Revision as of 21:32, 13 August 2003 editMav (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users77,874 editsm Reverted to last edit by Jwrosenzweig← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 05:06, 17 March 2023 edit undoScottywong (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users26,031 editsm remove {{R fully protected}}Tag: Manual revert | ||
(410 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
#REDIRECT ] | |||
The '''9/11 domestic conspiracy theory''' asserts that ] or American intelligence agencies knew, in advance, about the ]. | |||
] often go on to argue that Bush actually supported the attacks as they would provide an excuse to launch the ]. (See also: ]). Immediately after the attacks, ] was seeking evidence to "pin it" on enemies which were already targets of the administration: ] and ]. ] has revealed pressure on himself to participate in this effort. | |||
Some advocates of this theory claim that, on the day of the ] attacks, ]i workers were warned not to go to work at the ] and that key government officials were warned not to fly on aircraft heading through ] and ] airspace. Suspiciously, these theories were "debunked" before even a cursory body count was available, ] from which might credibly have done so. No analysis has been done of the number of Israeli citizens or government officials who died, at least not since the actual death toll (which initially contained over 1000 additional names of persons later discovered to be alive). | |||
Advocates also claim that Bush has not allowed a proper investigation of the attacks. | |||
The theory is also supported by the story of ], a spy for the ]. While in ] custody on ] and ] 2001, Mr. Vreeland wrote a note which listed a number of targets such as the ], ] the ] and ]. The note also said: "Let one happen. Stop the rest!!!" The notes which were in an evidence locker on the morning of September 11, can be seen at: http://www.guerrillanews.com/wildcard/thenotes | |||
Like most conspiracy theories, this one is generally derided by authority as being unsubstantiated, and less credible claims are examined in depth as more credible ones go unexamined. This happens even on ] (''see ]''). | |||
This theory is not unique - such struggles to write ] are common. It parallels the more widespread belief that the ] had advance knowledge of the Japanese ], which propelled the US into ], and the accepted historical facts that ] knew about the attack on ], and that ] approved the ]. | |||
Distrust of authority plays a role in the propagation of any such theory. | |||
See also: | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*'']'' | |||
==External Links== | |||
* http://www.mindprod.com/bush911.htm | |||
* http://www.guerrillanews.com/wildcard/vreeland_one | |||
* http://copvcia.com/ | |||
* http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/062103A.shtml |
Latest revision as of 05:06, 17 March 2023
Redirect to: