| Revision as of 20:26, 20 April 2005 edit¸ (talk | contribs)18 edits Vandalism← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 04:20, 1 January 2023 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,293,709 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:InShaneee/Archive/Apr/2022, User talk:InShaneee/Archive/Jan/2022) (bot | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
| ==]== | |||
| |minthreadsleft = 3 | |||
| Hi there. About the ] article: I thought I had done enough looking around for a water hardness article, but who would have thought to look in the most obvious place (], Duh!). I'll work on merging the articles. Which title do you think is better: Hard water or Water hardness? --] 16:00, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC) | |||
| |algo = old(14d) | |||
| *I'd suggest keeping the name hard water, firstly because that's how most people know it as (IMHO), and secondly because it seems to describe the broader topic, while water hardness sounds like a measure of hard water itself. --] 16:07, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC) | |||
| |archive = User talk:InShaneee/Archive/%(monthnameshort)s/%(year)d | |||
| }} | |||
| {{Archives | |||
| |collapsed=yes | |||
| |bot=MiszaBot_III}} | |||
| . | |||
| == Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity == | |||
| ==my signature== | |||
| I'm not sure I want my signature in the public domain, unless it's a username sig. Can you please point me to it so that I can check, thanks, ] 20:10, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC) | |||
| *Yeah, it is, sorry. You can find it ]. --] 19:30, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC) | |||
| **Thanks, pubdom is fine, ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ==]== | |||
| Established ] provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to the required activity level before the beginning of January 2023. | |||
| Please remove your post of IP addresses from this article http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/John_Driscoll | |||
| as they are inappropriate. ] | |||
| *Actually, everyone's supposed to sign their comments. Since those comments were made by an anon user, that was all I had to fill in. If you ARE that anon user, you should look into changing over the attributions. --] 15:28, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC) | |||
| *I've noticed you found my livejournal, and have been threatening legal action on it. If you'd simply look up wikipedia's policies, you'd see that IPs must be used in place of usernames for unregistered users. It is also NOT an invasion of privacy, since wikipedia logs IPs of unregistered users. If that's not your cup of tea, you shouldn't be here. --] 16:53, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC) | |||
| *As far as I know we're in our right to put in the IPs of unregistered users for archiving purposes. It's completely useless to try and remove them anyway, as each edit remains in the history anyway, and you can't remove the edits you made earlier because of the GFDL. ]|] 08:51, Mar 10, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Inactive administrators are encouraged to engage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for re-engaging with the project are available at ]. If you do not intend to re-engage with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at ]. | |||
| == Prison education == | |||
| Thank you for your past contributions to the project. <!-- Template:Inactive admin 2 -->— ] 08:48, 1 October 2022 (UTC) | |||
| Hello! I hope that you'll find my replacement of the (obviously unacceptable) content of the article enough of an improvement ro consider changing your vote. ] (] 17:12, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC) | |||
| *While I usually don't approve of drastic rewrites to a page under voting, you obviously caught this one early on in the game, and now, thanks to you, we've got a right nice article. Kudos, and good job to you, sir! --] 02:23, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks — I'd never done it before, and I'm not quite sure what prompted me to do it this time. Still, all's well that ends well. ] (] 11:16, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity == | |||
| Since you obviously don't have a problem with the subject as such but rather had a problem with the previous content it would have been better to list it on ] rather than on vfd. —{{User:Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason/Sig}} 06:25, 2005 Mar 16 (UTC) | |||
| *Well, I honestly didn't think at the time that an acceptable article could be made out of it, since the current topic was just original research and the title seemed to lend it self just to POV ranting. Mel just plesantly surprised me in that respect. Thanks for the advice anyway, though. --] 15:33, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==Uploaded Image== | |||
| Sorry I'm slow in replying . The photo of myself is the main one on my userpage. i wouldn't mind having a contact me tag >> next up from fair use??. I couldn't find the tag on wikipedia specialpages .. Maybe you can apply it for me on the original. Is your project out to tag specific photos? | |||
| Cheers - ] 01:01, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC) | |||
| *Hm....perhaps ] or ]? I'm actually fairly new at this, so I'm not sure which one would be best. No, I'm not targeting anything specific as such, just the ones I know what to do with. --] 02:44, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| ==]== | |||
| Established ] provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to the required activity level before the beginning of January 2023. | |||
| Be careful. Other sites mirror our content, so when you come across that, it's not a copyvio. ] 22:59, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC) | |||
| *Sorry. However, on ], the site I reffered to had no info about attrobution. Should that be listed somewhere for further action? --] 23:02, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC) | |||
| **They are supposed to attribute it, yes, but I think a lot of them don't and nothing is really done about it. ] 23:07, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Inactive administrators are encouraged to engage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for re-engaging with the project are available at ]. If you do not intend to re-engage with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at ]. | |||
| ==Toasty image== | |||
| You mentioned that a Toasty image is currently an orphan, but it is not; it's actually linked from the Toasty article. It always has been. Thanks for the message, though! ] 05:12, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Thank you for your past contributions to the project. <!-- Template:Inactive admin 2 -->— ] 00:58, 1 December 2022 (UTC) | |||
| ... I take it back. I just fixed it. God, I'm such an idiot. Thanks for pointing it out. ] 05:19, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity == | |||
| ==Good work== | |||
| ] | |||
| You caught ] literally seconds after it was posted; good job!—] 15:01, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Established ] provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions have been removed. | |||
| *Thanks! That's what happens when trolling the 'Recent Changes' page is your idea of fun. :) --] 15:03, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at ]. | |||
| == RC == | |||
| Thanks! I have to give all the credit to my cable connection, though. :) – ]] 04:15, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC) | |||
| : I have to tell you though: my real pleasure is in finding copyvio pages. In fact, I just made a new template to drop on the pages of clueless newcomers that don't know not to copy and paste web pages: ]. What do you think? – ]] 04:19, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :: I'm glad you like it! It just seemed appropriate because I kept posting the same, "Gee, Mr. Newcomer, we really can't use that here" messages. You know, ] and all. – ]] 18:55, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Thank you for your past contributions to the project. <!-- Template:Inactive admin 2 -->— ] <sup>]</sup> 02:47, 1 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == Kappa? == | |||
| Hi there! I haven't had problems with Kappa in the past, it's just that we tend to have radically divergent opinions. But he is someone who votes on reasoning rather than blindly on principle, and that's always valuable. Nevertheless, I'll take a look at this RfC. ]]] 18:51, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| *I disagree with your RFC. You don't have a valid point against Kappa, and you shouldn't have posted the so-called evidence of my so-called dispute with Kappa without asking me first. ]]] 07:30, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| =="Cruft" and RfC == | |||
| I think your RfC is a bit hasty, but it's helped me to see how my votes are perceived by people. I will endeavor to make my reasoning clearer, especially to Vfd newbies. ] 12:35, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==What ] project is not== | |||
| *This is not suggesting a hierarcal system. | |||
| *It will be used only by users who want to use it. | |||
| *Only ranking will be assigend to users who want to use it. | |||
| *The idea ment to make it like barn stars, but based on regular contribution. | |||
| *It is currently a prototype, likely that it is nothing like the final version. | |||
| I urge you to reconsider your vote based on this clarification. Thanks --] ] 08:45, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| I'm not sure why this was marked for speedy deletion. The nearest that I could get was (as per the discussion page) that it's thought to be a vanity article, but that's not grounds for speedying. If you want, you can put it up for VfD. ] (] 10:32, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Vandalism == | |||
| You have been blocked from editing because of , which is total vandalism. ] ] 20:26, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 04:20, 1 January 2023
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Click here to start a new talk section.
Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to the required activity level before the beginning of January 2023.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to engage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for re-engaging with the project are available at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to re-engage with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 08:48, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
Imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to the required activity level before the beginning of January 2023.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to engage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for re-engaging with the project are available at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to re-engage with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:58, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions have been removed.
Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at WP:BN.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — xaosflux 02:47, 1 January 2023 (UTC)