| Revision as of 22:26, 16 December 2007 editTijuana Brass (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,513 edits →Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Sarah Kreager: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 19:21, 27 October 2023 edit undoApocheir (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users10,849 edits Notification: proposed deletion of Theresa Carpinelli.Tag: Twinkle | ||
| (19 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <center><br><div style="align: center; width: 60%; padding: 1em; border: solid 2px gold; background-color: black;"> | <div class="center"><br><div style="align: center; width: 60%; padding: 1em; border: solid 2px gold; background-color: black;"> | ||
| '''< |
'''<span style="color: white;">S E M I - R E T I R E D</span>]'''</div><br></div> | ||
| <center>'''This user left Misplaced Pages in January 2007 |
<div class="center">'''This user left Misplaced Pages in January 2007 but comes to visit now and then'''</div> | ||
| Plenty of reasons why. Most of all, it just isn't fun anymore. I'll save the lengthy analysis of what is wrong with wikipedia for another time. | Plenty of reasons why. Most of all, it just isn't fun anymore. I'll save the lengthy analysis of what is wrong with wikipedia for another time. | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| ] 21:32, 19 September 2006 (UTC) | ] 21:32, 19 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ⚫ | ==I thought this was unkind== | ||
| ⚫ | Please don't refer to the things I write as "chatter." It is demeaning and rude, especially after, in the RfC, I had ''specifically'' explained that I found that rude when Dbachmann did it earlier. Second, please try to keep your comments on all talk pages and RfCs focused on the matter at hand and refrain from bringing up unrelated matters or old vendettas. This RfC is not about Deeceevoice, it is about many users who feel they have been treated with no respect by Dbachmann, including myself. I found your interjection off topic and unhelpful. If you ''do'' have something to add, can you do it in such a way that's more calm and constructive? I'm also letting you know that you made me angry, but I'm trying to be non-confrontational about it. ] (]) 12:55, 27 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
| == |
==ArbCom== | ||
| ⚫ | I have filed a case , I just listed myself an Dbachmann as the involved parties, because I was unsure how to do it, if you would also like to be listed as an involved party and make a statement, please feel free to add your name and statement. ] 20:50, 30 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ⚫ | Hi Justforasecond, I noticed that you opposed my arbitration candidacy on the basis that, as I'm a checkuser ombudsperson, I "monitor arbcom" and this would create a conflict of interest. I'm just a bit confused about this - because I said in my candidate statement that if it was felt that it would be a COI to hold the two roles I would gladly step down as an ombudsperson. ] 22:53, 3 December 2007 (UTC) | ||
| I think you have a misunderstanding about the sockpuppet, checkuser and privacy policies. There are many reasons that alternate accounts might be blocked, including trolling and other forms of disruption. Regardless, the accounts blocked by Jayjg need to be listed so that the arbitrators can evaluate the appropriateness of the individual blocks and use of checkuser. For example, if one account was being disruptive, this might justify a checkuser that would uncover the other accounts. On the other hand, if all the accounts were behaving within Misplaced Pages norms, there might be an argument that checkuser was inappropriate. It looks however, like they would prefer a direct complaint to arbcom-L at wikipedia dot org. ] 23:17, 20 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Re-labeling the accounts is fine. Read the comments of the arbitrators so far. If the request is rejected, which seems likely, the next step would be either a complaint to the noticeboard or an admin-conduct RFC. Your best argument either way would be to say that you are not a banned user, that the accounts were never used for a banned purpose (such as vote stacking or false consensus on an article talk page) and that the edits that probably triggered the check (to Jews for Jesus) were not disruptive enough to justify checkusering you--therefore Jayjg's actions were inappropriate. I haven't checked the contribs of Enlightening so I don't know how good of an argument you are likely to be able to make. I also see you were caught using sockpuppets for a banned purpose back in February, so this will hurt your chances this time around. ] 23:45, 20 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | :I think you might be a bit confused about the role of the ombudsperson. They don't actually have anything to do with the arbitration committee or blocking - their only role is to investigate complaints about CheckUser data being disclosed in breach of the privacy policy. ] 08:57, 4 December 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ==Thanks for the comments== | |||
| ⚫ | == ] == | ||
| This stuff is tedious, isn't it? ] 06:32, 3 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Just, you might want to remove your retirement banners on your user and user talk pages... ] 23:24, 8 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | For starters, keep in mind that AfD isn't a numerical vote; consensus is based upon editors bringing up reasons according to Misplaced Pages guidelines for a keep or delete. In this case, the reasons to keep the article were primarily based upon predictions that it ''may'' become a long-lasting news item of notability, which isn't an acceptable reason (] applies here, among other reasons). Perhaps more importantly, though, the ] article paralleled the same content while focusing on the larger (and more notable) issue, drawing in all parties involved; keeping both articles would just duplicate information. | ||
| ⚫ | ==Orphaned |
||
| ⚫ | Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The |
||
| ⚫ | You can bring up the issue at Deletion Review if you disagree; I won't take it personally. I would instead suggest focusing on working on the Baltimore article, however, as there's not a need to have two articles with the same content. Cheers, ] (]) 22:26, 16 December 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ⚫ | If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that |
||
| == jpgordon == | |||
| ==Guidelines for notable references== | |||
| In a discussion at ] on 8 March 2007, you said: "Please review the guidelines for notable references." Are these different from the guidelines at ]? I hadn't heard of notability for references before. Can you provide a citation for me? Thanks. --] 23:36, 21 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Ok so I came to your page and I changed the retired thing cause it was totaly misleading! I also explaned that on your talk page I think nicely... but that jpgordon guy came to my page to tell me not to do that! WTF i figure if you had a problem with it you would have said so, it's not like I blanked all your info!!! Plus what buisness is it of his anyway... well I thought I would let you know it seems he has a personal vendeta against you... cool!!! I can't seem to get under people's skin that much (yet!) but I think my latest comment will get me blackballed! LOL ] (]) 16:38, 20 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Retirement notice== | |||
| == Semi-Re.... == | |||
| Hello, Justforasecond. I removed the retirement notices from your user and user talk pages, since it looks like you've returned and they're therefore a bit misleading. Feel free to return them should you decide to leave the project again. Thanks! — ] ] 23:46, 21 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| I wanted to do it to your since I saw it... but it's just plain mean and wrong. So i put it on my page. have a look if you want ^^ ] (]) 16:52, 20 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Copyright problems with Image:Amenemhet III.jpg == | |||
| <div style="padding:5px; background-color:#E1F1DE;"> An image that you uploaded, ], has been listed at ] because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Misplaced Pages (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its ], if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -]] 16:09, 25 November 2007 (UTC)<!-- Template:Idw-cp --> </div> | |||
| ==Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Yoshimura webpage.JPG== | |||
| ⚫ | ==I thought this was unkind== | ||
| Thanks for uploading ''']'''. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at ] carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at ] is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. | |||
| ⚫ | Please don't refer to the things I write as "chatter." It is demeaning and rude, especially after, in the RfC, I had ''specifically'' explained that I found that rude when Dbachmann did it earlier. Second, please try to keep your comments on all talk pages and RfCs focused on the matter at hand and refrain from bringing up unrelated matters or old vendettas. This RfC is not about Deeceevoice, it is about many users who feel they have been treated with no respect by Dbachmann, including myself. I found your interjection off topic and unhelpful. If you ''do'' have something to add, can you do it in such a way that's more calm and constructive? I'm also letting you know that you made me angry, but I'm trying to be non-confrontational about it. ] (]) 12:55, 27 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
| If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our ]. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair -->] (]) 03:18, 12 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==ArbCom== | |||
| ⚫ | I have filed a case , I just listed myself an Dbachmann as the involved parties, because I was unsure how to do it, if you would also like to be listed as an involved party and make a statement, please feel free to add your name and statement. ] 20:50, 30 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ⚫ | Hi Justforasecond, I noticed that you opposed my arbitration candidacy on the basis that, as I'm a checkuser ombudsperson, I "monitor arbcom" and this would create a conflict of interest. I'm just a bit confused about this - because I said in my candidate statement that if it was felt that it would be a COI to hold the two roles I would gladly step down as an ombudsperson. ] 22:53, 3 December 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ==Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Miami vice don johnson.jpg== | |||
| ⚫ | :I think you might be a bit confused about the role of the ombudsperson. They don't actually have anything to do with the arbitration committee or blocking - their only role is to investigate complaints about CheckUser data being disclosed in breach of the privacy policy. ] 08:57, 4 December 2007 (UTC) | ||
| Thank you for uploading ''']'''. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by ]. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from ] is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an ]; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale. | |||
| If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our ]. If you have any questions, please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair -->] (]) 16:03, 8 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | == ] == | ||
| ==Unspecified source for ]== | |||
| ⚫ | For starters, keep in mind that AfD isn't a numerical vote; consensus is based upon editors bringing up reasons according to Misplaced Pages guidelines for a keep or delete. In this case, the reasons to keep the article were primarily based upon predictions that it ''may'' become a long-lasting news item of notability, which isn't an acceptable reason (] applies here, among other reasons). Perhaps more importantly, though, the ] article paralleled the same content while focusing on the larger (and more notable) issue, drawing in all parties involved; keeping both articles would just duplicate information. | ||
| ⚫ | You can bring up the issue at Deletion Review if you disagree; I won't take it personally. I would instead suggest focusing on working on the Baltimore article, however, as there's not a need to have two articles with the same content. Cheers, ] (]) 22:26, 16 December 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ] | |||
| Thanks for uploading ''']'''. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the ] status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged. | |||
| As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{Tl|GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the ]. If you believe the media meets the criteria at ], use a tag such as {{tlp|non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at ]. See ] for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. | |||
| If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following . '''Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on ]. If the image is copyrighted under a ] (per ]) then '''the image will be deleted ] after 14:23, 22 March 2008 (UTC)'''. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Image source --> ]≈<small>]</small> 14:23, 22 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Possibly unfree Image:Barrel_racing.jpg == | |||
| An image that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ] because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the ]. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at ] if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ]≈<small>]</small> 14:24, 22 March 2008 (UTC) <!-- Template:Idw-pui --> | |||
| == Comments on ] == | |||
| Talk pages are not a venue for your opinions of the subject of the article. I have removed your comments. Please restrict yourself to article-related discussion on talk pages in future. — ] ] 16:52, 19 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | ==Orphaned non-free media (Image:Miami vice don johnson.jpg)== | ||
| ⚫ | ] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, it is currently ], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. ] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | ||
| ⚫ | If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> ] (]) 07:27, 2 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
| == Kwanzaa redux == | |||
| You were unblocked, , solely because you promised CBD that you would avoid the ] article, which you seem to be unable to edit without engaging in edit warring. Please be advised that if you resume edit warring on that article, I will reinstate the suspended block. ] (]) 02:43, 5 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
| Someone's reaalllly doesn't like me. I thought we focused on the ''edits'', not the ''editor''? I responded on his talk..... ] (]) 02:50, 5 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == June 2014 == | |||
| ] Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to ]. Your edits appear to be ] and have been ]. If you believe the information you added was correct, please ] or discuss the changes on the article's ] before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the ]. ''See ]''<!-- Template:uw-error2 --> ] (]) 19:53, 4 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] (]) 22:28, 17 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="afd-notice"> | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. | |||
| <!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 18:24, 1 May 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| <blockquote>'''Not notable. Even if Misplaced Pages issue she wrote about was notable, that doesn't make a small-town radio host and blogger notable.'''</blockquote> | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 19:21, 27 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 19:21, 27 October 2023
S E M I - R E T I R E D]
This user left Misplaced Pages in January 2007 but comes to visit now and then
Plenty of reasons why. Most of all, it just isn't fun anymore. I'll save the lengthy analysis of what is wrong with wikipedia for another time.
See yall round.
Justforasecond 21:32, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
I thought this was unkind
Please don't refer to the things I write as "chatter." It is demeaning and rude, especially after, in the RfC, I had specifically explained that I found that rude when Dbachmann did it earlier. Second, please try to keep your comments on all talk pages and RfCs focused on the matter at hand and refrain from bringing up unrelated matters or old vendettas. This RfC is not about Deeceevoice, it is about many users who feel they have been treated with no respect by Dbachmann, including myself. I found your interjection off topic and unhelpful. If you do have something to add, can you do it in such a way that's more calm and constructive? I'm also letting you know that you made me angry, but I'm trying to be non-confrontational about it. futurebird (talk) 12:55, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
ArbCom
I have filed a case here, I just listed myself an Dbachmann as the involved parties, because I was unsure how to do it, if you would also like to be listed as an involved party and make a statement, please feel free to add your name and statement. futurebird 20:50, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi Justforasecond, I noticed that you opposed my arbitration candidacy on the basis that, as I'm a checkuser ombudsperson, I "monitor arbcom" and this would create a conflict of interest. I'm just a bit confused about this - because I said in my candidate statement that if it was felt that it would be a COI to hold the two roles I would gladly step down as an ombudsperson. Rebecca 22:53, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- I think you might be a bit confused about the role of the ombudsperson. They don't actually have anything to do with the arbitration committee or blocking - their only role is to investigate complaints about CheckUser data being disclosed in breach of the privacy policy. Rebecca 08:57, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Sarah Kreager
For starters, keep in mind that AfD isn't a numerical vote; consensus is based upon editors bringing up reasons according to Misplaced Pages guidelines for a keep or delete. In this case, the reasons to keep the article were primarily based upon predictions that it may become a long-lasting news item of notability, which isn't an acceptable reason (WP:NOT#NEWS applies here, among other reasons). Perhaps more importantly, though, the Baltimore bus beating article paralleled the same content while focusing on the larger (and more notable) issue, drawing in all parties involved; keeping both articles would just duplicate information.
You can bring up the issue at Deletion Review if you disagree; I won't take it personally. I would instead suggest focusing on working on the Baltimore article, however, as there's not a need to have two articles with the same content. Cheers, Tijuana Brass (talk) 22:26, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
jpgordon
Ok so I came to your page and I changed the retired thing cause it was totaly misleading! I also explaned that on your talk page I think nicely... but that jpgordon guy came to my page to tell me not to do that! WTF i figure if you had a problem with it you would have said so, it's not like I blanked all your info!!! Plus what buisness is it of his anyway... well I thought I would let you know it seems he has a personal vendeta against you... cool!!! I can't seem to get under people's skin that much (yet!) but I think my latest comment will get me blackballed! LOL John Doe or Jane Doe (talk) 16:38, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
Semi-Re....
I wanted to do it to your since I saw it... but it's just plain mean and wrong. So i put it on my page. have a look if you want ^^ John Doe or Jane Doe (talk) 16:52, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Yoshimura webpage.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Yoshimura webpage.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Misplaced Pages:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:18, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Miami vice don johnson.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Miami vice don johnson.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Misplaced Pages:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Misplaced Pages:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:03, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Unspecified source for Image:House_armed_services_committee.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:House_armed_services_committee.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Misplaced Pages:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Misplaced Pages:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:23, 22 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 14:23, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
Possibly unfree Image:Barrel_racing.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Barrel_racing.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MECU≈talk 14:24, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
Comments on Talk:Perl 6
Talk pages are not a venue for your opinions of the subject of the article. I have removed your comments. Please restrict yourself to article-related discussion on talk pages in future. — Hex (❝?!❞) 16:52, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Miami vice don johnson.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Miami vice don johnson.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:27, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Kwanzaa redux
You were unblocked, many years ago, solely because you promised CBD that you would avoid the Kwanzaa article, which you seem to be unable to edit without engaging in edit warring. Please be advised that if you resume edit warring on that article, I will reinstate the suspended block. Nandesuka (talk) 02:43, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Someone's reaalllly doesn't like me. I thought we focused on the edits, not the editor? I responded on his talk..... Justforasecond (talk) 02:50, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
June 2014
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Drop bear. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. See WP:HOAX Tarl.Neustaedter (talk) 19:53, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Michael Hutchins for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Hutchins is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Michael Hutchins until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Donnie Park (talk) 22:28, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Hong Tran for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hong Tran is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Hong Tran (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Chajusong (talk) 18:24, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Theresa Carpinelli
The article Theresa Carpinelli has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not notable. Even if Misplaced Pages issue she wrote about was notable, that doesn't make a small-town radio host and blogger notable.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Apocheir (talk) 19:21, 27 October 2023 (UTC)