Revision as of 16:59, 24 March 2005 editNumerousfalx (talk | contribs)994 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:19, 24 March 2005 edit undoAeropus II of Macedon (talk | contribs)19 edits →[]Next edit → | ||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
*'''Keep''' - --] 16:57, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' - --] 16:57, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC) | ||
*'''Keep'''-needs cleaning up , but an interesting and informative article.--] 16:59, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC) | *'''Keep'''-needs cleaning up , but an interesting and informative article.--] 16:59, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC) | ||
*'''keep''' |
Revision as of 17:19, 24 March 2005
The Tetragrammaton in the Bible
This article presents original research attempting to rebut a claim made by the Jewish encyclopedia. Although interesting, it is not appropriate for wikipedia. --Kzollman 04:30, Mar 24, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Pure original research, unclear how it could not be. Please note that Iaoue is by the same author, and suffers the same issues. Jayjg 04:52, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, un-encyclopaedic, POV original essay. Megan1967 07:16, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Keep --Irishpunktom\ 11:48, Mar 24, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. As it stands, original research. The author should consider submitting the piece to a Peer Review publication. El_C 12:23, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Keep - --Tomtom 16:57, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Keep-needs cleaning up , but an interesting and informative article.--Numerousfalx 16:59, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- keep