| Revision as of 16:01, 12 March 2007 editMhltv (talk | contribs)30 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:59, 12 March 2007 edit undoR613vlu (talk | contribs)633 edits →[]: KeepNext edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| ** See above - apparently the user is banned so cannot participate. Would some kind admin please unblock him so that he can comment here - seems only fair.--] 20:44, 11 March 2007 (UTC) | ** See above - apparently the user is banned so cannot participate. Would some kind admin please unblock him so that he can comment here - seems only fair.--] 20:44, 11 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ***Comment: There is no block on Kinnernetgal, nor was there ever. Check the block log. --] 21:26, 11 March 2007 (UTC) | ***Comment: There is no block on Kinnernetgal, nor was there ever. Check the block log. --] 21:26, 11 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ****I assume that Osidge means Joel Leyden, as he is the person being accused of posting elsewhere rather than here, not Kinnernetgal!--] 22:59, 12 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| * '''Keep''' Fine for a stub, if the event continues it can only grow in time - ] 03:14, 10 March 2007 (UTC) | * '''Keep''' Fine for a stub, if the event continues it can only grow in time - ] 03:14, 10 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' I don't see how this is a notable event. ] 02:52, 11 March 2007 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' I don't see how this is a notable event. ] 02:52, 11 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
| Line 19: | Line 20: | ||
| * '''Keep''' At the risk of being accused of original research, I know that this is an important event. Deleting the article would make Misplaced Pages ridiculous.--] 20:44, 11 March 2007 (UTC) | * '''Keep''' At the risk of being accused of original research, I know that this is an important event. Deleting the article would make Misplaced Pages ridiculous.--] 20:44, 11 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
| * '''Keep''' As per comments above ] 16:01, 12 March 2007 (UTC) | * '''Keep''' As per comments above ] 16:01, 12 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
| * '''Keep''' On the evidence, it's clearly notable. What if the authors are relatively new? ].--] 22:59, 12 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:59, 12 March 2007
Kinnernet
Non-notable event. All contributors are brand new users. woggly 17:34, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- This AfD page is now the subject of headline screed at Freerepublic: Ethan Mitchell 20:59, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: That Freerepublic article by Joel Leyden seems to be a little harsh on the nominator for nominating a page that looks like a spammy advertisement. --Strangerer (Talk | Contribs) 21:39, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, I figured something like that would happen. Joel Leyden is banned user:Israelbeach and I "strongly suspected" all the contributors to the Kinnernet article were his sockpuppets, as well he knows. He likes spreading nasty comments about me and Misplaced Pages for the Google search engines to find, heaven knows he's done it before. But if the Misplaced Pages community deems the article notable, that's good enough for me. --woggly 05:18, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: That Freerepublic article by Joel Leyden seems to be a little harsh on the nominator for nominating a page that looks like a spammy advertisement. --Strangerer (Talk | Contribs) 21:39, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Seems real enough and of some notability, but the article as it stands at the moment is decidedly spammy, and as such it's no surprise that anyone should think it was a puff-piece for a non-notable event. This needs a massive cleanup to reach the style which Misplaced Pages articles are meant to aspire to - we are not an "infotainment" site or bulletin board, we are an encyclopedia. I'll attempt a start to the cleanup, but more work is welcome. Grutness...wha? 00:40, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- Looks much better now, Grutness. --Strangerer (Talk | Contribs) 05:03, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep They may not often be right, but they are about this one: notice in that same posting the quote from The Times (London). DGG 02:04, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep As per above comments Kinnernetgal 12:31, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep It's an event. But the tactics here are worrisome. In particular, posting a vanity article at FR rather than engaging with the Misplaced Pages AfD process seems like bad faith. Especially given that the article is phrased in terms of attacking wikipedia, not defending the article. And...Kinnernetgal, is this your very first post? Ethan Mitchell 13:48, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- See above - apparently the user is banned so cannot participate. Would some kind admin please unblock him so that he can comment here - seems only fair.--Osidge 20:44, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: There is no block on Kinnernetgal, nor was there ever. Check the block log. --woggly 21:26, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
- I assume that Osidge means Joel Leyden, as he is the person being accused of posting elsewhere rather than here, not Kinnernetgal!--R613vlu 22:59, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: There is no block on Kinnernetgal, nor was there ever. Check the block log. --woggly 21:26, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
- See above - apparently the user is banned so cannot participate. Would some kind admin please unblock him so that he can comment here - seems only fair.--Osidge 20:44, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Fine for a stub, if the event continues it can only grow in time - Denny 03:14, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I don't see how this is a notable event. Kolindigo 02:52, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep This is a notable conference and deserves an article.--Newport 12:06, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep At the risk of being accused of original research, I know that this is an important event. Deleting the article would make Misplaced Pages ridiculous.--Osidge 20:44, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep As per comments above Mhltv 16:01, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep On the evidence, it's clearly notable. What if the authors are relatively new? WP:BITE.--R613vlu 22:59, 12 March 2007 (UTC)