| Revision as of 01:58, 21 March 2010 editZenwhat (talk | contribs)Rollbackers4,094 edits →Longchenpa← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 20:11, 21 March 2023 edit undoLegobot (talk | contribs)Bots1,667,255 editsm Bot: Fixing lint errors, replacing obsolete HTML tags: <font> (2x)Tag: Fixed lint errors | ||
| (21 intermediate revisions by 18 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{not around|3=February 2011}} | |||
| I'm here only sporadically, so if you leave a message, don't expect a prompt response. | I'm here only sporadically, so if you leave a message, don't expect a prompt response. | ||
| {{Quotation|Five monks were meditating when suddenly the wind picked up and a flag nearby flapped in the wind.<br><br> The first monk, the youngest of the group, broke his meditation and shouted, "Flag is moving!"<br><br>The second monk shouted, "Wind is moving!"<br><br>The third monk shouted, "Mind is moving!"<br><br>The fourth monk shouted, "Nothing is moving!"<br><br>The fifth monk, the eldest of the group, shouted, "Mouths are moving!"}} | {{Quotation|Five monks were meditating when suddenly the wind picked up and a flag nearby flapped in the wind.<br><br> The first monk, the youngest of the group, broke his meditation and shouted, "Flag is moving!"<br><br>The second monk shouted, "Wind is moving!"<br><br>The third monk shouted, "Mind is moving!"<br><br>The fourth monk shouted, "Nothing is moving!"<br><br>The fifth monk, the eldest of the group, shouted, "Mouths are moving!"}} | ||
| You can type whatever you want below this. ] | |||
| == Faith in the Kalama Sutta == | |||
| The offending section has seemed to have disappeared since you asked my help on this. It seems good as it now stands, but I added my ha'peth worth about faith in the ] article instead ] (]) 16:26, 18 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| You requested this article in the Buddhism Wikiproject. Someone did ''a lot'' of work and made it on their own: ]. Thought you might want to check it out! <font size="4">]</font> <font face="impact"> ]</font> (]) 17:24, 27 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| : Thank you for the heads up. That filled a big gap in the religion section of the ]. ''''']''''' 16:02, 28 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| : P.S.: Does your scope of interest include human knowledge as a whole (the Big Picture, a bird's eye view, EVERYTHING)? If so, please consider joining ]. ''-]'' | |||
| I don't really have any fixed scope of interest on Misplaced Pages. I enjoy contributing but don't seriously expect anything much to come from this site. I will edit pretty much whatever I want, whenever I want, if I can get away with it (]), which tends to be random, small fixes and improvements, and I don't really bother with the hassle of trying to collaborate with anyone. I'm also lazy about searching for good references. And I'm not a consistent editor, like the type of person who will edit Misplaced Pages every day, several hours a day, week after week. The length of time I spend on here now varies greatly. | |||
| So, I might contribute to pretty much any wikiproject, including yours if I happen to feel like it (right now I don't) but I won't make the formal commitment of signing my name to the page or adding some silly category tag, "Support of Wikiproject Whatever," to my userpage. With that said, I think that the lack of good outlines is the least of Misplaced Pages's issues. | |||
| Thanks for the offer, though. <font size="4">]</font> <font face="impact"> ]</font> (]) 16:28, 28 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| : What are the most of Misplaced Pages's issues? ''''']''''' 23:34, 5 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hi, | |||
| You've got SRA on your hall of shame page. Now that ResearchEditor has been blocked, I wonder if you still think it belongs there? Just curiosity... ] <small>] ] Misplaced Pages's rules:</small>]/] 15:00, 31 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :I thought I deleted that page? I remember somebody complaining about it, that it was "uncivil," etc.. I don't update that page anymore. | |||
| :Anyway, it wasn't that specific user or edit which I thought was shameful: It was the existence of the entire page. You had a page devoted to a phenomenon that ''never actually happened''. At the time, the article was regularly filled with allegations and speculations that SRA actually might've gone on and I thought that was a LOL funny. | |||
| :Looking at it now, it seems like the article is much better, no doubt due to the banning of a whole slew of editors and a small group of rational individual editors putting their feet down over such nonsense. | |||
| :Thanks for reminding me, btw, about all of my stupid subpages. I need to delete some of them. <font size="4">]</font> <font face="impact"> ]</font> (]) 15:49, 1 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::You could always slap a {{tl|db-userreq}} on it. Glad you're happy with the current SRA, it was a labour of hate. I really hated the douchebag who thought it was real. ] <small>] ] Misplaced Pages's rules:</small>]/] 16:26, 1 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :::You shouldn't take Misplaced Pages or such crazy people so seriously. I bet he thinks Satan created rock 'n roll and Obama is the anti-Christ. <font size="4">]</font> <font face="impact"> ]</font> (]) 16:27, 1 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Request for assistance == | |||
| I am currently trying to help the editors in the {{la|Falun Gong}} topic area move away from POV pushing and personal commentary. (Please note: ].) You are an editor that I believe can help facilitate this change. I am looking for some uninvolved people with experience and savvy to become involved in the editorial process. A review of the article and associated discussion, in a style similar to a good article review or broad RfC response, would be a good first step and very helpful. However, some leadership in discussion and editing as a whole would be invaluable and sincerely appreciated. This can cover a very broad range including (but not limited to) identifying article flaws, keeping conversation focused on content, reporting disruptive editors, making proposed compromises, boldly correcting errors, and so forth. If you are willing to help out, please look things over and provide your feedback on the Falun Gong talk page. Essentially, we need some experienced editors to put things on track. Any assistance in this regard is gratefully welcomed. Thanks! ] (]) 06:55, 5 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Art requests? == | |||
| Hey, I'm asking you this because you seem like the type of person who'd know... | |||
| Do you know if there's any place on Misplaced Pages where a person can request that a piece of artwork be made for Misplaced Pages (for the Wikimedia Commons)? I know there's a place for people can request scripts or bots, so I thought, why not art? | |||
| Because I had a good idea for something for the ] article, which would also be a fun project: It would be neat to have a single image depicting the various mythological creatures of Buddhist cosmology. ]s, ]s, ]s, ]s, ]s, etc.. There are ''some'' pictures of these things on the Commons already, but they're not very good and couldn't be combined into a single presentation, for instance, for the ] article or the Buddhist Outline. <font size="4">]</font> <font face="impact"> ]</font> (]) 12:38, 4 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| : ] rocks! | |||
| : I highly recommend that you try to do it yourself. Many graphics software programs are free, and are as or nearly as powerful as their non-free counterparts. You'll be surprised how easy graphics programs are to use when you have the proper instructions. For instructions, Misplaced Pages-style, see... | |||
| : ''']''' | |||
| : A program not listed on there is a ] program run online (from its website). Misplaced Pages needs a tutorial on it, so if you get good at using it, please contribute one. | |||
| : Another free program not listed, but of the download type, is ]. | |||
| : See also: ] and ]. | |||
| : Dipping into the effort yourself will help you understand the programs better so that you can better specify what you may want others to do, and so that you can touch up their work (very handy). And you may be surprised at the quality results you can produce yourself. | |||
| : To find others who can help, see: | |||
| :* ] | |||
| :* ] | |||
| :* ] | |||
| :* ] | |||
| : I hope you find my advice helpful. | |||
| ''''']''''' 23:34, 5 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Revert == | |||
| Why did you revert my edit here? ☯ Zenwhat (talk) 02:01, 10 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :To remove this unsourced/uncited controversial statement: | |||
| "When he got there, he found that Buddhism, which had already been established, was perverted by superstitious devotionalism, devoid of true insight. Thus, Bodhidharma focused on direct insight about one's own experience, under the instruction of a Zen teacher, discouraging misguided veneration of Buddhas for the sake of superstition."] (]) 18:08, 12 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::I didn't add that, though. I ''restored'' it after a user removed a fair amount of content from that section without explanation. I agree that anything there which is not sourced ''should'' be sourced, though, so would it be okay if I restored it and added a {{fact}} tag? When you made that revert, you also removed a paragraph that was previously there and was sourced. <font size="4">]</font> <font face="impact"> ]</font> (]) 18:26, 12 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::: Fair enough. Regarding Barry Graham - while wikipedia shouldn't be in the business of determining who is and isn't a "legitimate" representative of any religion - Barry has been the subject of a wide controversy and follow-up investigation by the American Zen Teachers Association, as well as the Soto-shu administration in Japan - the findings were that regardless of his current relationship with any teacher, his "past story" about training in Scotland, and receiving transmission in Japan are completely false. Now, if this were an article about Barry, or even about Western Zen authors - then I could see where it would be appropriate to list him, along with mentioning the "controversy" with citations for "his story" as well as the official findings and statements calling him a fraud. But this isn't that - it's an article about Zen in general, and this seems too thorny an issue to bring up there. Does that make sense? ] (]) 02:02, 13 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Accusations of bad faith == | |||
| are beneath you, when what you say is not supported by the evidence. Please strike or remove. These issues that you claim are small cut right to the heart of the matter, and have been staple of that ]s editing - which has involved meatpuppetry, misuse of ] etc, and other tendentious and disruptive editing tactics. <span style="font-family:Papyrus">] <small>]</small></span> 21:48, 12 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| (Referring to the ] article) | |||
| :I'm not accusing either of you of bad faith. I'm saying you're both good faith editors who are misjudging eachother as bad faith editors. | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| :I agree it's extremely annoying for a single editor to ''dominate'' an article the way that Noirtist does, but from what I've seen of his edits so far, they aren't too contentious. <font size="4">]</font> <font face="impact"> ]</font> (]) 21:53, 12 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ]] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ]. Thank you.<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ] ] 05:22, 9 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
| Bibbity booooooobahbabbity, Zenwhat!!! | |||
| :: I disagree. You say I revert all his edits, that's a bad faith accusation as it is clearly untrue. I do revert or copyedit his bad edits. I'm afraid he has shown his colours and is clearly editing with an agenda on this page and not with the goals of the project in mind. <span style="font-family:Papyrus">] <small>]</small></span> 21:55, 12 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| '''Bibbity booooooobahbabbity!'''''--] (]) 12:27, 14 May 2011 (UTC)Italic text'' | |||
| :::He listed his 13 edits, they seemed fairly reasonable, even if many were arbitrary, and you regarded them all as wrong, and reverted all of it, which seemed unnecessary. A POV-pusher isn't going to bother to take the time to itemize his edits. POV-pushers also tend to be highly concerned with ''removing'' certain content, but from what I've seen thus, he's been reasonable, allowing or even adding content critical of Stevenson. Both of you have been reverting eachother's edits for relatively silly, minor, trivial issues, which both, as I said, lean in the direction of weasel words but never goes so far as to be a serious problem. <font size="4">]</font> <font face="impact"> ]</font> (]) 22:05, 12 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :::: Incorrect again. You don't seem to have dealt with many POV pushers in the pseudoscience area. Take Dana Ullman for example, this is very similar behaviour. As you said his 13 edits were arbitrary, apart from a few that were clearly non neutral and incorrect. Hence I reverted them all. After he "justified" his edits I reverted only those that were still incorrect. You are enabling his bad faith and anti-wikipedia behaviour, and the only reason I take issue with you making incorrect accusations of bad faith rather than other editors there is because you are reasonable. If this is an attempt at being even handed it is coming across rather badly, especially the demonstratively false and bad faith accusation you have made. You are support the weasel worded, anti wikipedia version through you enabling and bad faith comments. I hope you look again and realise this. I do not regard the whitewashing of this material as a minor issue, and he has only kept material he has been forced to. <span style="font-family:Papyrus">] <small>]</small></span> 09:02, 13 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| You have yet to refactor or strike this bad faith accusation, which has been picked up on by another editor. Note the other editor has several times taken me to ANI, where the community has decided I have acted correctly and in defence of NPOV. <span style="font-family:Papyrus">] <small>]</small></span> 10:18, 14 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==File copyright problem with File:Nuvola apps kuickshowblackmod.png== | |||
| == Talkback == | |||
| ] | |||
| Thank you for uploading ]. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Misplaced Pages takes ] very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the '''license''' and the '''source''' of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a ''']''' to the ]. | |||
| If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in . | |||
| {{talkback|Verbal}} | |||
| <span style="font-family:Papyrus">] <small>]</small></span> 21:58, 12 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the ]. Thanks again for your cooperation.<!-- Template:Di-no license-notice --> ] (]) 11:24, 5 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == Longchenpa == | |||
| {{you've got mail}}] (]) 05:39, 20 June 2011 (UTC) | |||
| Hello, Zenwhat, it's been a long time. We worked on the ] article together last year. | |||
| ==MfD nomination of ]== | |||
| A while back you asked me if I was Bill Cassidy in an off-line wiki email. No, I'm not. But I conveniently left off the fact that I am the former Ani Dechen from The Buddha From Brooklyn. The anti-Jetsunma -- and anti-Dharma, really -- slant of that book is largely my responsibility because Martha Sherrill and I became very close in the writing of it. I'm a very good actress, deceptive, with the self-deception coming first. The long and short of it is that I was upset with Jetsunma for taking my robes away even though I wasn't keeping the vows. I was never troubled by the "beating" as I called it. I exaggerated quite a bit and used it later because I knew other people would find it shocking. Actually, she never hurt me, swatted me lightly once, missed another time, and yelled at me quite a lot after I broke my monastic vows and hid it. | |||
| ], a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ] and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of ] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> — <span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS;">''']''' <span style="white-space:nowrap;">] ʕ(<sup>Õ</sup>ل<sup>ō</sup>)ˀ</span> <small>].</small></span> 19:33, 21 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == File:Misplaced Pages feedback loop.jpg listed for deletion == | |||
| At first I tried purifying my mistakes, but then started looking for people (ex-members of Jetsunma's temple) who would tell me what I wanted to hear. I convinced myself that if Jetsunma wouldn't let me wear the robes of a nun when I still had some of my vows unbroken, then she was putting me in danger of breaking the remaining vows and had no compassion for me whatsoever. I didn't see that she had confidence in me that I'd stick with it. | |||
| A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw --> ] (]) 02:21, 8 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| ] | |||
| Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Misplaced Pages, introducing inappropriate pages, such as ], is not in accordance with our ]. If you would like to experiment, please use the ]. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Misplaced Pages's ]. | |||
| Once I'd convinced myself she had no compassion (for not giving me what I wanted) I decided I needed to "save" people from Jetsunma and began this crusade against her. I filtered everything through this new lens of "she has no compassion" without considering that I was the one who wasn't considering the effect of my actions on others. The aggressive slant of the Misplaced Pages article was part of that crusade. | |||
| If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. <!-- Template:Db-vandalism-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ] (]) 20:31, 12 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
| I spent 13 years trying to connect to other Dharma centers and teachers and kept running into my own mind and all the anger I'd created. Finally, one Lama told me to thank my teachers, that that's why I couldn't move on. | |||
| == Just to let you know -- Missing Wikipedians == | |||
| I wrote to Jetsunma with two lines of apology and then asked her help with a personal matter -- and even with a 13-year crusade, the book, my manipulating the Misplaced Pages page, she was effortlessly kind. And I was her student so long -- 12 years -- that this wasn't even a surprise to me. | |||
| You have been mentioned at ]. X] (]) 16:08, 3 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| She's shown her qualities, and I've shown mine. | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Don't buy into The Buddha From Brooklyn. You've met one of the main people responsible for the attitudes in that book. Martha Sherrill could only write from the sources she had. ] (]) 13:58, 21 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| Hi,<br> | |||
| ::Hmm. My intuition tells me you're lying and I have a pretty good intuition. But it's not my problem. Jetsunma's karma will fall upon her alone, whether the Misplaced Pages page or books about her are accurate or not. <font size="4">]</font> <font face="impact"> ]</font> (]) 01:58, 21 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
| You appear to be eligible to vote in the current ]. The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages ]. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to ] and submit your choices on ]. For the Election committee, ] (]) 13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692071653 --> | |||
| == A bowl of strawberries for you! == | |||
| == Wikiproject Essay == | |||
| {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
| {{talkback|Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Essay_Categorization_and/or_Classification#Getting_this_project_going}} <big>]</big><small><sup>]</sup></small> 04:36, 23 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | hey, | |||
| I found your graphic on the Misplaced Pages Feedback Loop very informative and I might use it in a talk at Wikimania 2016 in Italy. I want to talk about imbalance on Misplaced Pages and that includes the Content bias, too. | |||
| So I hope that you are OK with that. Your thoughts on the community and rules of conduct and editing are really inspiring for me. <span style="color:#8b00ff;">Earl</span><span style="color:#6528c2;">ysp</span><span style="color:#3f5184;">atz</span>'''<sup><span style="background:#F9FD00">]</span></sup> 15:31, 5 June 2016 (UTC)''' | |||
| |} | |||
| == File:Trifectaparody.png listed for discussion == | |||
| ] A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw --> ] (]) 18:33, 23 March 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination for deletion of Template:Botstatusheader == | |||
| ]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ''' —''' ] (]) (])  01:51, 1 July 2018 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 20:11, 21 March 2023
 | This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Zenwhat has not edited Misplaced Pages since February 2011. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
I'm here only sporadically, so if you leave a message, don't expect a prompt response.
Five monks were meditating when suddenly the wind picked up and a flag nearby flapped in the wind.
The first monk, the youngest of the group, broke his meditation and shouted, "Flag is moving!"
The second monk shouted, "Wind is moving!"
The third monk shouted, "Mind is moving!"
The fourth monk shouted, "Nothing is moving!"
The fifth monk, the eldest of the group, shouted, "Mouths are moving!"
You can type whatever you want below this. Ignore all rules!
Nomination for deletion of Template:Botstatus
Template:Botstatus has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork ―Œ 05:22, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
Bibbity booooooobahbabbity, Zenwhat!!! Bibbity booooooobahbabbity!--96.243.57.10 (talk) 12:27, 14 May 2011 (UTC)Italic text
File copyright problem with File:Nuvola apps kuickshowblackmod.png
Thank you for uploading File:Nuvola apps kuickshowblackmod.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Misplaced Pages takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:24, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
UOJComm (talk) 05:39, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
MfD nomination of Misplaced Pages:BRD misuse
Misplaced Pages:BRD misuse, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:BRD misuse and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Misplaced Pages:BRD misuse during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ʕ(ل)ˀ Contribs. 19:33, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
File:Misplaced Pages feedback loop.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Misplaced Pages feedback loop.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 02:21, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Misplaced Pages:Special log
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Misplaced Pages, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Misplaced Pages:Special log, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Misplaced Pages's criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Liberalufp (talk) 20:31, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
Just to let you know -- Missing Wikipedians
You have been mentioned at Misplaced Pages:Missing Wikipedians. XOttawahitech (talk) 16:08, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
A bowl of strawberries for you!
|
hey,
I found your graphic on the Misplaced Pages Feedback Loop very informative and I might use it in a talk at Wikimania 2016 in Italy. I want to talk about imbalance on Misplaced Pages and that includes the Content bias, too. So I hope that you are OK with that. Your thoughts on the community and rules of conduct and editing are really inspiring for me. Earlyspatz 15:31, 5 June 2016 (UTC) |
File:Trifectaparody.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Trifectaparody.png, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:33, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Botstatusheader
Template:Botstatusheader has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 01:51, 1 July 2018 (UTC)