Misplaced Pages

:Requests for comment/Certified.Gangsta: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:29, 17 March 2007 editSumple (talk | contribs)5,530 edits Other users who endorse this summary← Previous edit Revision as of 05:34, 17 March 2007 edit undoSumple (talk | contribs)5,530 editsm Other users who endorse this summaryNext edit →
Line 93: Line 93:
<!-- If you agree with the summary's presentation of events but did not try and fail to resolve the dispute, please sign in this section. --> <!-- If you agree with the summary's presentation of events but did not try and fail to resolve the dispute, please sign in this section. -->
:# Similar experiences at ]. ] 12:07, 19 February 2007 (UTC) :# Similar experiences at ]. ] 12:07, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
:# Similar experiences at ]. ] (]) 05:29, 17 March 2007 (UTC) :# Similar experiences at ], ], ]. ] (]) 05:29, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
:# :#



Revision as of 05:34, 17 March 2007

In order to remain listed at Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed. This must involve the same dispute with a single user, not different disputes or multiple users. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with ~~~~. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: 04:26, 19 February 2007 (UTC)), the page will be deleted. The current date and time is: 07:26, 12 January 2025 (UTC).

RfC (deleted Feb 19) restored to ease up ani thread. It will be, however, redeleted in 48 hour unless pertinent conditions are met. El_C 00:53, 16 March 2007 (UTC)



Users should only edit one summary or view, other than to endorse.

Statement of the dispute

Certified.Gangsta consistently chooses to revert war rather than participating in discussion. He also loves to label reverts as "minor". When discussing he fails to understand points presented to him and does not yield to consensus. Please note that he has previously edited under the name Bonafide.hustla (talk · contribs). --Ideogram 05:05, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Desired outcome

Certified.Gangsta to cease revert-warring. Participate in discussion of all controversial changes in good faith. Yield to consensus when it is against him.

Evidence of disputed behavior

  1. Revert warring on Culture of Taiwan one
  2. Revert warring on Culture of Taiwan two
  3. Revert warring on Talk:Culture of Taiwan one
  4. Revert warring on Talk:Culture of Taiwan two
  5. Revert warring on Talk:Culture of Taiwan three
  6. Revert warring on Talk:Culture of Taiwan four
  7. Revert warring on Talk:Culture of Taiwan five
  8. Revert warring on Talk:Culture of Taiwan six
  9. Revert warring on Talk:Culture of Taiwan seven
  10. Revert warring on Talk:Culture of Taiwan eight You get the idea, the whole history is filled with it.
  11. Revert warring on Chinese reunification one
  12. Revert warring on Chinese reunification two

A quick scan through his contributions will reveal many other examples. --Ideogram 05:05, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Applicable policies and guidelines

  1. Misplaced Pages:Consensus
  2. Misplaced Pages:Edit war

Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute

  1. Gangsta's initial attempt to remove Culture of Taiwan from WikiProject:China.
  2. Reverted.
  3. Gangsta's revert.
  4. Reverted by a different editor.
  5. Gangsta's second revert.
  6. Reverted.
  7. Gangsta's third revert.
  8. Reverted.
  9. Gangsta's fourth revert.
  10. Reverted, with attempt at discussion.
  11. Gangsta's fifth revert, also reverting the attempt at discussion off the page.
  12. Reverted.
  13. Gangsta's sixth revert, again reverting everything posted since his initial edit.
  14. Reverted by a third user.
  15. Gangsta's seventh revert, again reverting everything posted since his initial edit.
  16. Reverted.
  17. Gangsta's eighth revert, same thing.
  18. Reverted
  19. More attempted discussion.
  20. Gangsta answers, but removes the contested tag at the same time.
  21. Reverted by a fourth user.
  22. Discussion by fourth user and replacement of accidentally deleted answer from Gangsta.
  23. Gangsta answers but still removes the disputed tag.
  24. Reverted.
  25. Deleted answer replaced, and replied to.
  26. Gangsta removes the tag again while asserting he will continue to edit war.
  27. Tag removed, and reply.
  28. Gangsta again removes the tag while replying.
  29. Tag replaced, and reply.
  30. Gangsta removes tag while replying.
  31. Tag replaced, and call for anyone who agrees with Gangsta to speak up.
  32. Fifth user disagrees with Gangsta.
  33. Gangsta removes tag while replying.
  34. Tag replaced, and reply.
  35. Gangsta removes tag while replying.
  36. Tag replaced by sixth user.
  37. Gangsta's umpteenth revert.
  38. Reverted.
  39. Gangsta reverts.
  40. Seventh user reverts.
  41. Gangsta reverts.
  42. Reverted.
  43. Gangsta reverts.
  44. Eighth user reverts.
  45. Gangsta reverts
  46. Reverted.
  47. Gangsta reverts.
  48. Ninth user reverts.
Finally Gangsta gives up. Note that at no time did anyone else agree with Gangsta.

Users certifying the basis for this dispute

{Users who tried and failed to resolve the dispute}

  1. --Ideogram 05:05, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  2. Blueshirts 02:21, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Other users who endorse this summary

  1. Similar experiences at Talk:List_of_Chinese_Americans. Ben Aveling 12:07, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  2. Similar experiences at Talk:Taiwanese_American, Senkaku Islands, Wang Wei (pilot). Sumple (Talk) 05:29, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Response

This is a summary written by the user whose conduct is disputed, or by other users who think that the dispute is unjustified and that the above summary is biased or incomplete. Users signing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Outside Views") should not edit the "Response" section.

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary:

Outside view

This is a summary written by users not directly involved with the dispute but who would like to add an outside view of the dispute. Users editing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Response") should not edit the "Outside Views" section, except to endorse an outside view.

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}


Users who endorse this summary:

Discussion

All signed comments and talk not related to an endorsement should be directed to this page's discussion page. Discussion should not be added below. Discussion should be posted on the talk page. Threaded replies to another user's vote, endorsement, evidence, response, or comment should be posted to the talk page.