Revision as of 07:14, 9 March 2007 editGimmeBot (talk | contribs)Bots75,273 editsm GimmeBot updating {{ArticleHistory}}← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:48, 9 March 2007 edit undoSandyGeorgia (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Mass message senders, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors278,959 edits class=faNext edit → | ||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
|1={{CCOTM}} | |1={{CCOTM}} | ||
|2={{CWC Advert}} | |2={{CWC Advert}} | ||
|3={{WP Cricket|class= |
|3={{WP Cricket|class=FA|importance=mid}} | ||
|4={{WPBiography|living=yes|class=FA|importance=}} | |4={{WPBiography|living=yes|class=FA|importance=}} | ||
|5={{WP India|class= |
|5={{WP India|class=FA|importance=|punjab=yes|past-collaboration=week of ]]}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 07:48, 9 March 2007
Harbhajan Singh is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Misplaced Pages community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |
Template:CCOTM |
CCOTM
Can we get started? not much time left before the world cup.--Thugchildz 03:01, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- Also are we going to have a peer review or just start without one? Well i think we need to have a peer review--Thugchildz 03:04, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
I did it up to the end of 2005. Only one more year of chronology to go, and then we only need the quotes and pundit reaction. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 08:09, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
Do you think listing of MoM & MoS awards will add value? If so - i can volunteer for the same -- Kalyan 14:30 26 February 2007
- I guess Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Harbhajan Singh may answer the question. If so, I'd be grateful if you could help. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 07:56, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Question
>> Nevertheless, he has the highest average amongst current players batting in the No. 4 position.
What is this stat ? From what I can find, he has never batted at No.4 in Tests and was out for 1 on the only occasion in ODIs Tintin 03:38, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
Under performer
- nowadays the performance of harbhajan singh is not up to the mark. Before deleting the segment of article , it is expected to discuss pros and cons . saravan_p 5th March
Language too informal
Yeah, his performance isn't up to the mark, but your grammar & language is not the way to make edits. You are welcome to make the edits if your language is correct
Srikeit 05:55, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
- Nowadays his performance level has been diminishing considerably. He is struggling to get his rhythm right. He was severely punished by Shahid Afrid in the recent tour of Pakistan. Not penetrative in bowling as one in against Australia in 2001. In many of his recent outings, he is simply playing wicketless. With the performance against Australia in hand, he is surviving in the Indian cricket team squad.
But a very minor change I have made, as to meet the Misplaced Pages's standard, we have to write in unusual way. There is also one more Misplaced Pages in simple English, where we can use simple phrases and words. I feel nothing wrong in the changes I have made in the initial article. Srikeit, why can't you edit the same article with same stuff in your own language, as you have agreed the essence of the matter which we are investigating.
saravan_p 18:00 IST 5th march 2006
"Subsequent"
There are still seven "subsequent"s left in the article; they do jar somewhat. --Dweller 10:15, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Categories: