| Revision as of 01:22, 14 May 2011 editGoodDay (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers492,997 edits →unblock: I'll assume that Barong, won't use this account anymore← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 20:34, 6 January 2023 edit undoSteel1943 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors196,777 edits Notification: listing of Bigun at WP:Redirects for discussion.Tag: Twinkle | ||
| (42 intermediate revisions by 23 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| This user's current account is; | |||
| If I've misunderstood what was expected, people should feel free to reverse my block.—](]) 02:18, 26 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :The account has been globally locked by a steward. ] (]) 02:23, 26 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ::*I'm sory Risker, I can'r be doing with all this; you are just going to have to go and find him, I need him to sort out my IT problems. No imediate hurry, first thing tomorrow morning will be fine. One despairs, one really does. ] ] 21:06, 26 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
| {{softredirect|User:Br'er Rabbit}} ; ) | |||
| Jack, whaa? <span style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:80%;">'''/]]]'''</span> 21:25, 27 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ==MfD nomination of ]== | |||
| :Wow, this really sucks. :( ] (]) 21:18, 28 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ], a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ] and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of ] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> ] (]) 23:41, 16 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ==MfD nomination of ]== | |||
| ], a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ] and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of ] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> ] (]) 23:45, 16 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ==MfD nomination of ]== | |||
| ], a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ] and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of ] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> ] (]) 23:47, 16 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ==MfD nomination of ]== | |||
| ], a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ] and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of ] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> ] (]) 23:47, 16 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ==MfD nomination of ]== | |||
| ], a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ] and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of ] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> ] (]) 23:59, 16 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination for deletion of Template:Blenheim Palace overhead1 == | |||
| ]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ] (]) 18:50, 22 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| == Help == | |||
| <blockquote>This isn't even about mobile payments in Indonesia, it's about a particular vendor of credit for mobile phones and the services they offer. Said vendor fails ] due to ] in ], ] sources. Its products fail the ] and the ] on the same basis.</blockquote> | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| Need help with my User Page. I see you're blocked. Contact me off wiki if you get this <b class="nounderlines" style="border:1px solid #999;background:#fff"><span style="font-family:papyrus,serif">]]</span></b> 01:53, 8 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> '''<span style="font-family: Arial">] ]</span>''' 11:37, 22 February 2019 (UTC) | |||
| * +missing notification ;) | |||
| ] 03:50, 8 May 2011 (UTC) | |||
| : Did you know for how long the editor is banned, sadly? - Lovely edit notice, no? --] (]) 11:55, 22 February 2019 (UTC) | |||
| == trolling == | |||
| {{User QAIbox | |||
| trolling: {{diff|User talk:Jack Merridew|428504313|428035461|1}} {{diff|User talk:Jack Merridew|428504478|428504453|2}} {{diff|User talk:Jack Merridew|428504486|428504478|3}} {{diff|User talk:Jack Merridew|428504521|428504486|4}} | |||
| | title = Awesome | |||
| | image = Cscr-featured.svg | |||
| | image_upright = 0.35 | |||
| Byte me, grawp/b-tards. ] 05:44, 11 May 2011 (UTC) | |||
| | bold = ] | |||
| }} | |||
| == unblock == | |||
| --] (]) 06:30, 20 October 2020 (UTC) | |||
| == "Bigun" listed at ] == | |||
| {{unblock declined|1=<p>This account was scuttled (email-blanked, the password scrambled). The password that was exposed in now-oversighted edits is not what I finally scrambled it to, so there is no danger of it being taken control of via that exposed password. The account is now ], thus the blocks here, and on commons, are not necessary.</p><p>What purpose does this block thus serve? hint: it's fostering confusion and amounts to a badge of shame. This is all part of the toxicity that besets this site. It's score keeping.</p>|decline=You're not the blocked user and as such unblock requests will be ignored. Sorry. ] 09:05, 11 May 2011 (UTC)}} | |||
| ] | |||
| An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect ] and has thus listed it ]. This discussion will occur at {{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 6#Bigun}} until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 20:34, 6 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
| --] 08:33, 11 May 2011 (UTC) | |||
| {{unblock reviewed | 1=Yes, I am. Ask any arb or CU. This is not in doubt. | accept=Since everyone knows you're you, and the SUL lock prevents editing from this account, and unblocking a scrambled account does no harm anyway, and the block seems to be causing you distress, I've unblocked this account. ] (]) 10:32, 11 May 2011 (UTC)}} | |||
| --] 09:09, 11 May 2011 (UTC) | |||
| You say that any checkuser should be able to verify it, but I've not had any emails in 2011 that contain the string "Jack Merridew" and checkuser indicates that you appear to have moved across the world since you lasted edited through this account. However, based on the other technical data that's available, it does seem quite likely that you are who you say you are. --] ] 09:59, 11 May 2011 (UTC) | |||
| : The CU-list should have gotten a clarification from the CU on the other end of that trip (a 24h flight;) Anyway, see ] for a bunch of folks not doubting this. This was not an ac-level block and so an unblock should not need to be at that level, either. And from a tech data level, I'm using a few more user agents but the same laptop. Iz me ;) ] 10:08, 11 May 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ::Both the strings "Merridew" and "Barong" return no results for this year, with the latter returning no results at all. I'm subscribed to both the checkuser and functionaries lists so if something was sent to them, I would have got it. But no matter, as my opinion is that the technical evidence supports your claim. Someone else will have to evaluate your unblock request though, as I prefer not to act as both an admin and a checkuser in the same case where possible. --] ] 10:13, 11 May 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ::: I guess the CU-list was ''not'' notified. But thanks for asserting that you believe me. This account is only days old. Mentioned on arbcom-l, tho. ''Terima Kasih'' | |||
| ::: I suggest that any admin not familiar with all this mess leave it be for one who is. Fox is unknown to me, and is presumably unfamiliar with the years long history, so I'm not surprised at the above decline. | |||
| ::: ] 10:23, 11 May 2011 (UTC) (see also ] | |||
| Thank you, Floquenbeam. One less stinking badge ;) I'm going to point at this for a commons unblock request. ] 10:37, 11 May 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :You're welcome. My mitzvah for the day. --] (]) 10:43, 11 May 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :: ;) have a read of ] sometime; it clarifies things. I've made the requests on Commons, btw. ] 11:13, 11 May 2011 (UTC) | |||
| Barong, just to get this straight: you posted the supposed password to the Jack Merridew account with the intention to get it blocked a while back, and now you start this unblock request with the complaint that this block is "part of the toxicity that besets this site"? You can't have it both ways. ] 17:32, 13 May 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :There is no ambiguity here; the account needed unblocking as trollish people were using the fact that the account was blocked as ammunition against Barong: "Oh, it's that fucking Jack Merridew; isn't he blocked? isn't he ''banned''?" That sort of thing. Please {{diff|Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification|428898123|428893625|read this post}} for more information. --] <sup>(])</sup> 18:14, 13 May 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :: I don't mind the unblock. My point was: This block was triggered by Barong, intentionally and deliberately. Barong wanted the account blocked. I do not approve the wording in the unblock request claiming that the block existed as a badge of shame, score keeping, or to fuel a toxic environment – assuming I didn't miss prior discussion about the block, none of this is true. ] 19:13, 13 May 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :::I really can't explain it any better than the link I already provided, in which the user explains it himself, and the brief statement I already made. There have been volumes of material written about this matter lately, and it would not surprise me to learn you had indeed not read all the discussions, as your perception of what is true differs from Barong's. --] <sup>(])</sup> 20:04, 13 May 2011 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 20:34, 6 January 2023
This user's current account is;
User:Br'er Rabbit
This page is a soft redirect. ; )
MfD nomination of User:Jack Merridew/Blood and Roses
User:Jack Merridew/Blood and Roses, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jack Merridew/Blood and Roses (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Jack Merridew/Blood and Roses during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 23:41, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
MfD nomination of User:Jack Merridew/Unencyclopaedic
User:Jack Merridew/Unencyclopaedic, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jack Merridew/Unencyclopaedic and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Jack Merridew/Unencyclopaedic during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 23:45, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
MfD nomination of User:Jack Merridew/Body text
User:Jack Merridew/Body text, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jack Merridew/Body text and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Jack Merridew/Body text during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 23:47, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
MfD nomination of User:Jack Merridew/Quote switch
User:Jack Merridew/Quote switch, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jack Merridew/Quote switch and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Jack Merridew/Quote switch during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 23:47, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
MfD nomination of User:Jack Merridew/Quotes
User:Jack Merridew/Quotes, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jack Merridew/Quotes and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Jack Merridew/Quotes during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 23:59, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Blenheim Palace overhead1
Template:Blenheim Palace overhead1 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 18:50, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Mobile payments in Indonesia
The article Mobile payments in Indonesia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This isn't even about mobile payments in Indonesia, it's about a particular vendor of credit for mobile phones and the services they offer. Said vendor fails corporate notability guidelines due to insufficient depth of coverage in independent, reliable sources. Its products fail the product notability guidelines and the general notability guideline on the same basis.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SITH (talk) 11:37, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
- Did you know for how long the editor is banned, sadly? - Lovely edit notice, no? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:55, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
 | |
| Ten years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:30, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
"Bigun" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Bigun and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 6 § Bigun until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 20:34, 6 January 2023 (UTC)