| Revision as of 03:55, 23 September 2007 edit82.95.56.216 (talk) classic guitar← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 07:55, 21 December 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Removed stale messages from inactive IP talkpage. (Task 13)Tags: AWB Replaced | ||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Blanked IP talk}} | |||
| == (Anesthesia) Pulling Teeth == | |||
| Removing a Prod template isn't strictly vandalism. It demonstrates that someone objects to the deletion of the article, so I've listed it at AfD to get a broader cross-section of the community looking at it. ] - ] 03:05, 23 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :It' wasn't so much the temp rm... it was the little rant added in that was pushing it. BTW, any track that isn't a single shouldn't have an article(for the most part). Heavy metal albums, in particular, have nn songs up the wahoo linked off of them. The bulk should just be re-directed. I am a staunch anon. I rejected my user account(after rolling over 21000 edits with it) for the purity of anonymous editing. If I were a logged user... I would be supporting, by vote, all of your recent AfD's. Good Luck! ] 03:16, 23 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Fair point. I took the addition as being a different way of removing the prod template with a reason (as opposed to putting it in the edit summary), but I guess it can be taken however. Thanks for the support, too. I think this is going to be a long-term activity, getting rid of a lot of nn songs. ] - ] 03:27, 23 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::You may meet with a lot of criticism, especially from the "metal" contributors. Heavy metal and all its related articles seem to bring out the worst in "crufty fanboyism" from a lot of editors... even those who are veteran Wiki contributors. Even, gasp!, an admin here and there can fall prey to the "let's fanpage it" disease. I respect your attempts to try and put the "pedia" back into "Wiki". ] 03:34, 23 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::I expect to, frankly. That's why I started relatively small with the non-singles on Iron Maiden's latest album, which I felt would be a bit less objectionable than a "classic". Given that someone pointed out that Metallica have articles on pretty much every song...well, I could hardly say no, could I? ] - ] 03:41, 23 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Classic Guitar == | |||
| Please see http://en.wikipedia.org/Guitar#Acoustic_guitars, where the same statement about the 'Classic Guitar' is present. | |||
Latest revision as of 07:55, 21 December 2022
Unregistered editors using this IP address received messages on this talk page years ago. Since users of the IP address have likely changed, these messages have been removed. They can be viewed in the page history.