Misplaced Pages

User talk:Heah: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:52, 10 April 2006 editKickstart70 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,338 edits The Psycho: Yet another← Previous edit Latest revision as of 03:29, 8 March 2023 edit undoYedaman54 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users14,054 editsNo edit summaryTag: 2017 wikitext editor 
(234 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{not around|3=January 2018}}

{| class="messagebox standard-talk" {| class="messagebox standard-talk"
|- |-
|] |]
|''']''' really isn't around much these days for various reasons, so he apologizes if messages are not responded to in a timely fashion.
|''']''' is currently busy in ] and will not be around wikipedia before 12 am ] for the next few weeks, because he has to read ] and write a thesis. If you see him here before then, tell him to get back to work.
|} |}
<!---If anyone can find a better picture, please do so!--->




<div style='text-align: center;'>
The ''']''' is up, check it out if you are interested!
*] ]
</div>
*]


== Proposed move of ] to ] ==
== ] ==
I've just uploaded the book cover about Mr. Mystery. Thus, I can already prove evidence that it does exist. Check out the article for more details. If there's anything wrong, pls. reply on my talk page. --] 05:45, 17 March 2006 (UTC)


As a significant contributor to this article, you may wish to comment
P.S. The previous Mr. Mystery article that got deleted was stubbed.
]. ] (]) 09:42, 1 December 2008 (UTC)


==Redirect of ]==
]Hello, this is a message from ]. A tag has been placed on ], by {{#ifeq:{{{nom}}}|1|]&nbsp;(]&nbsp;'''·''' ]),}} another Misplaced Pages user, requesting that it be ] from Misplaced Pages. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because ] is a redirect to a non-existent page (]). <br><br>To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting ], please affix the template <nowiki>{{hangon}}</nowiki> to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at ]. Feel free to contact the ] if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click ''' ] (]) 19:10, 16 January 2009 (UTC)


== Delete == == Francis Lucille ==


Hi,
I know that you has to delete because it contained text from a pdf. Please could you leave a note on my talk page next time you want to delete something from me? <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]) {{{2|}}}.</small><!-- -->
I have found your username from the spirituality section.
I need your help and suggestion.
I am trying to add an article on one of the Living spiritual teacher.
but,I am facing an problem.


The editors who have visited this page don't understand spirituality and they have tagged it for deletion.
== Aya-*.jpg ==
i need your help urgently.
so they are trying to compare it with other biographies in the field of sports etc.
As you know,the field the spirituality is not very commercial. so I am having a hard time convincing them.
could you please help amd and take a look at article.
http://en.wikipedia.org/Francis_Lucille
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Francis_Lucille.


Appreciate all your help.
Those are wonderful photographs. Thank you for contributing them.


What was the experience like? Do you have a journal or blog entry about it? How did you arrange to be involved with the cooking? Do you have any photos of the finished tea?
&mdash; ] 04:40, 19 March 2006 (UTC)


Thanks
== ] ==
Amarhindustani
] (]) 15:47, 18 March 2009 (UTC)


==Unreferenced BLPs==
Hi there, I am pleased to hear of your new promotion.
] Hello Heah! Thank you for your contributions. I am a ] alerting you that '''1''' of the articles that you created is tagged as an]. The ] policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure ], all biographies should be based on ]. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current '']'' article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{tl|unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:


# ] - <small>{{findsources|J. P. Otto}}</small>
I was having a major argument with myself over how to go about
Thanks!--] (]) 05:21, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
doing something, and so far, You are the person I've gotten to know
and like around, So I thought I would ask your opinion on it.


== A breath... ==


<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">]
The general idea has become (Since I didn't get a Wikicity, which would have made this enormously easier) To write a book whose title
would be "How to generate an Doctorate level Interdisciplinary program on WikiBooks". This is actually something of a digression
from what I really wanted to do do to get a lot of people in the
area. I figured i'd start the WikiCity just post some StarShips, and
I'd have people showing up to oooh and ahhh over the art. I can't go that route on Wikibooks for obvious reasons.


'''Hello Heah''', Sud Ram has smiled at you! Smiles promote ] and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the ] by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing! <br /> <small>''Smile at others by adding {{tls|Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.''</small>
Instead, i'm forced to get things to the point of having sufficient
</div><!-- Template:Smile -->
content to attract more people. This is the main issue.
I just got done counting my Subdepartments. Theres 345 of them. I'm not going to be able to single handedly do more than create them all
as pages with links, references, Socratic Method, and Table of Contents. In other words, I'll end up with 345 pages each of Which is
full of red links to doors for somebody else to open.


== ] nomination of ] ==
My (first) question is, should i just work on only the Main Departments?
Is there a process one would go through to get help with simple
basic but annoyingly boring and time consuming tasks like searching
Misplaced Pages for its relevant articles? I'm sepnding most of my time
nowadays just running the search engine for 5 minutes to find one
link. If I could somehow talk 10 Wikifolks into helping me, it would
really make a difference. There are a variety of related questions.
I have considered folding my subdepartments back into the main departmens- merging. The problem with this is the whole point of the whole thing is to create the meta structure that shows how it would be done, and taking out the sub-departments both removes what would become an important feature, but invites chaos when somebody adds details. (Sort of the worst problem i normally encounter with Misplaced Pages. Navigating between articles and concepts.)


<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>I have nominated ], an article that you created, for ]. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. <!-- Template:AFDWarning --> ] (]) 10:25, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
I'm trying to visualize a realistic growth process considering that
this isn't a Wikicity. The more i look at it, the more depressing it
becomes. Maybe you have some ideas on how to increase the rate of that process. I went and asked for a bot, for instance. Not anything
for a reply. You'd think by now that they would have worked out a way
for a bot to populate a new child network with the links that are relative to say for instance, a set of keywords. I have also been
working a bit on yahoo groups, but honestly, I don't feel comfortable
drawing people in yet from outside the organization, there isn't enough done yet.
Should I just give up alltogether on filling out the references and
leave that to some future wave of Wikipedians? The idea there was to
avoid mirroring or redundancy by linking to whats allready been done.
(as well as build the knowledge base as quickly aspossible to move on into the level of expert.)


==] nomination of ]==
Another part of me is just sort of screaming out; "Just go do the
] A tag has been placed on ], requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages for multiple reasons. '''Please visit the article for details'''.
Psychonautics book!" This makes some sense because it would function
{{Quote box
as a template for what a finished THINKSTARSHIP first edition Departmental Text would look like. It also seems like a bad idea because it might feel like something of a bait and switch to some
| quote = You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the ].
people. (I'm particularly concerned with other WikiBookians. The way
| source = Thank you.
people get welcomed in on these things could use some work. Posting a big fat graphic telling me I'm not up to snuff doesn't seem sensible or fair considering i just started, and the ketch 22 is,
| width = 20%
I tried to keep the book cloaked, but somebody wasn't down with that,
| align = right
and put up a big fat graphic asking me to place the book. I imagine with 101 people that are flybys for every 1 that is on it, they have
}}
their stress 2, and I suppose thus it all comes down to prooving myself.) I'm sure any author feels overwhelmed when they look at a table of contents, but this is another order of magnitude of overwhelmed; I wouldn't be able to finish this alone in my lifetime.
Under the ], articles that do not meet basic Misplaced Pages criteria may be deleted at any time. Please ], and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> on the top of the page and leave a note on ] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.


For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria ], ], ], or ]. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.<!-- Template:Nn-warn-multiple--> ] (]) 07:07, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
Anyways, thanks for your thoughts, time, and energy,
Sincerely
Prometheuspan
] 02:55, 24 March 2006 (UTC)


==] nomination of ]==
Mr Heah does a lot to share knowledge with others who want to learn, through his inumerous contributions
] A tag has been placed on ], requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages for multiple reasons. '''Please visit the article for details'''.
{{Quote box
| quote = You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the ].
| source = Thank you.
| width = 20%
| align = right
}}
Under the ], articles that do not meet basic Misplaced Pages criteria may be deleted at any time. Please ], and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> on the top of the page and leave a note on ] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.


For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria ], ], ], or ]. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.<!-- Template:Nn-warn-multiple--> ] (]) 07:09, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
Knowledge as it should always be- Free!


==] of ]==
Congratulations
]


The article ] has been ]&#32; because of the following concern:
] 19:48, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
:'''Non-Notable student record label. unreferenced.'''


While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ].
== Mr Heah, ==


You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
Mr Heah does a lot to share knowledge with others who want to learn, through his inumerous contributions


Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> will stop the ], but other ]es exist. The ] can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> ] (]) 09:17, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
Knowledge as it should always be- Free!


== ] nomination of ] ==
Congratulations


<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>I have nominated ], an article that you created, for ]. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. <!-- Template:AFDWarning --> &nbsp; — <span style="font-size:large;">] ]</span> 15:07, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
] 19:49, 24 March 2006 (UTC)


==] of ]==
== Your RfA ==
]


The article ] has been ]&#32; because of the following concern:
I have added some questions to your RFA. If you have a minute, I'd appreciate if you took a look at them. Thanks. ] 21:48, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
:'''Fails ].'''


While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ].
Sorry, one last questiony thing, 4a. ] 04:46, 1 April 2006 (UTC)


You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
Btw, I don't know if you've noticed but someone else has added another question. ] 19:49, 1 April 2006 (UTC)


Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> will stop the ], but other ]es exist. The ] can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> ] (]) 14:11, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
== Hello ==


== Happy Adminship Anniversary ==
Hi, thanks for welcoming me and notifying me that I'd spelt my web address wrong (oops).


<div style="align: upperright; padding: 1em; border: solid 3px #2B547E; background-color: #E6E6FA;">] Wishing <b>]</b> a very '''happy adminship anniversary''' on behalf of the ''']'''! ] ]] 23:53, 7 April 2012 (UTC)</div>
==Could you weigh in on the infobox at ]==
I say it is inapropriate and inaccurate, Rory069 insists it should be there, and reverts my attempts to remove it. Discussion is ]. Could you please weigh in. -SM 11:52, 7 April 2006 (UTC)


==Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity==
== RfA ==
] Following a ] in June 2011, consensus was reached to ] (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the ] and the userright will be restored per the ] (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. <!-- Template:Inactive admin --> ] (]) 18:41, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
:''N.B.'': I apologize if you have received any duplicate e-mail messages pursuant to this notification; this may have been due to technical difficulties on the Toolserver. Thanks, &mdash; <strong><span style="font-family:monospace, monospace;">]</span></strong> 18:44, 5 June 2012 (UTC)


==Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity==
Congratulations! Consensus having been reached, it is my pleasure to inform you that you are now an ] on the English Misplaced Pages. Please take a moment to review the ] and the ] before using any of your shiny new buttons. <tt>:-)</tt> If you need assistance or advice, please feel free to request help from other administrators at the ] and ], or to leave a talk page message for me or any other admin. Again, congratulations! <font color=#696969>] <sup>] • ]</sup></font> 21:26, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
] Following a ] in June 2011, consensus was reached to ] (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return&nbsp;if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the ] and the userright will be restored per the ] (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. <!-- Template:Inactive admin --> ] (]) 02:00, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

* Congraulations on your new mop and bucket! :) - ''Cheers'', ] 02:33, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Congrats! You deserved. it. ] ] 07:08, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations! I have no doubt that you will make a very good admin. Cheers ] 12:44, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Congrats! You deserve this and good luck for the future! --<font style="background:gold">]]</font><sup><font style="background:yellow">]</font></sup> 14:50, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

{|cellpadding="10" cellspacing="0" style="border:1px solid black; background-color:#e6e9ff; margin-bottom:.5em" width=100%
|style="text-align:center;"| '''Congratulations'''. Here are what pass for words of wisdom from the puppy:
|-
|style="text-align:left;"|
# Remember you will always protect the ].
# Remember you must always follow the ], except for when you ] them. You will always pick the wrong one to do. (See #5)
# Remember to ] and not ]. Remember that when you are applying these principles most diligently, you are probably dealing with a ].
# Use the ] ability sparingly. Enjoy the insults you receive when you do block.
# Remember when you make these errors, someone will be more than happy to point them out to you in dazzling clarity and ].
# and finally, Remember to contact me if you ever need assistance, and I will do what I am able.
::]<sup>]</sup> 12:45, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
|-
|style="text-align:center;"|<small>DISCLAIMER: This humor does not reflect the official humor of Misplaced Pages, the Wikimedia Foundation, or Jimbo Wales. All rights released under GFDL.
|}


==Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity==
Best wish for your adminship.--] 16:44, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
]
Following a ] in June 2011, consensus was reached to ] (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the ] and the userright will be restored per the ] (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. <!-- Template:Inactive admin --><strong style="font-variant:small-caps">] ]</strong> 23:45, 12 July 2012 (UTC)


==Notice of change==
Congratulations. Remember to affix your anti-troll armor and de-fanaticization helmet. You're gonna need 'em. &mdash;] 21:53, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
Hello. You are receiving this message because of a to the ] that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that if you are inactive for a continuous three year period, you will be unable to request return of the administrative user right. This includes inactive time prior to your desysopping if you were desysopped for inactivity and inactive time prior to the change in policy. Inactivity is defined as the absence of edits or logged actions. Until such time as you have been inactive for three years, you may request return of the tools at the ]. After you have been inactive for three years, you may seek return of the tools only through ]. Thank you. ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)


== ] == == ] ==


{{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 12:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Your use of the rollback against another administrator was grossly inappropriate. I recognize that this is your first day on the job, as it were, but that's little excuse given the very public debates over this matter. TfD is not and has never been the proper location for a speedy candidate any more than AfD (and VfD before it) were the proper locations for article speedy candidates. Please consider your actions more carefully in the future. Best, ] ] 20:52, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=691988767 -->
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].


The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
:''re: at ]'' --]:] 22:16, 8 April 2006 (UTC)


Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] (]) 16:09, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
::That's fair. I've no problem with it being listed at WP:DRV, if someone really wants to. To me, it was an obvious case of T1, especially given the opposite version (which was speedied at the same time). ] ] 22:25, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].


The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
== Dealing with Copyvios ==


Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] (]) 23:07, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
That log is actually automatically generated by a bot. It lists the by day pages so that someone can easily look at the history of any one of them should they need to see what happened to a particular page. The log is there so that we can remove those pages from the main page and keep it from getting cluttered/loading slowly. So yes, you're correct, just remove the entry when you're done :) .:.].:. <sup>]</sup> 16:02, 9 April 2006 (UTC)


== ArbCom 2018 election voter message ==
==Washington hwys cat==
I suppose SPUI's changing the page into a redirect isn't allowed either? --'''] (] - ]) ''' 04:36, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
:It's completely redundant, as I have explained. Everything that had been it is a ] - a highway maintained by the state. --] (] - ] - ]) 04:39, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
::First off, in the absence of any decision on this matter, and in light of the fact that (at least two) people are clearly not agreeing on what should be done, i really don't think that revert warring and nominating things for speedy deletion is the correct way to be dealing with this . . .
::As for my own take on what the category scheme should be, as SPUI seems to want to talk about that rather than how to resolve this dispute . . . while interstates etc may be maintained by the state, if we are going to be consistent in our use of terms on wikipedia-
:::''In the United States, a state highway, state route, or state road (depending on the state) is a highway which is part of a state-wide numbering scheme. In this they are distinct from United States Numbered Highways and Interstate Highways, however these three categories of highways are all owned and constructed by the state in which they are located. State highways which are part of the National Highway System receive substantial federal financing while the remainder are primarily financed by the individual states.'' ]
::So they don't seem simply redundant; as interstates and US highways are ''not'' state highways according to the wikipedia article on state highways, SPUI's argument seems based on a mistaken premise. And i'm not sure why SPUI objects to having an umbrella cat (washington highways) containing state routes, interstates, and US highways. As it stands, ] contains all of the state routes, (which also suggests that ''this'' is what this category is for); why should the umbrella cat also be the place for state routes? That doesn't seem to make sense, as presumably state routes are a distinct thing deserving of their own category.
::With all that said, why is this not being worked out at the talk page of ]? It would seem the proper place to come to such decisions . . .
::so that's my two cents. --]:] 05:09, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
:::Actually that part of the ] article is incorrect - I need to fix it. In Washington, and in many states, a state highway is simply a state-maintained road. --] (] - ] - ]) 06:17, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
::::It basicly ''is'' the article, SPUI . . . Didn't you write a lot of it? It does say that many states use this term differently. But what you've got in Washington is three different sets of highways that all deserve their own category, with an umbrella on top to keep of the rain . . . --]:] 08:59, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
:::::They all have their own category - it's just that the state highway category also applies to the other two, so they go underneath it. --] (] - ] - ]) 09:01, 10 April 2006 (UTC)


{{Ivmbox|Hello, Heah. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
== Eastern Cougar ==


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
I've been trying to contact the people about the Eastern Cougar article, but it's been a real problem, considering that (a) my email address has been really wierd lately and (b) they haven't responded to my messages. I'm doing my best, though.--]] 16:51, 10 April 2006 (UTC)


If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
==Can't sleep, clown will eat me RFA 33⅓==
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
Thank you for your early support during ]. The self-nomination was successful, with an unexpected number of participants from all over. If you ever need anything, are feeling snackish, or would just like to chat, please feel free to visit me on my talk page; I never sleep (much). 8-) ] 19:55, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/05&oldid=866998124 -->
== Nomination for deletion of ] ==
]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ] (]) 07:32, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].


The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
==The Psycho==
Thanks for giving us a day's breathing space on this user...problems with him have lasted weeks now and no one is jumping into to stop him. Discouraging.


Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Just a note on this though, we're pretty sure this is someone who does this as a sockpuppet and if nameblocked will likely return as a different user in short order. I don't know if you have the ability to watch for his IP address, but I thought I'd give you a headsup anyway. --<span style="background: #CCEECC;">]</span>-<span style="background: #CCCCEE;">]</span>-<span style="background: #EECCEE;">]</span> 23:08, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 12:59, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
: *sigh* (by AncorZonr), and now I've got attacks on my own talk page (by Easteregg) --<span style="background: #CCEECC;">]</span>-<span style="background: #CCCCEE;">]</span>-<span style="background: #EECCEE;">]</span> 23:13, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
: And another one here (Boatfarm), who AncrZonr claims is a sockpuppet of me. ] --<span style="background: #CCEECC;">]</span>-<span style="background: #CCCCEE;">]</span>-<span style="background: #EECCEE;">]</span> 23:52, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 03:29, 8 March 2023

This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Heah has not edited Misplaced Pages since January 2018. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.
Heah really isn't around much these days for various reasons, so he apologizes if messages are not responded to in a timely fashion.


archives

Proposed move of Novelty theory to Timewave zero

As a significant contributor to this article, you may wish to comment here. Cardamon (talk) 09:42, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Redirect of Stockyard Stoics

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Stockyard Stoics, by another Misplaced Pages user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Stockyard Stoics is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Stockyard Stoics, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 19:10, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Francis Lucille

Hi, I have found your username from the spirituality section. I need your help and suggestion. I am trying to add an article on one of the Living spiritual teacher. but,I am facing an problem.

The editors who have visited this page don't understand spirituality and they have tagged it for deletion. i need your help urgently. so they are trying to compare it with other biographies in the field of sports etc. As you know,the field the spirituality is not very commercial. so I am having a hard time convincing them. could you please help amd and take a look at article. http://en.wikipedia.org/Francis_Lucille http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Francis_Lucille.

Appreciate all your help.


Thanks Amarhindustani Amarhindustani (talk) 15:47, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Heah! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 13 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. J. P. Otto - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:21, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

A breath...

Hello Heah, Sud Ram has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Articles for deletion nomination of Jump Start Records

I have nominated Jump Start Records, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Jump Start Records. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Codf1977 (talk) 10:25, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Stubborn Records

A tag has been placed on Stubborn Records, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages for multiple reasons. Please visit the article for details.

You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Misplaced Pages criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Codf1977 (talk) 07:07, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Purchase Records

A tag has been placed on Purchase Records, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages for multiple reasons. Please visit the article for details.

You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Misplaced Pages criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Codf1977 (talk) 07:09, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Purchase Records

The article Purchase Records has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-Notable student record label. unreferenced.

While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Codf1977 (talk) 09:17, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Purchase Records

I have nominated Purchase Records, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Purchase Records. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.   — Jeff G. ツ 15:07, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of J. P. Otto

The article J. P. Otto has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:MUSICBIO.

While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Novaseminary (talk) 14:11, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Happy Adminship Anniversary

Wishing Heah a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Misplaced Pages Birthday Committee! Armbrust, B.Ed. about my edits? 23:53, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 18:41, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

N.B.: I apologize if you have received any duplicate e-mail messages pursuant to this notification; this may have been due to technical difficulties on the Toolserver. Thanks, — madman 18:44, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 02:00, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. WJBscribe (talk) 23:45, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Notice of change

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that if you are inactive for a continuous three year period, you will be unable to request return of the administrative user right. This includes inactive time prior to your desysopping if you were desysopped for inactivity and inactive time prior to the change in policy. Inactivity is defined as the absence of edits or logged actions. Until such time as you have been inactive for three years, you may request return of the tools at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. After you have been inactive for three years, you may seek return of the tools only through WP:RFA. Thank you. MBisanz 00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Peter Gorman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peter Gorman is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Peter Gorman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Coretheapple (talk) 16:09, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Trachtenburg Family Slideshow Players for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Trachtenburg Family Slideshow Players is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Trachtenburg Family Slideshow Players until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MSJapan (talk) 23:07, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Heah. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Hallucinogentasks

Template:Hallucinogentasks has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 07:32, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of The Woes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Woes is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/The Woes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 12:59, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Categories: