Misplaced Pages

9/11 domestic complicity conspiracy theories: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:26, 9 December 2003 editDaniel Quinlan (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators17,406 edits this evidence applies to what the article claims it is not about in the introduction← Previous edit Latest revision as of 05:06, 17 March 2023 edit undoScottywong (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users26,031 editsm remove {{R fully protected}}Tag: Manual revert 
(386 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
#REDIRECT ]
''The neutrality of this article is ].''

The '''9/11 domestic conspiracy theory''' is a ] which asserts that ] or American intelligence agencies knew, in advance, about the ], and allowed it to happen or even caused it. It is not to be confused with theories that parts of the US government may have had some warning of the attacks but did not act due to error or incomplete information. Like most conspiracy theories, this one is generally derided by authorities as being unsubstantiated.

Theorists often go on to argue that Bush actually supported the attacks as they would provide an excuse to launch the ]. (See also: ]). Immediately after the attacks, ] was seeking evidence to "pin it" on enemies which were already targets of the administration: ] and ]. ] has alleged pressure on himself to participate in this effort, but has failed to provide evidence which has drawn criticism.

Some advocates of this theory claim that, on the day of the ] attacks, ]i workers were warned not to go to work at the ] and that key government officials were warned not to fly on aircraft heading through ] and ] airspace. No evidence has ever been offered in support of these theories, although ] was earlier in ] warned off commerical flight "for the rest of his term" by the FBI; Willie Brown, mayor of San Francisco, was warned the day before against flying; and several "top Pentagon officials" cancelled 9/11 travel plans the day before.

Advocates also claim that Bush has not allowed a proper investigation of the attacks. (As of October ], the bipartisan commission continues to be barred from certain "key intelligence" documents by Bush, and is considering subpoena power.)

The theory is also supported by the story of ], a career criminal on the run from fraud charges in Michigan who claims to have been a spy for the ]. While in ] custody on ] and ] 2001, Mr. Vreeland claims he wrote a note which listed a number of targets such as the ], ] the ] and ]. The note also said: "Let one happen. Stop the rest!!!" The notes which were in an evidence locker on the morning of September 11, can be seen at: http://www.guerrillanews.com/wildcard/thenotes

Some critics say that the Bush administration did not follow its own protocols for dealing with hijacked planes, updated in June 2001 (see links below).

==See also==

*]
*]
*'']''
*]

==External Links==
* http://www.911review.org/
* http://www.serendipity.li/wtc.html
* http://www.mindprod.com/bush911.htm
* http://www.guerrillanews.com/wildcard/vreeland_one
* http://copvcia.com/
* http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/062103A.shtml
*
* in ]
*, describing in minute detail the protocols and procedures to be undertaken if a plane is hijacked. Not one of these protocols, issued four months and eleven days before the attacks, were followed on September 11th.

Latest revision as of 05:06, 17 March 2023

Redirect to: