Revision as of 15:58, 12 April 2022 editBryanrutherford0 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers31,189 edits Delisted Good Topic← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:45, 23 January 2023 edit undoHog Farm (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators55,439 edits →Description and sourcing: new sectionTag: New topicNext edit → | ||
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
] (]) 19:27, 9 May 2018 (UTC) | ] (]) 19:27, 9 May 2018 (UTC) | ||
== Description and sourcing == | |||
See and ], where it has been suggested that a more detail description of ship characteristics would be helpful, as well as using some of the vast literature on the ''Iowa'' class to reduce the reliance on DANFS. Hopefully this one can avoid FAR. ] <sub> '']''</sub> 15:45, 23 January 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:45, 23 January 2023
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the USS New Jersey (BB-62) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
USS New Jersey (BB-62) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Misplaced Pages community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page as Today's featured article on October 15, 2008. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
view · edit Frequently asked questions I added something to the article but it got removed. Why? In all probability, what you added was unsourced information or information cited to an unreliable source; such information is usually removed quickly because of the article's Featured Status. Featured Articles on Misplaced Pages require reliable sources for an independent verification of the facts presented, consequently any information added to a Featured Article without a reliable source is subject to removal from the article at any Wikipedian's discretion. I see information in the article that has no source. What should I do? This sources used in this article are cited at the end of each paragraph (known on Misplaced Pages as "per paragraph citation") so a check of the numbered note at the end of the paragraph should provide the source for the information. If this does not work, then add {{cn}} to the suspicious information to draw attention to information that may not be cited by a source. Alternatively, you may add reliable sources to the uncited information by using ref tabs (<ref></ref>). If you do add a source to the article consider using one of the citation template(s) to ensure that you add all necessary information from your source to the article. The entire article makes reference to the ship as "she", shouldn't the battleship be referenced as "it"? This is an issue that has come up repeatedly, and the consensus of the editors for the Military history WikiProject and its contributors is that ship articles on Misplaced Pages may use an all "she/her" format or an all "it" format, but the article may not alternate between the two forms of reference. The primary source of U.S. ship articles is the Dictionary of American Naval Fighting Ships (DANFS), which refers to all ships as "she" or "her"; as a result, is it easier for some members to simply carry that format through the rest of the article. Something in the lead section doesn't have a footnote. I'm going to put a {{fact}} tag on it right now. This article (like many others) uses the approach of putting no citations in the lead section. This is because everything in the lead is also found in the body of the article along with its citation, as the lead functions as a summary of the entire article. I added pop culture reference(s) to this article, but they were removed. Why? The pop culture reference(s) were removed in accordance with the Military history project's guidelines governing the inclusion of popular culture material in military history articles. Although we are aware that the Iowa-class battleships have appeared in a number of books, games, and movies, a conscience decision was made to eliminate all pop cultural references from the individual battleships articles and consolidate them into a single section in the Iowa-class battleship article. Before adding an pop culture reference to the class article though you should read the FAQ located on the Iowa-class battleship talk page and the hidden note located in the pop culture section on the class page, both of which outline very specific guidelines for the inclusion of pop culture material. This article is long! Yes, it is. In part due to its length, general and specific characteristics have been split: general information on the class history can be found on the article Iowa class battleship, info on the weapons used by the battleship can be found at Armament of the Iowa class battleship, and the history of each ship can be found on that ship's individual page. |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Re-commission vs. 2nd commission
There is a debate over which term should be used, and since this article uses one of those terms please read and comment at --> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/Talk:USS_Iowa_(BB-61)
A 10 fireplane (talk) 19:27, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Description and sourcing
See this discussion and Misplaced Pages:Featured article review/USS Missouri (BB-63)/archive1, where it has been suggested that a more detail description of ship characteristics would be helpful, as well as using some of the vast literature on the Iowa class to reduce the reliance on DANFS. Hopefully this one can avoid FAR. Hog Farm Talk 15:45, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Categories:- Misplaced Pages featured articles
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once
- All unassessed articles
- FA-Class Operation Majestic Titan articles
- Operation Majestic Titan articles
- FA-Class Operation Majestic Titan (Phase I) articles
- Operation Majestic Titan (Phase I) articles
- FA-Class military history articles
- FA-Class maritime warfare articles
- Maritime warfare task force articles
- FA-Class military memorials and cemeteries articles
- Military memorials and cemeteries task force articles
- FA-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- FA-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- FA-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles
- FA-Class Cold War articles
- Cold War task force articles
- FA-Class Ships articles
- All WikiProject Ships pages
- FA-Class Pennsylvania articles
- High-importance Pennsylvania articles
- FA-Class National Register of Historic Places articles
- Low-importance National Register of Historic Places articles
- FA-Class National Register of Historic Places articles of Low-importance
- FA-Class New Jersey articles
- Mid-importance New Jersey articles
- WikiProject New Jersey articles
- FA-Class Vietnam articles
- Mid-importance Vietnam articles
- All WikiProject Vietnam pages
- FA-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- FA-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- United States articles used on portals
- WikiProject United States articles