Misplaced Pages

User talk:Wiki Raja: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:56, 13 March 2007 editNichalp (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers28,407 edits Sockpuppet Dispute: reply← Previous edit Revision as of 16:50, 13 March 2007 edit undoVivin (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers3,403 edits HelloNext edit →
Line 44: Line 44:
Please try to address the issue rather than blindly reverting it..I am not disputing the event it self..But what's written in the article is kinda deceiving.Hope you understand this.]<sup>]</sup> 09:55, 13 March 2007 (UTC) Please try to address the issue rather than blindly reverting it..I am not disputing the event it self..But what's written in the article is kinda deceiving.Hope you understand this.]<sup>]</sup> 09:55, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
:If that is the case, then the article needs to be as NPOV as possible then. You can go ahead and revert it back now. Sorry for the confusion. ] 10:03, 13 March 2007 (UTC) :If that is the case, then the article needs to be as NPOV as possible then. You can go ahead and revert it back now. Sorry for the confusion. ] 10:03, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

== Hello ==

Hello Wiki Raja, I received your email and I've added my comments to both category discussions. --]<sup><font color="green">]]</font></sup> 16:50, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:50, 13 March 2007

Please click here to leave me a new message. Archives  

Essjay controversy

Thank you for editing this article. Please note that the "typo" you have been correcting is actually a direct quote in which the original author made a misspelling. So that we do not change the quote, the expression has been inserted to confirm that the "error" is intentional. Pardon the note, if you are already aware of this; nobody wants a revert war on such a fine point. Risker 08:30, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

No problem. Regards. Wiki Raja 11:36, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Sockpuppet Dispute

Wiki Raja, if you disagree with the blocks of those sockpuppets, you need to contact the blocking admin (User:Nichalp), or ask for a review on WP:ANI. WP:SSP isn't a place to prove your innocence. Please note that I have no opinion whatsoever about the merits of these blocks, or whether you're a sockpuppeteer; I closed the case because I noticed someone else had blocked those accounts. I don't have the ability to block (or unblock) anyway, I'm not an admin. --Akhilleus (talk) 01:54, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the advice. As for the other three that were blocked, there is no connection between and those users. Once again, this is just another tactic by this particular interest group to be used against me. They saw that they were losing in this vote to keep a particular Category, so they went on a witch hunt to try to disqualify people. Thanks anyways for your help. Wiki Raja 01:58, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
You can request a wikipedia:checkuser to be done to clear your name. I've gone ahead and blocked those accounts permanently as they were created for the sole purpose of influencing the outcome of the deletion. Regards, =Nichalp «Talk»= 18:38, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
I would have done a checkusera long time ago. However, on the requirement box it stated, "Checkuser on yourself to "prove your innocence" These requests are not performed. Please do not ask." So, what does that mean? Wiki Raja 19:11, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Sock puppet issues take a long time to resolve, any one can mark any editor as a suspected sock puppet. It will stay on for 10 days then it comes out. Once it comes out you have wait the 2 months (that's the backlog) to resolve the case. Unless the disruptive behavior is so bad that some admin will do a RFU on those accounts. Usually it is the last resort. If a Suspected sock puppet case is opened against you (it can only be after be XFD closes) then you please your innocence there, no where else. Don’t open up ANI on issues that are not issues. If you suspect Ganapati is sock of somebody else, then under that editors sign you write that the above user is suspected sock puppet of so and so and link the reference case to it so the clsing admin will take that into account. If I were you, then I will stay calm under alleged provocation, always follow the rules. XFD brings the worst out of people, those who are for it and against it. This is when people trip up and get themselves banned. I’ve seen it number of times, no article or category is worth it. If you feel so strong about Tamil Americans then what is needed is an article on Tamil Americans first. That article can later become the base for a category. I find that route much easier than the other. There a 1000s of years left on this Misplaced Pages, we will all be dead and gone by the time Misplaced Pages is no longer a valid tool. Think of that and your perspective about articles and timing about them will change completely. RaveenS 20:21, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the info. I will keep that in mind. Wiki Raja 21:40, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi WikiRaja,
I see above that user RaveenS has given you some smart and sound advice. He advices you to plaster a note next to this 'Ganapati's' signature to warn people that he may be a sock of another user. My only advice to you as a fellow.. er.. 'Dravidian' is that before you stamp such a notice, make sure that the user(Ganapati or Raveena or whoever) is indeed a confirmed sockpuppet or at the very least that there indeed is valid reason for you to believe so. Otherwise, I am afraid that the user may haul you up for a violation of WP:NPA and you may getpacked off to the Himalayas by some admin, with nothing but user RaveenS' sublime philosophy to reflect and meditate upon. Cheers. Did you say What?. Sarvagnya 22:41, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Please don't send me threats on my talk page. It seems that everytime I turn my head, you and Bakasuprman tend to report me for single thing. However, when I legitimately do the same by reporting your incivil behavior, you send me threatening messages. This is not the first time you have done this. Wiki Raja 05:18, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Information icon Hello, I'm ]. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Misplaced Pages is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on ]. Thank you. As a warning to you. Further attacks like the one below will be reported. Wiki Raja 05:28, 13 March 2007 (UTC)


I see above that user RaveenS has given you some smart and sound advice. He advices you to plaster a note next to this 'Ganapati's' signature to warn people that he may be a sock of another user. My only advice to you as a fellow.. er.. 'Dravidian' is that before you stamp such a notice, make sure that the user(Ganapati or Raveena or whoever) is indeed a confirmed sockpuppet or at the very least that there indeed is valid reason for you to believe so. Otherwise, I am afraid that the user may haul you up for a violation of WP:NPA and you may getpacked off to the Himalayas by some admin, with nothing but user RaveenS' sublime philosophy to reflect and meditate upon. Cheers. Did you say What?. Sarvagnya 22:41, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

What?! Sarvagnya 05:36, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Did you say what? Wiki Raja 05:40, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

I'm a little unsure about those users, but let the issue cool down, and I'll remove those templates pointing to your name over the weekend. Please do remind me. Regards, =Nichalp «Talk»= 13:56, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Testing

testing 1.. 2.. 3.. Wiki Raja 05:04, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

NOTE!

Please try to address the issue rather than blindly reverting it..I am not disputing the event it self..But what's written in the article is kinda deceiving.Hope you understand this.Iwazaki 09:55, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

If that is the case, then the article needs to be as NPOV as possible then. You can go ahead and revert it back now. Sorry for the confusion. Wiki Raja 10:03, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Hello

Hello Wiki Raja, I received your email and I've added my comments to both category discussions. --vi5in 16:50, 13 March 2007 (UTC)