Revision as of 01:17, 26 April 2008 editNsaum75 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers11,869 editsm →School pics!: yup yup← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 03:30, 25 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talkarchive}} | |||
{{Archive box|image=] | |||
|{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis | |||
|archiveprefix=User talk:Nsaum75 Commons/Archives/ | |||
|format=Y/F | |||
|age=500 | |||
|index=yes | |||
}} | |||
}} | |||
== Syrian town depopulation - allegations of "ethnic cleansing" == | |||
==School pics!== | |||
I love your pic of O'Connell! If you get the chance, do you mind getting a shot of Ball High School? It would be awesome! ] (]) 21:15, 25 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Syrian_towns_and_villages_depopulated_in_the_Arab-Israeli_conflict#Ethnic_cleansing | |||
* EDIT: Someone else got another shot.. but if you want you can take more photos and upload them. ] (]) 21:17, 25 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
You argued against this page once, any chance of budging this stupid see also link? I don't know if I have the right arguments. Cheers <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 22:37, 31 October 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
::I tried taking several photos of BHS similar to O'Connell's, but settled on the panoramic photo because it showed the "new" and "old" wing. I'll go by and take a new photo of the entrance in the next few days, and post it further down in the article...A pic is needed that clearly shows the name of the school. Sound good?? --] (]) 01:17, 26 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
== hello friend! == | |||
I have posted new pictures on my blog :D how are you doing? saludos!!!] (]) 02:24, 1 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Quick thanks == | |||
As a courtesy: thanks for signing my post (d'oh...) ] (]) 01:00, 7 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
==Notice== | |||
If you continue to disrupt and make broad attacks against editors, as you have done at the PI Arbitration discussion, you may find yourself blocked or reported for disruptive behavior. You are not doing your side any favors. Consider yourself put on notice. ] (]) 18:41, 10 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
:Sockpuppet much? This kind of underhanded behavior is exactly why I stopped editing IP articles or contributing photos to things in the middle east. --]<sup>]</sup> 18:43, 10 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
Really now? It seems like your comments there are being ignored and an admin even castigated you for your disruptive comments after it was decided Prop 3 was the consensus winner. I think you would be best served if you chose to edit somewhere where you can keep your POV in check. Just friendly advice. ] (]) 01:22, 11 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
== complete == | |||
Yes, we are done with WP. They are now working on their semester projects which will be presentations. I will get back to tidying some of the articles up later, when the semester is done. Thanks!] (]) 15:25, 11 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Ahmed Yassin == | |||
Hello, | |||
You reverted an edit from an IP address to ] that had added the phrase "and the spiritual leader" to a seemingly hidden part of a reference. You called the edit "vandalism". If you are correct, it is vandalism of an unusually subtle variety. Can you elaborate on this, so that I can understand this sort of thing better? Thank you very much. ] (]) 19:15, 13 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
:Reversion was based not on the spirituality addition, but on the blanking of the entire section on alleged terrorist attacks that was sourced. If you the page, you will see it. --]<sup>[[User talk:nsaum75|<span lang="he" xml:lang="he" dir="rtl">¡שיחת!</span>&lr</sup> | |||
::Thank you. Sorry for being a bit slow. ] (]) 23:17, 13 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
:::No problem. Happens to the best of us. Have a good weekend!. --]<sup>]</sup> 23:21, 13 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
==Vandalismo== | |||
Per , I reported them to AIV as you had already warned them several times. Saludos --]<sup>]</sup> 10:00, 24 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
:Thank you so much, he love to attack me, so it's normal to see my page blanked. Happy Thanksgiving ]<sup>]</sup> <sup>]</sup> 18:32, 24 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Za'atar == | |||
Your arguments at Za'atar are disruptive and unhelpful. Your personal attacks and battlefield mentality towards those who support the World View and Misplaced Pages policy will not continue to be tolerated. If you continue to disrupt the discussion with POV and "alternative suggestions" that go against policy, enforcement action may be necessary. ] (]) 04:47, 28 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
: Nsaum, don't waste your time on a likely sock of a banned user--] (]) 05:18, 28 November 2010 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 03:30, 25 February 2023
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Nsaum75. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Syrian town depopulation - allegations of "ethnic cleansing"
You argued against this page once, any chance of budging this stupid see also link? I don't know if I have the right arguments. Cheers —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.181.41.85 (talk) 22:37, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
hello friend!
I have posted new pictures on my blog :D how are you doing? saludos!!!MarioAlvarez05 (talk) 02:24, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
Quick thanks
As a courtesy: thanks for signing my post (d'oh...) VsevolodKrolikov (talk) 01:00, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
Notice
If you continue to disrupt and make broad attacks against editors, as you have done at the PI Arbitration discussion, you may find yourself blocked or reported for disruptive behavior. You are not doing your side any favors. Consider yourself put on notice. Pencilsandcrayons (talk) 18:41, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
- Sockpuppet much? This kind of underhanded behavior is exactly why I stopped editing IP articles or contributing photos to things in the middle east. --nsaum75 18:43, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
Really now? It seems like your comments there are being ignored and an admin even castigated you for your disruptive comments after it was decided Prop 3 was the consensus winner. I think you would be best served if you chose to edit somewhere where you can keep your POV in check. Just friendly advice. Pencilsandcrayons (talk) 01:22, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
complete
Yes, we are done with WP. They are now working on their semester projects which will be presentations. I will get back to tidying some of the articles up later, when the semester is done. Thanks!Thelmadatter (talk) 15:25, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Ahmed Yassin
Hello, You reverted an edit from an IP address to Ahmed Yassin that had added the phrase "and the spiritual leader" to a seemingly hidden part of a reference. You called the edit "vandalism". If you are correct, it is vandalism of an unusually subtle variety. Can you elaborate on this, so that I can understand this sort of thing better? Thank you very much. Cullen328 (talk) 19:15, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
- Reversion was based not on the spirituality addition, but on the blanking of the entire section on alleged terrorist attacks that was sourced. If you scroll down the page, you will see it. --nsaum75
- Thank you. Sorry for being a bit slow. Cullen328 (talk) 23:17, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
- No problem. Happens to the best of us. Have a good weekend!. --nsaum75 23:21, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you. Sorry for being a bit slow. Cullen328 (talk) 23:17, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
Vandalismo
Per this, I reported them to AIV as you had already warned them several times. Saludos --nsaum75 10:00, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you so much, he love to attack me, so it's normal to see my page blanked. Happy Thanksgiving Tbhotch 18:32, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
Za'atar
Your arguments at Za'atar are disruptive and unhelpful. Your personal attacks and battlefield mentality towards those who support the World View and Misplaced Pages policy will not continue to be tolerated. If you continue to disrupt the discussion with POV and "alternative suggestions" that go against policy, enforcement action may be necessary. Pencilsandcrayons (talk) 04:47, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
- Nsaum, don't waste your time on a likely sock of a banned user--Jiujitsuguy (talk) 05:18, 28 November 2010 (UTC)