| Revision as of 00:57, 13 July 2014 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,293,429 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Misplaced Pages talk:Neutral point of view/FAQ/Archive 2) (bot← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 10:06, 22 October 2023 edit undoAshvio (talk | contribs)318 edits →NPOV and gender pronounsTag: 2017 wikitext editor | ||
| (18 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown) | |||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| __TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
| == |
== NPOV and gender pronouns == | ||
| Is the proposition "One ought to refer to people by their prefered pronouns" not a proposition Misplaced Pages should remain neutral towards according to NPOV? ] (]) 20:02, 26 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
| There is a discussion at ] regarding WP policy and assertions supported by public documents. – ] (]) 20:14, 12 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :Are there any reliable sources that indicate that ] people is useful discourse? Should we consider whether calling other users slurs is NPOV also? Not sure I understand the purpose of this question. ] (]) 09:42, 22 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 10:06, 22 October 2023
 Archives | ||
|
||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 15 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
NPOV and gender pronouns
Is the proposition "One ought to refer to people by their prefered pronouns" not a proposition Misplaced Pages should remain neutral towards according to NPOV? 212.55.46.63 (talk) 20:02, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
- Are there any reliable sources that indicate that misgendering people is useful discourse? Should we consider whether calling other users slurs is NPOV also? Not sure I understand the purpose of this question. Ashvio (talk) 09:42, 22 October 2023 (UTC)