| Revision as of 05:10, 29 December 2005 view sourceRJII (talk | contribs)25,810 edits revert redirect vandalism by TomtheHand← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 17:45, 8 May 2023 view source JJMC89 bot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Administrators3,665,934 editsm Moving Category:Fully protected redirects to Category:Misplaced Pages fully protected redirects per Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion/Speedy | ||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #REDIRECT ] | |||
| {{TotallyDisputed}} | |||
| ] | |||
| {{fascism}} | |||
| '''Economic fascism''', (aka '''fascist economy'''), is the set of economic practices and characteristics common to ] regimes in the 1920s and 1930s, with the most often cited characteristic being the presence of private or quasi-private ownership of the means of production that was ''heavily'' coordinated by government. In Italy and Germany, the State instituted a ] that was held to be in the best interest of the nation rather than allowing an economy to ] without centralized coordination. The system included government-mandated business and government partnerships (see '']'') and ] practices. Economic fascism has also been called ''fascist political economy'', ''fascist economy'', ''political economy of fascism'', ''planned capitalism'', and ''autarchic capitalism''. | |||
| ==Economic fascism as a "third way"== | |||
| Economic fascism contrasts with ] where the means of production are privately owned ''and'' privately controlled.<sup>]</sup> It also contrasts with socialism where the means of production are owned collectively by communities or, in some definitions, the state.<sup>]</sup> The common view on private property in economic fascism is, as Thomas R. Eddlem puts it, " simply heavy government regulation and control of what is only nominally private property." {{ref|Eddlem}} Some scholars, however, some dispute the extent of this regulation. ] and ] argue that the common view that private property in the Nazi economy existed in name only is incorrect. They say that while there was substantial central planning of private industry, the severity of the restrictions did not arise to the level of rendering private property a mere formality. Buchheim and Scherner describe the system as a "state-directed private ownership economy." {{ref|B&S}} Michael Coren, in writing of ], an economic theory which underlay the support by some for fascist political economy in the 1930s, said that "economic fascism both capitalism and socialism." {{ref|Coren}} Thus, economic fascism is often referred to as a ']' whose proponents advocated it as a solution to avoid the perceived inegalitarian dangers of too strong of an enforcement of private property rights while at the same time avoiding the total abolition of private ownership of the means of production or outright communism. {{ref|Richman}} In fact, Mussolini referred to his economic system as a "third way," noting it to be distinct from both socialism and capitalism. | |||
| However, while a significant amount of control over private property is a characteristic is essential to economic fascism, some others note additional aspects they believe to be essential to fascist economies. For example, author and journalist ], notes 3 elements: "1) The institution of planned consumption of the spending-borrowing government. 2) The planned economy 3) Militarism as an economic institution" {{ref|Flynn}}. However, some believe militarism is not necessary for a fascist economy. ], in his 1936 book ''The Coming American Fascism'' promotes what he called a non-militaristic "fascist" economic system for the U.S.; he argues that in the absence of war that laissez-faire cannot satisfy the needs of the masses. {{ref|Dennis}} | |||
| ==Government and business collusion== | |||
| While some see the populace as the beneficiaries of a fascist political economy, others see the corporatist aspect of economic fascism as being a source of exploitation of the citizenry, where policies are not made in the best interest in the nation as a whole but in the profit interests of privileged elites in the business-government complex. Geatano Salvemini said in 1936: "In actual fact, it is the State, i.e., the taxpayer who has become responsible to private enterprise. In Fascist Italy the State pays for the blunders of private enterprise... Profit is private and individual. Loss is public and social." {{ref|Salvemini}} Likewise, Jutta Schmitt, a lecturer in Political Science at the University de Los Andes in Venezuela says that "profit production depends on a considerable degree on State-guaranteed profit and the growing interaction and 'melting' of economic monopolies with their political representation in the State apparatus" and that "the main objective of economic fascism is the elevation of the profit rate in times of economic recession to the detriment of the working class." Schmitt, a socialist, notes that economic fascism has been referred to as "planned capitalism." Anthony Gregory, says that economic fascism is designed for government and business's "mutual benefit: profits for the corporate interests, expanded tax revenue, and augmented central planning powers for the state." {{ref|Anthony}} | |||
| ==Economic fascism outside of fascist Italy and Germany== | |||
| Economic fascism was practiced in ] under ] and ] under ]. Some argue that economic fascism was attempted in the U.S. under Franklin Roosevelt with the implementation of the ]. ] said, in 1976, "Fascism was really the basis for the New Deal. It was Mussolini's success in Italy, with his government-directed economy, that led the early New Dealers to say 'But Mussolini keeps the trains running on time." Richard Ebeling argues that the U.S. Supreme Court stopped economic fascism from being implemented in the U.S. when it struck down significant parts of the New Deal, such as the NRA and AAA, as being ]. {{ref|Ebeling||}} | |||
| ==References== | |||
| #{{note|Eddlem}} Eddlem, Thomas R. Introduction. ''And Not a Shot is Fired'' by Jan Kozak, Appleton, WI: Robert Welch University Press, 1999. | |||
| #{{note|B&S}} Buchheim, Christoph and Scherner, Jonas. University of Mannheim, Germany | |||
| #{{note|Coren}} Coren, Michael ''Gilbert: The Man Who Was G.K. Chesterton'' Reed Business Information, Inc, 1990. | |||
| #{{note|Richman}} Richman, Sheldon Concise Encyclopedia of Economics 1993, 2002. | |||
| #{{note|Flynn}} Flynn, John T. ''As We Go Marching'' 1944. | |||
| #{{note|Dennis}} Dennis, Larence. 1936. | |||
| #{{note|Salvemini}} Slavemini, Geatano. ''Under the Axe of Fascism'' 1936. | |||
| #{{note|Anthony}} Anthony, Gregory ''Why the Supreme Court Should Have Just Shut Up'' 2005. | |||
| #{{note|Ebeling}} Ebeling, Richard M. | |||
| ==Footnotes== | |||
| 1. ''Capitalism'' is defined by the Merriam-Webster Dictionary (unabridged) as "an economic system characterized by private or corporation ownership of capital goods, by investments that are determined by private decision rather than by state control, and by prices, production, and the distribution of goods that are determined mainly in a free market." | |||
| 2. ''Socialism'' is defined by the Merriam-Webster Dictionary (unabridged) as "any of various theories or social and political movements advocating or aiming at collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and control of the distribution of goods." | |||
| ==External links== | |||
| * by Christoph Buchheim and Jonas Scherner | |||
| * by Thomas DiLorenzo | |||
| * by Richard M. Ebeling | |||
| * by Sheldon Richman - discusses economic fascism | |||
| * by ] - advocates a non-militaristic economic fascism for the U.S. for the benefit of the working class | |||
| * by David Baker | |||
Latest revision as of 17:45, 8 May 2023
Redirect to: