px;">]</span> <sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 04:22, 13 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Fight Club == | |||
| Why did you delete the images without discussion? I don't appreciate your brusque conduct in removing them. —] (] • ]) - 17:37, 14 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :The images existed under the criteria found in #5 of ]: "'''Film and television screen shots:''' For critical commentary and discussion of the cinema and television." —] (] • ]) - 17:39, 14 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::And failed ] criterion #8. ]] <span style="font-size:130%; background:yellow; border:1px solid black;">☢</span> 18:16, 14 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::How does your judgment call supercede discussion about the appropriateness of fair use rationales for non-free images? Why did you conduct yourself in a unilateral manner rather than initiate discussion or bring the issue to ]? Your behavior is brusque and unfavorable to actually working with editors in shaping consensus about how non-free images could be better implemented. Please explain your behavior in light of other options. —] (] • ]) - 18:21, 14 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::I think it would have been more productive to have perhaps first listed these images on WP Films as potential deletes; it would allow the community to have reviewed the situation and perhaps even improved the articles by integrating the images more cohesively and clearly as a part of critical commentary. ] 18:45, 14 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Can you please review the non-free images at ] and report if you think the two non-poster images have sufficient fair use rationales? I'd like to get an idea from an admin like you what would be appropriate for inclusion. —] (] • ]) - 22:39, 14 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Based on context only, the first image is more for a "group photo" than for critical/analyisis use within the article body text. The gold spacesuit image has more validity based on context. The fair use rationales appear to address all 10 items of NFCC so the rationales are good, except for response to item 8. Based on my experience as an admin, the first would fail because it incorrectly states its significance (a picture isnt needed to show that theres a diverse racial mix in the casting). The spacesuit image would survive imo. ]] <span style="font-size:130%; background:yellow; border:1px solid black;">☢</span> 23:40, 14 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Also, I've added other non-free images that have solid fair use rationales to ]. Can you please review them and give me your feedback as to if they are appropriate or not? —] (] • ]) - 23:36, 14 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::Will take a look at those in a bit. ]] <span style="font-size:130%; background:yellow; border:1px solid black;">☢</span> 23:40, 14 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::OK took a look at the new images in ]. All of these appear to have acceptable context, actual analysis of the image, and valid fair use rationales. These would all avoid deletion from me. You may wish to get a second opinion as i'm one of the more lenient admins when it comes to fair use. But as far as I'm concerned those are acceptable. ]] <span style="font-size:130%; background:yellow; border:1px solid black;">☢</span> 00:08, 15 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Why wouldn't the image be appropriate under #5 of ], which says: "'''Film and television screen shots:''' For critical commentary and discussion of the cinema and television." The latter is apart from "critical commentary", and there is plenty of context discussing the diversity of the cast in this piece of cinema. How would "discussion of the cinema and television" apply as opposed to the "critical commentary" of a prominent set design or a prominent costume design? —] (] • ]) - 23:46, 14 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::My opinion is that there is no need to provide a photo to show that there is a racial mix, it adds nothing of value that text cannot and does add potential problems as do all non free content. The gold suit on the other hand adds significant information, because words cannot accurately portray to quote the article "visual influences from science fiction films in space by Andrei Tarkovsky (Solaris in 1972), Stanley Kubrick (2001: A Space Odyssey in 1968), and Ridley Scott (Alien in 1979)." as these sources are very different in visual feel, its harder to picture what is written in textual form. In contrast with the fact that just about everyone by now should know what an asian or indian or brazilian looks like. ]] <span style="font-size:130%; background:yellow; border:1px solid black;">☢</span> 00:08, 15 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Block of ]== | |||
| Could you explain your block of this user? It appears s/he uploaded several images without source information, but wasn't given the appropriate time to rectify the situation before you blocked him/her. As the template on the images states, a user should be given 7 days or a minimum of 48 hours after being notified. You deleted all the images within hours of them being tagged, then blocked the user without warning. Please reconsider, as I don't believe policy supports this block. - ] ] 17:43, 15 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Looking at your deletion logs, it seems you are completely ignoring the standard process, deleting dozens of images within hours of being tagged. Please stop, and give editors the appropriate time they are allowed before deleting their uploads. Further, I have reversed your block of {{user|G2bambino}} as unjustified. - ] ] 18:10, 15 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::This is not the first time this user has been admonished for improper image use. Uploaded images w/o copyright license data, several without sources, several without fair use rationales... the block was for repeated violations. See user's talk page, and its archives, you will note several infractions prior. ]] <span style="font-size:130%; background:yellow; border:1px solid black;">☢</span> 18:13, 15 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::I am speechless, and completely disgusted that you have chosen to wheel war over this block. Despicable. - ] ] 19:34, 15 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::I strongly suggest you unblock ASAP, especially considering your conduct is currently about to go to arbitration. This reblock is completely out of order. ] 19:37, 15 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::I have taken then to AN/I, I strongly suggest you comment at the board. ] 19:43, 15 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == AGNPH == | |||
| What were the other accounts this guy used? Was wondering so I could add the appropriate tags, if appropriate ... ]] 20:19, 15 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Don't have names, user implied he had other accounts see and realize this was the account's 5th edit (none of which were to any userpages). Based on contribs there is no doubt this is a sockpuppet... its just a question of who's. ]] <span style="font-size:130%; background:yellow; border:1px solid black;">☢</span> 20:32, 15 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 18:10, 3 December 2022
I'm not back, but I do promise to check my talk page at least every couple months... ALKIVAR™ ☢ 17:54, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
File:Phrozen crew.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Phrozen crew.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. EnPassant♟♙ (talk) 02:40, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
"Molotov Cocktail (shot)" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Molotov Cocktail (shot) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 3#Molotov Cocktail (shot) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 18:10, 3 December 2022 (UTC)