Misplaced Pages

Talk:Alytus: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:20, 21 March 2007 editHalibutt (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers34,067 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 03:53, 21 March 2007 edit undoDr. Dan (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers8,342 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 18: Line 18:


::It would be better if Halibutt spoke for himself in this matter, since he made the reverts. Novickas 00:54, 21 March 2007 (UTC) ::It would be better if Halibutt spoke for himself in this matter, since he made the reverts. Novickas 00:54, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
:::You're almost asking for the impossible. ] 03:53, 21 March 2007 (UTC)


:::As long as the historic name of that town is mentioned somewhere in the lead I'm satisfied. Bolding and putting it next to the modern name was a nicer option, but since it raises so much bad blood I could agree to a separate part of the lead. That seems like a nice solution. ''<font color="#901">//</font>'']] 01:20, 21 March 2007 (UTC) ::::As long as the historic name of that town is mentioned somewhere in the lead I'm satisfied. Bolding and putting it next to the modern name was a nicer option, but since it raises so much bad blood I could agree to a separate part of the lead. That seems like a nice solution. ''<font color="#901">//</font>'']] 01:20, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:53, 21 March 2007

WikiProject iconLithuania Stub‑class Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Lithuania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lithuania on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LithuaniaWikipedia:WikiProject LithuaniaTemplate:WikiProject LithuaniaLithuania
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
Note icon
Review comments: Stub, unreferenced, needs more info. Andrius 13:56, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Panie Halibucie, you should consider helping by expanding this city history or it's importance in Polish history, before adding not contemporary name to an article about Lithuanian District center. Altough you should remember, that this city was allways GDL, like Seinai.--Lokyz 22:42, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Then please be informed that, besides having a significant Polish population prior to 1945, the town was also a part of Congress Poland for some time, not to mention a period when it was part of the Kingdom of Poland prior to partitions. But if that's not enough, check what was the name of the town king Stefan Batory granted city rights to in 1581... //Halibutt 10:52, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
Oh, and the name of Vygandas Marburgietis is simply hilarious. Was he a Lithuanian as well? :D //Halibuttas 10:54, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
So why don't you correct it? It's easy.--Lokyz 11:23, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
Well, in all similar cases I was instantly reverted, so perhaps I'll better stand back and wait for others to correct it? After all I'm just a POV-pushing polish nationalist... //Halibutt 13:41, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
Self portraits are usually the best likenesses. Couldn't have described the antagonist much better myself. Slightly revealing that "polish" was un-capitalized. Must have been a typo, rather than a Freudian slip though. Dr. Dan 14:12, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
No, Dan, just a quote of our Lithuanian friends. A direct quote BTW. //Halibutt 12:04, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Halibutt, in the future, please follow the guidelines in Misplaced Pages:Naming conventions (geographic names) "Alternatively, all alternative names can be moved to and explained in a "Names" or "Etymology" section immediately following the lead, or a special paragraph of the lead; we recommend that this be done if there are at least three alternate names". Novickas 16:23, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

That's satisfactory.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  22:02, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
It would be better if Halibutt spoke for himself in this matter, since he made the reverts. Novickas 00:54, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
You're almost asking for the impossible. Dr. Dan 03:53, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
As long as the historic name of that town is mentioned somewhere in the lead I'm satisfied. Bolding and putting it next to the modern name was a nicer option, but since it raises so much bad blood I could agree to a separate part of the lead. That seems like a nice solution. //Halibutt 01:20, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Categories: