| Revision as of 01:02, 18 March 2005 editMax rspct (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users11,122 editsm →Uploaded Image← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 04:20, 1 January 2023 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,293,709 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:InShaneee/Archive/Apr/2022, User talk:InShaneee/Archive/Jan/2022) (bot | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
| ==]== | |||
| |minthreadsleft = 3 | |||
| Hi there. About the ] article: I thought I had done enough looking around for a water hardness article, but who would have thought to look in the most obvious place (], Duh!). I'll work on merging the articles. Which title do you think is better: Hard water or Water hardness? --] 16:00, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC) | |||
| |algo = old(14d) | |||
| *I'd suggest keeping the name hard water, firstly because that's how most people know it as (IMHO), and secondly because it seems to describe the broader topic, while water hardness sounds like a measure of hard water itself. --] 16:07, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC) | |||
| |archive = User talk:InShaneee/Archive/%(monthnameshort)s/%(year)d | |||
| }} | |||
| {{Archives | |||
| |collapsed=yes | |||
| |bot=MiszaBot_III}} | |||
| . | |||
| == Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity == | |||
| ==]== | |||
| About ]: the "they" vs. "it" controversy when referring to musical groups seems to be a regional variation: ]. To call it "improper grammar" is a little misleading. -] 09:07, Jan 27, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| *Interesting...I don't think I've ever encountered that before. In that case, I apologize for the accusation. That said, do you happen to know if there's any sort of standard for dealing with this on wikipedia, or does this just tend to happen? --] 15:11, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==Stub Flood== | |||
| Just a question, and please, don't take this the wrong way, but are you planning to go back and expand on the NES stubs you've been putting up recently? I really like your drive, and it's a cool project, I just hope we'll have some nice beefy articles at some point. And crap, this isn't meant to be condecending, I really couldn't figure a better way to word this. --] 04:39, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :It's actually more of an ] thing.. I spontaneously felt like I had to include all games in my old collection. Maybe I will go back and expand some of them later. Why don't you work on some that you're familiar with? ] 04:43, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ::Count on it! NES forevah! --] 04:46, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==my signature== | |||
| ] | |||
| I'm not sure I want my signature in the public domain, unless it's a username sig. Can you please point me to it so that I can check, thanks, ] 20:10, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Established ] provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to the required activity level before the beginning of January 2023. | |||
| *Yeah, it is, sorry. You can find it ]. --] 19:30, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC) | |||
| **Thanks, pubdom is fine, ] | |||
| Inactive administrators are encouraged to engage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for re-engaging with the project are available at ]. If you do not intend to re-engage with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at ]. | |||
| ==]== | |||
| Please remove your post of IP addresses from this article http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/John_Driscoll | |||
| as they are inappropriate. ] | |||
| *Actually, everyone's supposed to sign their comments. Since those comments were made by an anon user, that was all I had to fill in. If you ARE that anon user, you should look into changing over the attributions. --] 15:28, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC) | |||
| *I've noticed you found my livejournal, and have been threatening legal action on it. If you'd simply look up wikipedia's policies, you'd see that IPs must be used in place of usernames for unregistered users. It is also NOT an invasion of privacy, since wikipedia logs IPs of unregistered users. If that's not your cup of tea, you shouldn't be here. --] 16:53, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC) | |||
| *As far as I know we're in our right to put in the IPs of unregistered users for archiving purposes. It's completely useless to try and remove them anyway, as each edit remains in the history anyway, and you can't remove the edits you made earlier because of the GFDL. ]|] 08:51, Mar 10, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Thank you for your past contributions to the project. <!-- Template:Inactive admin 2 -->— ] 08:48, 1 October 2022 (UTC) | |||
| == Rachael McArthur == | |||
| == Imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity == | |||
| I've speedied Rachael McArthur, as requested. Why did you later want this not speeedied? ] 17:02, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC) | |||
| *Honestly, I can't remember the article, or removing a speedy. Sorry. Little curious now, though, but let it drop if you don't think it's a big deal, which I doubt it was. --] 02:27, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Prison education == | |||
| ] | |||
| Hello! I hope that you'll find my replacement of the (obviously unacceptable) content of the article enough of an improvement ro consider changing your vote. ] (] 17:12, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Established ] provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to the required activity level before the beginning of January 2023. | |||
| *While I usually don't approve of drastic rewrites to a page under voting, you obviously caught this one early on in the game, and now, thanks to you, we've got a right nice article. Kudos, and good job to you, sir! --] 02:23, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks — I'd never done it before, and I'm not quite sure what prompted me to do it this time. Still, all's well that ends well. ] (] 11:16, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Inactive administrators are encouraged to engage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for re-engaging with the project are available at ]. If you do not intend to re-engage with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at ]. | |||
| Since you obviously don't have a problem with the subject as such but rather had a problem with the previous content it would have been better to list it on ] rather than on vfd. —{{User:Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason/Sig}} 06:25, 2005 Mar 16 (UTC) | |||
| *Well, I honestly didn't think at the time that an acceptable article could be made out of it, since the current topic was just original research and the title seemed to lend it self just to POV ranting. Mel just plesantly surprised me in that respect. Thanks for the advice anyway, though. --] 15:33, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Thank you for your past contributions to the project. <!-- Template:Inactive admin 2 -->— ] 00:58, 1 December 2022 (UTC) | |||
| ==Uploaded Image== | |||
| Sorry I'm slow in replying . The photo of myself is the main one on my userpage. i wouldn't mind having a contact me tag >> next up from fair use??. I couldn't find the tag on wikipedia specialpages .. Maybe you can apply it for me on the original. Is your project out to tag specific photos? | |||
| == Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity == | |||
| Cheers - ] 01:01, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| Established ] provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions have been removed. | |||
| Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at ]. | |||
| Thank you for your past contributions to the project. <!-- Template:Inactive admin 2 -->— ] <sup>]</sup> 02:47, 1 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 04:20, 1 January 2023
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Click here to start a new talk section.
Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to the required activity level before the beginning of January 2023.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to engage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for re-engaging with the project are available at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to re-engage with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 08:48, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
Imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to the required activity level before the beginning of January 2023.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to engage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for re-engaging with the project are available at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to re-engage with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:58, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions have been removed.
Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at WP:BN.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — xaosflux 02:47, 1 January 2023 (UTC)