| Revision as of 19:30, 8 June 2013 editKoavf (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,174,994 edits →References: per CfD using AWB← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 19:04, 5 January 2023 edit undoAngusWOOF (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers224,352 edits add R with history | ||
| (35 intermediate revisions by 20 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #REDIRECT ] {{R with history}} | |||
| In ], '''xin''' refers to one's "disposition" or "feeling". Literally, ''xin'' refers to the physical heart, though it is sometimes translated as "mind" as the ancient Chinese believed the heart was the center of human ]. For this reason, it is also sometimes translated as "heart-mind". It has a connotation of intention, yet can be used to refer to long-term goals.<ref>Shun, Kwong Loi, "Mencius", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2010 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2010/entries/mencius/></ref> ], the important early ] thinker, considered ''xin'' to be cultivated during one's life, in contrast to innate qualities of '']'', or human nature.<ref>Robins, Dan, "Xunzi", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/xunzi/></ref> | |||
| A ] view, specifically from the philosopher ], understands ''xin'' as being socialized, with environmental pressures influencing personal intentions, sometimes in such a way that can provoke disagreements and conflict. While a Confucian might take heart that ''xin'' may be cultivated in order to develop '']'', or moral virtue, Zhuangzi considered this socialization as detrimental to one's personal nature, somewhat along the lines of the later French philosopher, ]. However, unlike Rousseau, ] and many other ]-era European philosophers following the classical example of ], emotion and reason were not considered separate entities, but rather as coextensive; ''xin'' itself is a concept that is as much cognitive as emotional.<ref>Hansen, Chad, "Taoism", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2012 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2012/entries/taoism/></ref><ref>Ivanhoe, P.J., & Van Norden, B.W. (Eds.) (2001). Readings in Classical Chinese Philosophy, 2nd Ed. Hackett Publishing Co.: Indianapolis, p. 393</ref> | |||
| ==See also== | |||
| *'']'', a related concept | |||
| *], a modern scientific hypothesis linking emotion and reason | |||
| ==References== | |||
| {{Reflist}} | |||
| {{Chinese philosophy}} | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
Latest revision as of 19:04, 5 January 2023
Redirect to:
- With history: This is a redirect from a page containing substantive page history. This page is kept as a redirect to preserve its former content and attributions. Please do not remove the tag that generates this text (unless the need to recreate content on this page has been demonstrated), nor delete this page.
- This template should not be used for redirects having some edit history but no meaningful content in their previous versions, nor for redirects created as a result of a page merge (use {{R from merge}} instead), nor for redirects from a title that forms a historic part of Misplaced Pages (use {{R with old history}} instead).