Misplaced Pages

9/11 domestic complicity conspiracy theories: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:27, 26 August 2003 edit82.35.90.79 (talk) correction of factual howlers/misinformation.← Previous edit Latest revision as of 05:06, 17 March 2023 edit undoScottywong (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users26,031 editsm remove {{R fully protected}}Tag: Manual revert 
(407 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
#REDIRECT ]
The '''9/11 domestic conspiracy theory''' asserts that ] or American intelligence agencies knew, in advance, about the ].

] often go on to argue that Bush actually supported the attacks as they would provide an excuse to launch the ]. (See also: ]). Immediately after the attacks, ] was seeking evidence to "pin it" on enemies which were already targets of the administration: ] and ]. ] has revealed pressure on himself to participate in this effort.

Some advocates of this theory claim that, on the day of the ] attacks, ]i workers were warned not to go to work at the ] and that key government officials were warned not to fly on aircraft heading through ] and ] airspace. No evidence has ever been offered in support of these theories.

Advocates also claim that Bush has not allowed a proper investigation of the attacks.

The theory is also supported by the story of ], a career criminal on the run from fraud charges in Michigan who claims to have been a spy for the ]. While in ] custody on ] and ] 2001, Mr. Vreeland claims he wrote a note which listed a number of targets such as the ], ] the ] and ]. The note also said: "Let one happen. Stop the rest!!!" The notes which were in an evidence locker on the morning of September 11, can be seen at: http://www.guerrillanews.com/wildcard/thenotes

Like most conspiracy theories, this one is generally derided by authority as being unsubstantiated, and less credible claims are examined in depth as more credible ones go unexamined. This happens even on ] (''see ]'').

This theory is not unique - such struggles to write ] are common. It parallels the more widespread belief that the ] had advance knowledge of the Japanese ], which propelled the US into ], and the more mainstream belief that the ] started the ].

Distrust of authority plays a role in the propagation of any such theory.

See also:

*]
*]
*'']''

==External Links==
* http://www.mindprod.com/bush911.htm
* http://www.guerrillanews.com/wildcard/vreeland_one
* http://copvcia.com/
* http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/062103A.shtml

Latest revision as of 05:06, 17 March 2023

Redirect to: