Misplaced Pages

User talk:Furious Style: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:23, 16 July 2021 editMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2)Tag: AWB← Previous edit Latest revision as of 21:07, 23 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
Line 59: Line 59:
I have restored the article at your request in order for improvements to be made. While you are of course correct in your assertion that being an army general will normally confer notability, the article failed to state that he was one.--]] 14:36, 3 April 2013 (UTC) I have restored the article at your request in order for improvements to be made. While you are of course correct in your assertion that being an army general will normally confer notability, the article failed to state that he was one.--]] 14:36, 3 April 2013 (UTC)


'''Thanks for contesting the deletion at ] and leading to the article's revival.''' I hadn't mentioned he was a General, as I found no credible sources (there were a few Palestinian blogs with disputable POV), although I had mentioned he was a senior figure associated with the ] and had contested the deletion on grounds that more information would be forthcoming as he was associated with an ongoing event. -- <span style="border:1px solid #FF8C00;p1pxadding:;background:#668B66;">](])</span> 07:58, 4 April 2013 (UTC) '''Thanks for contesting the deletion at ] and leading to the article's revival.''' I hadn't mentioned he was a General, as I found no credible sources (there were a few Palestinian blogs with disputable POV), although I had mentioned he was a senior figure associated with the ] and had contested the deletion on grounds that more information would be forthcoming as he was associated with an ongoing event. -- <span style="border:1px solid #FF8C00;p1pxadding:;background:#668B66;">](])</span> 07:58, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 21:07, 23 February 2023

Welcome!

Hello, Furious Style, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! DThomsen8 (talk) 13:39, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

January 2013

Hello, I'm Charlesdrakew. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Toll road, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Charles (talk) 09:39, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Bush tax cuts. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 22:32, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

You're an asshole. Furious Style (talk) 04:08, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Harlem shake (meme)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Harlem shake (meme) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  Velella    23:24, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Real funny, Furious Style (talk) 23:42, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we are requesting your participation to help find a resolution. The thread is "Talk:Wasteland 2#Game_Camera_View".

Guide for participants

If you wish to open a DR/N filing, click the "Request dispute resolution" button below this guide or go to Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution noticeboard/request for an easy to follow, step by step request form.

What this noticeboard is:
  • It is an early step to resolve content disputes after talk page discussions have stalled. If it's something we can't help you with, or is too complex to resolve here, our volunteers will point you in the right direction.
What this noticeboard is not:
  • It is not a place to deal with the behavior of other editors. We deal with disputes about article content, not disputes about user conduct.
  • It is not a place to discuss disputes that are already under discussion at other dispute resolution forums.
  • It is not a substitute for the talk pages: the dispute must have been discussed extensively on a talk page (not just through edit summaries) before resorting to DRN.
  • It is not a court with judges or arbitrators that issue binding decisions: we focus on resolving disputes through consensus, compromise, and explanation of policy.
Things to remember:
  • Discussions should be civil, calm, concise, neutral, and objective. Comment only about the article's content, not the other editors. Participants who go off-topic or become uncivil may be asked to leave the discussion.
  • Let the other editors know about the discussion by posting {{subst:drn-notice}} on their user talk page.
  • Sign and date your posts with four tildes "~~~~".
  • If you ever need any help, ask one of our volunteers, who will help you as best as they can. You may also wish to read through the FAQ page located here and on the DR/N talkpage.

Please take a moment to review the simple guide and join the discussion. Thank you! EarwigBot  19:08, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Maysara Abu Hamdiya

I have restored the article at your request in order for improvements to be made. While you are of course correct in your assertion that being an army general will normally confer notability, the article failed to state that he was one.--Anthony Bradbury 14:36, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for contesting the deletion at Maysara Abu Hamdiya and leading to the article's revival. I hadn't mentioned he was a General, as I found no credible sources (there were a few Palestinian blogs with disputable POV), although I had mentioned he was a senior figure associated with the Palestinian Authority and had contested the deletion on grounds that more information would be forthcoming as he was associated with an ongoing event. -- FrancisPontifex(talk) 07:58, 4 April 2013 (UTC)