Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 21:50, 27 October 2023

JPxG

Voice your opinion on this candidate (talk page) (164/1/0); Scheduled to end 08:50, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination

JPxG (talk · contribs) – Ladies and gentlefolk, I have the pleasure of co-nominating JPxG, the editor-in-chief of The Signpost, who is already a rollbacker, autopatroller, mass message sender,page mover, new page reviewer, and pending changes reviewer. I have been consistently impressed by JPxG's work at WP:AFD and his careful sourcing of articles and GA/FA work. He's created hundreds of sourced articles, including many articles on islands. He's been very active on Misplaced Pages over the past three years. I think he would make a very good admin, and I think the community does, as well. Firsfron of Ronchester 03:04, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I had a Misplaced Pages account when I was 11, and I acted like it (said account is not sanctioned, its identity has been disclosed to arbitrator Barkeep49, and I am now 30). JPxG, HooptyBot and WegweiserBot are my only accounts; I do it for free, and have always done it for free. jp×g 08:49, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Misplaced Pages as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. Why are you interested in becoming an administrator?

A: I think if every single person on the planet were given free access to the sum of all human knowledge, it would rule. Everything else is implementation details. The two administrative tasks I feel I can speak most authoritatively on are deletion discussions and recent changes patrol: I've commented on a few hundred AfDs, wrote the Signpost's deletion report for a few months, and done a couple myriads of anti-vandal edits. These two things are a major part of what keeps Misplaced Pages a reliable source of high-quality information: removing good stuff is bad, and keeping bad stuff is also bad. Doing this requires someone to have a good understanding of many policies, guidelines, essays and principles, as well as a good ability to judge consensus (even if they do not agree with all of it). It also requires you to be good at realizing when you have messed up, and promptly correct yourself and apologize for it. I may not be the wisest man in Athens but I think I can help make this website be good instead of bad.

2. What are your best contributions to Misplaced Pages, and why?

A: I've done a bunch of stuff here that I would consider useful: I did 1,650 articles on a WP:CCI once, I've cleaned out old maintenance categories, worked on backlog drives, taken a Featured Picture, made a couple templates, and created a bunch of articles (including 43 DYKs, 28 GAs and 1 FA). Maybe the thing I enjoy most is the little interactions I get to have with people who aren't veteran editors, who are frustrated and not making any headway with what looks to them like a vast faceless bureaucracy: BLP subjects who want their articles deleted, musicians who want the right photos to come up when someone Googles them, antique car photographers trying to prove they aren't plagiarizing their own photos, television writers who disagree with their tweets being misquoted, et cetera. Usually, people in these situations are not acting in bad faith, there's just a lot of context (WP:V, WP:RS, and WP:CITE combined are over 11,000 words); of course some people are just determined to stay mad, but oftentimes a human person explaining things in plain English can work toward a mutually agreeable solution, and we end up with one less person in the world thinking "Oh, Misplaced Pages? That place is a clown show." Sometimes this can get pretty stressful, like when a hundred people show up to get mad about the same thing at the same time and I have to write some big FAQ about it, but on the other hand, afterwards I guess I get interviewed by Slate, so I guess it balances out.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A: There have certainly been some things that have not developed to my preference, and some things that have given me heartburn. I've created articles from redlinks that were nominated for deletion; one of these (the most-!voted-on AfD of August 2021) actually got canned. So it goes. Sometimes a RM moves an article I've written to a title I hate. So it goes. What I do in all of these cases is basically the same: I look at the information, I form an opinion, I express it as reasonably as possible, and do my best to show people the merits of my perspective. Whether I succeed or fail in any given case, the process serves its purpose. I laugh, I cry, and I move on with my life. Ultimately, for me, it comes down to the fact that everyone you disagree with is another human being who decided to spend their free time writing an encyclopedia. There aren't many people with this particular condition, so you're going to be running into the same ones for quite some time. If we hate each other, it slowly turns the place into a hellhole. Of course, there are some people who aren't here to build an encyclopedia, or whose conduct is so completely at odds with doing so that intervention is needed; even then, however, "getting mad online" is rarely a good intervention.

You may ask optional questions below. There is a limit of two questions per editor. Multi-part questions disguised as one question, with the intention of evading the limit, are disallowed. Follow-up questions relevant to questions you have already asked are allowed.

Optional question from Folly Mox

4. I notice this RfA is substantially similar to its initial recension from a year ago. Has anything changed in that time that you'd like to bring up?

A: I was pretty busy then, and have become somewhat less so. At some point last week I decided to circle next Wednesday on my calendar, and told my friends to mock me relentlessly if I didn't have it submitted by then. Somehow this ended up being October 25th, the exact date of the original nomination. Frankly, for this to have been a complete coincidence stretches even my own suspension of disbelief, so I suppose either Providence has a sense of humor or I unintentionally did it on purpose. Perhaps both.

Optional question from Moneytrees

5. Do you intend on working at CCI/in copyright areas if you become an admin? My vote is not predicated on this.

A: I like to go on long walks, and these take me all over the project; I don't know if I could honestly commit myself to a specific amount of work in any area. I do hear often that the CCIers are drowning in backlog, so if I can lend a hand, it seems prudent — either going through casepages and diffs myself, or helping out with tools and scripts. I hesitate to call myself an expert in copyright policy, so anything higher-level than that may involve a lot of remedial questions on my part.

Optional question from Banks Irk

6. What in the world was going on in January 2023 that you made 15,999 edits - over 500 per day? And why stop one short of 16,000?

A: In the last few months I've embarked on a somewhat ambitious project to clean up Signpost stuff and introduce/automate some features; per {{Signpost/Number of pages}} (which I made in July), "Signpost stuff" encompasses some 12,870 pages. Running a newspaper, with its own publication scripts and template stack, on top of the English Misplaced Pages for nearly two decades is a quite intricate task that required the efforts of many wise people over many years — it is my own welds joining steel forged by many — but you can see what I was up to in January in the history of, for example, Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2005-09-19/ArbCom election. Most of those 16,000 edits were me integrating a bunch of the old category system into the 2015-vintage tag system, delinking dates in bylines, and harmonizing all articles to use the same header and footer templates that give consistent formatting, emit title and author metadata, etc. This involved a lot of extremely complicated and/or cursed AWB find-replace, so I did it in a few runs, across a few thousand articles. The result, though, is that stuff like Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/Author was made possible (and Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/Author/Michael_Snow, for example, really does go all the way back to 2005). As for why it's 15,999, I can only surmise another instance of divine humor — there is probably some marginal template redirect that could be undeleted to bring it back to a round 16k, but there is also a certain perfection in imperfection.

Discussion

• Links for JPxG: JPxG (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
• Edit summary usage for JPxG can be found here.

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review their contributions before commenting.

Support

1. Stephen 09:05, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
2. Thank you for volunteering. I like the answer to question 2. Cielquiparle (talk) 09:24, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
3. Support Was aware of this one stuck in development hell for a while, and did all my research back then. No concerns. And per HJ Mitchell, anyone who can stand their ground at FAC and persuade people absolutely has the right temperament to be an administrator. Ritchie333 09:26, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
4. Support - While I have not had a lot of interaction with this candidate, I have found their contributions to be intelligent and level-headed. Net positive.Onel5969 09:30, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
5. Support. In addition to an impressive record of content creation, being the editor-in-chief of The Signpost for more than a year speaks volumes of your dedication to the project. Very happy to support someone who knows what we're here for (e.g. free as in freedom), whose interactions with me has been nothing but positive. Keep up the great work! 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 09:39, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
6. Support from Therealscorp1an (talk) 09:45, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
7. Support net positive.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 09:48, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
8. Support Thanks for all your hard work, which is much appreciated. Schwede66 09:50, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
9. Support: experienced editor, civil, net positive. Schminnte 09:51, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
10. Support net positive - SchroCat (talk) 09:54, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
11. Support Elli (talk | contribs) 09:55, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
12. No issues from where I'm looking. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:56, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
13. ltbdl (talk) 09:59, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
14. Support Cabayi (talk) 10:03, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
15. Support. I've known JPxG for a while, and although I hardly agree with them on everything, I strongly admire their thorough responsiveness to criticism as well as their persistence and passion for contributing to the project. They would be a significant net positive as an admin. ––FormalDude (talk) 10:09, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
16. Support seen them around a while and don't recall them ever doing something that would warrant an oppose. AryKun (talk) 10:12, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
17. Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/Powder House Island/archive1 is enough on its own to gain my support. Not only did you write an FA from scratch but you were challenged quite strongly on your sourcing. You did everything you could to assuage the concerns and dig up more and better sources and comply with the FA criteria and you never showed any frustration (it's difficult not to feel it when your hard work is challenged, but we have to remember that the aim is to make the encyclopaedia better). If you apply that zen approach to adminship, you'll be fine. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 10:17, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
18. Support Can use tools, won't abuse tools. -- Kicking222 (talk) 10:39, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
19. zoglophie 10:42, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
20. Jenks24 (talk) 10:45, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
21. Strong support: a solid content contributor, experienced in policy, helpful around many areas of the site and technically adept. CCI is the Aegean stables of Misplaced Pages and we should give anyone a mop if they're willing to go anywhere near there. JPxG has a good sense of humour and proportion that serves them well in contentious areas, whether it's articles on hot topics, The Signpost or internal discussions like XfD. Thank you for running! — Bilorv (talk) 10:57, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
22. Support Have had positive experiences working with JPxG on Signpost technical matters. Strong support. — Mr. Stradivarius 11:14, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
23. Support - dedicated editor, knows what they're doing. No concerns. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:26, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
24. Support — I was very positively impressed with how the JPxG defended 0xDeadbeef and their own RfA. JPxG made excellent arguments and came off as a very friendly, down-to-earth kind of person. Exactly someone I would feel comfortable with as admin. Good luck! Brat Forelli 11:29, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
25. Support Easily comfortable with them having the tools. Net positive if given admin rights. RickinBaltimore (talk) 11:31, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
26. Support.—Alalch E. 11:32, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
27. Support - seen them around and I haven't seen any problems. The response to Q2 about helping people out made me smile. SmartSE (talk) 11:35, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
28. Support - thought you were already an admin to be honest Mujinga (talk) 11:42, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
29. Support   ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf)  12:00, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
30. Support—Kurtis 12:02, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
31. Support: Exactly the sort of editor we should welcome to the role of admin. Your experience, credentials, and accomplishments all demonstrate both aptitude for and need of the mop. Good luck! ~ Pbritti (talk) 12:05, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
32. Support, precious --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:08, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
33. Support happy to see this RfA happening. Dreamy Jazz 12:14, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
34. Support. This editor is in my "I could have sworn they were already an admin" mental compartment.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  12:21, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
35. Support. Promising editor, plenty of experience, and great contributor. The 🏎 Corvette 🏍 ZR1 12:27, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
36. Support. This is one of those rare "Well, yeah, obviously" ones. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:28, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
37. Support – no concerns, a net positive to the project. Edward-Woodrow • talk 12:28, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
38. Support, despite doubts as to whether they are old enough to use a mop responsibly. Gog the Mild (talk) 12:30, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

    Having been prompted, I now recall promoting their FAC nomination. The voting here looks to be near unanimous, but if anyone should doubt the candidate's suitability for adminship, on grounds of youthful inexperience or any other, I suggest they read it - Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/Powder House Island/archive1. Grace under pressure and a fine example of Wikipedianshipness. Gog the Mild (talk) 23:01, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

    Maybe this is sarcasm I didn't get, but is 30 really too young for adminship? AryKun (talk) 12:57, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

    I'm guessing it's a joke. If it is not, then I will note that the sitting Arb writing this comment is close to a decade younger than JP. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 14:34, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

39. Strong support. I recall only positive and productive interactions. Has a clue. Needs a mop. BD2412 T 12:38, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
40. Support Why not? Double sharp (talk) 12:59, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
41. Support, net positive, helpful user, let's give JPxG a go. --Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:00, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
42. Meets my criteria. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:05, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
43. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 13:09, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
44. Support No concerns, nice work on the Signpost. ARandomName123 (talk) 13:11, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
45. Support no concerns, positive impression of their work on the project. Skynxnex (talk) 13:15, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
46. Support I know people say this a lot, but I honestly thought that he was already an admin. He is certainly qualified for the mop. QuicoleJR (talk) 13:20, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
47. Support: No brainer. Although, just out of curiosity, I wonder what happened a year ago (in reference to Optional Question #1). It's me... Sallicio! 13:25, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
48. Support WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 13:26, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
49. Support: ...well, duh. Given that the user has already demonstrated a great capability in the numerous important roles at Misplaced Pages, it is certain to me that they will thrive in an administrative role. No complaints, no 'wucking forries', as I like to say. Good luck. - McBuggie "Bugs" 13:40, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
50. Support BeanieFan11 (talk) 13:41, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
51. Support net positive! Tails Wx 13:44, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
52. Support based on overall impression, past interactions, and a more recent (re)review. I don't always agree with everything JPxG does or says, but I feel he is ready for the tools and would be a net positive. Eddie891 _Work 13:46, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
53. Strong support. JPxG is both thoughtful and competent. I thought he was already an admin; time to fix that. DFlhb (talk) 13:54, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
54. Support. Of course. ULPS 14:07, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
55. Thought they were one already (t · c) buidhe 14:12, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
56. Support, willing to tackle CCI (I ought to start helping out there myself again, but it's a slog to be sure), long-term editor with a lot of positive contributions and a clearly solid knowledge of how to do things. Seraphimblade 14:25, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
57. Oppose, as this RfA has been overdue for a long time now. Shows a significant lack of judgement on the candidate's part - they should have known they were fully ready a long while back! In all seriousness, though - ideal candidate for the mop in my view. JavaHurricane 14:29, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

    JavaHurricane, just a thought, did you mean to vote Oppose in the support section? Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 01:26, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

    @Yoshi24517, I think JavaHurricane meant to support, as indicated by the rest of his comment. – Epicgenius (talk) 12:31, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

58. Support Why not. -- 𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 14:32, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
59. Support appears to be a nice person, which IMO is way more important than any skill (that one could learn, unlike the former). AstonishingTunesAdmirer 連絡 14:36, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
60. Support, I genuinely thought you already were an admin. Happy editing, SilverTiger12 (talk) 14:42, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
61. Support one of the fairest and finest editors on this project. 100k edits, much content creation, reasoned posts in drama boards, and great AfD participation. 100% A+ Lightburst (talk) 14:45, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
62. Support Noah, AA 14:55, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
63. Support. Sure, why not. Outstanding Move! 🛧Midori No Sora♪🛪 ( ☁＝☁＝✈) 14:56, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
64. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 15:00, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
65. Strong support. Been waiting for this one. Clyde

    (edit conflict) Also, 2 RfAs at once? It's a October 26 miracle! Clyde 15:12, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

66. Support Why not? Lightoil (talk) 15:11, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
67. Strong support for JPxG. Outstanding editor. Didn't know you could have someone nominate you and accept a year later. SWinxy (talk) 15:14, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
68. WTF. A classic case of "I was sure he was one already" syndrome. Let's fix that. RoySmith (talk) 15:23, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
69. Strong Support - No concern. Kind regards~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 15:31, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
70. Strong support - never seen anything but beneficial edits, positive contribution, and a helpful demeanor from candidate. microbiologyMarcus 15:38, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
71. Support nihil obstat. I thought that JPxG was already an admin for a while. #prodraxis 15:39, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
72. Support No objections, and since this nomination has aged/marinated/fermented for a full year, I guess it's ripe by now. Banks Irk (talk) 15:42, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
73. Support spryde | talk 15:48, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
74. Support, no concerns. Vanamonde (Talk) 15:51, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
75. Support, no-brainer, an instant yes. Blythwood (talk) 15:59, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
76. Support. I know how trite this rationale is, but I thought they were already an admin. Sincerely, Novo Tape (She/Her) 16:07, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
77. Support will be a net positive to the project. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:13, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
78. Support they wrote a GA about a molecule looking like a caterpillar. That alone should suffice, but also eminently nice to work with and competent. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 16:19, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
79. Support No concerns, the editor is strong in many areas and seems level headed. Bruxton (talk) 17:04, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
80. Will make good use of additional tools, from what I've seen —siroχo 17:30, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
81. Support Wingwatchers (talk) 17:37, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
82. Support Leijurv (talk) 17:38, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
83. Support Looks great and proven in every area that I can imagine.North8000 (talk) 18:01, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
84. Support Helpful editor across many different types of tasks. Good demeanor in discussions will help as a future admin. Thanks for volunteering for the mop! Loopy30 (talk) 18:04, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
85. Support In the list of users who I thought were already admins until I see their name at RFA, JPxG might be at the top of that list. Very levelheaded editor who I have seen a fair amount in different parts of enwiki and who has been helpful anywhere they have been. TartarTorte 18:05, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
86. Support Skilled, helpful, experience in areas that are good training for adminship. Good temperament. Definitely a net positive. Donner60 (talk) 18:08, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
87. Support. I expect a good Signpost article written about this :p –MJL ‐Talk‐ 18:10, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
88. Support My personal interactions with and past observations of JPxG convince me that they would make an excellent admin. —Ganesha811 (talk) 18:15, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
89. (edit conflict) Strong support an RfA I've been waiting to support for over a year now. You had to transclude while I was asleep and make me support 89, didn't you? :) Vaticidalprophet 18:16, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
90. Support: Big fan of theirs for a while now and I'm quite pleased to see this. Even if they're not perfect off the get go, I'm confident they'll be a great asset to the admin corps. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:38, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
91. Support A stellar candidate. Glad to finally see this RfA go live. Curbon7 (talk) 18:45, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
92. Support Handling of Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/Powder House Island/archive1 was impressive, especially for a first nomination and an article written from scratch. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 18:46, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
93. Support as nominator. Firsfron of Ronchester 18:53, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
94. Frostly (talk) 19:06, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
95. Full Support. Didn't even realize they weren't an admin. --JackFromWisconsin (talk | contribs) 19:07, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
96. Support: ya love to see it. I had something longer written out for whenever this happens, but... meh, just excited this is happening! theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 19:13, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
97. Strong support, it will be an honour for Misplaced Pages. They should have been offered the mop ages ago, no need to run an RfA. — kashmīrī  19:35, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
98. Support: More admins crushing vandalism! --TylerBurden (talk) 19:36, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
99. Support Does good work and varied experience. Long timer for his age. GenQuest 19:52, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
100. Support No issues. -Kj cheetham (talk) 19:57, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
101. Support --Minoa (talk) 20:06, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
102. Support. No concerns. RegentsPark (comment) 20:10, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
103. Trusted, competent. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:12, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
104. Support. Read this candidate often, and each time I just assume they're already an admin. Need dozens more like this one! P.I. Ellsworth , ed.  20:25, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
105. Support No concerns. Ruy (talk) 20:27, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
106. Support, no issues.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:32, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
107. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 20:41, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
108. Support unreservedly. Good Q2. -- asilvering (talk) 20:44, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
109. Support - Happy to see this. Candidate was on my short list of editors I was hoping would become an admin. Tons of clue, common sense, and helpfulness. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 20:49, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
110. Support I think this is the third time I was surprised to see someone at RfA because I thought they were already an admin. :) – dudhhr_contribsher 21:07, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
111. Support Partofthemachine (talk) 21:08, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
112. Support --Vacant0 (talk) 21:20, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
113. Support I already thought this user was already an admin because of their temperament and the crazy amount of content creation. Crazy to think that we have 2 RfA open and both are most likely going to succeed. Nagol0929 (talk) 21:28, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
114. Support. Excellent candidate- no concerns. VickKiang (talk) 22:00, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
115. Support. Good temperament, no black marks, and a willingness to work in the trenches as well as the ivory towers. Should have applied sooner. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 22:07, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
116. Support Andre🚐 22:16, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
117. Support solid, steady editor, like the responses and their willingness to help out further. Ravensfire (talk) 22:25, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
118. Yes Alpha3031 (t • c) 23:11, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
119. Support I doubt we need 7 days for this (one). Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 23:19, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
120. Support - The thoughtfulness and thoroughness in the standard and optional questions, along with a quality content editing history, and clear dedication to the project through The Signpost make this an increadibly easy vote. Good luck! —Sirdog (talk) 23:50, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
121. Support - I respect the candidate for his cleanup work and his many GAs/DYKs. I have seen him around quite a bit and think he would be a net positive addition to the admin corps. Though my only question is why he didn't run sooner... – Epicgenius (talk) 00:09, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
122. Support I have always had great experiences working with JPxG. Legoktm (talk) 00:54, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
123. Support - no concerns. _signed, Rosguill 01:58, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
124. Support Very experienced guy. He deserves to be admin. Mox Eden (talk) 02:27, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
125. Support I like the statement removing good stuff is bad, and keeping bad stuff is also bad. Great philosophy. Joyous! Noise! 02:55, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
126. Support: experienced editor, civil, net positive. Go4thProsper (talk) 02:59, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
127. CaptainEek ⚓ 03:09, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
128. Support 1146 out of 1200 admin score, good candidate. ScratchyGamer314 (talk) 03:58, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
129. JPxG is always irreverent, sometimes annoying, and occasionally massively wrong. This was once the prevailing admin archetype, and who says Gen X and Boomers should have a monopoly on it? He knows what he's doing, and I've never once seen him motivated by something other than the best interests of the project, nor seen him refuse to back down when it turned out everyone else had a different sense of those best interests. He knows how content works, and knows how the community works, which is 1 more of those 2 things than most candidates have. Support. -- Tamzin (they|xe|she) 04:07, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
130. Support. bibliomaniac15 04:43, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
131. Support – no problems here; has done good work on The Signpost. Graham87 (talk) 04:44, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
132. Support Another "He wasn't yet?" candidate. Daniel Case (talk) 05:09, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
133. Glad to Support Volten001 05:42, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
134. I don't really know JPxG in the mainspace, but it's been a pleasure collaborating with every editor on the SP, and judging all the answers and support rationales, I'm an unwavering supporter of this RfA. GeraldWL 05:54, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
135. Support can be trusted with the tools Polyamorph (talk) 06:18, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
136. I believe the smooth running of the signpost is enough to demonstrate competency, and I would say that they aren't going to make a complete mess with the tools (don't quote that if they do mess up please ;) ) so I Support Zippybonzo | talk | contribs (he|she|they) 07:46, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
137. Don't recall personal interactions with them but "Not a jerk, has a clue" applies.--NØ 07:59, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
138. Support, wish we had a dozen like this editor up for admin. Randy Kryn (talk) 10:00, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
139. Support - no issues, thought they were already an admin to be completely honest. Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 10:56, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
140. Support has a clue, no concerns KylieTastic (talk) 11:01, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
141. Support have read their Signpost content, and their work there alone shows me that JpXg is sufficient as an admin. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JuxtaposedJacob (talk • contribs) 12:05, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
142. Support. Easy call to make, especially for a fellow JPG. JPG-GR (talk) 12:08, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
143. Support. Very competent editor who is clearly here with the intent to improve the project. Thryduulf (talk) 12:27, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
144. Suppport I mean, why not? Best, Reading Beans (talk) 12:40, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
145. Support No concerns from me. Good Luck!   Aloha27  talk  13:18, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
146. Support for the muckraker admin.  Spintendo  13:57, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
147. Support Seems trustworthy to me. WaggersTALK 14:27, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
148. Support I trust JPxG with my life. — GhostRiver 14:44, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
149. Support No concerns. Industrious editor. – SD0001 (talk) 14:45, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
150. Support – Seen the candidate around a lot, mostly top experience, even on their bad days never so below standard that it would be problematic in an admin. As others have said, should have applied sooner, will be a huge plus as an admin. Glad to see all editors agree though (that one oppose at the moment is based on a misunderstanding and so doesn't really count). ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 15:24, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
151. Support — Rhododendrites \\ 15:40, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
152. Support LGTM --DannyS712 (talk) 15:41, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
153. Sure. I'd also like to give a heartfelt thank you for giving your all into helping keep the Signpost running. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 16:08, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
154. Support Cant see why not. scope_creep 16:13, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
155. Support — TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 16:41, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
156. Support --Victor Trevor (talk) 17:18, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
157. Support - I see no issues with this person who has shown dedication to the project. ~ ONUnicornproblem solving 17:29, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
158. I have seen the candidate around many times over the last few years, and have long thought they would make an excellent administrator. --Dylan620 (he/him · talk · edits) 17:35, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
159. Support. Seems more than apt for the role. Sole oppose doesn't provide anything of persuasive value. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 18:31, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
160. Go for it. — Fox 19:00, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
161. Support ResonantDis_tortion 19:22, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
162. Support, but of course, with due reluctance. The editor does much more astronomy article work and DYK editing than Plantipedia editing looking over the 500 most recent edits. Just one plant-ish article edit, I-17 Mystery Christmas Tree. Sure, all those bright lights in the sky are like, important, or something, but would it kill ya' to improve some more plant articles? (Seriously, though, thanks for applying for a mop.) 🌿MtBotany (talk) 19:23, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
163. Support: JPxG is a prolific editor and their dedication to Misplaced Pages is evidence from their hard work modernizing The Signpost. They'll be an asset to AfD! ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him) 21:40, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
164. Support, with no hesitancy and with high enthusiasm. Obviously intelligent and very articulate. I've seen the candidate around, and everything has been positive. Really checks all the boxes. --Tryptofish (talk) 21:49, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

1. Oppose looked through the logs, triggered a number of spam block list logs --Cupkake4Yoshi (talk) 22:20, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

   I'm vehemently opposed to questioning votes pro or con at RFAs, but why does an account created yesterday get to vote? (Yeah, I know it's a discussion not a vote) Banks Irk (talk) 22:30, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

   All Wikipedians—including those without an account or not logged in ("anons")—are welcome to comment and ask questions in an RfA, but numerical (#) "votes" in the Support, Oppose, and Neutral sections may only be placed by editors while logged in to their account. from WP:RFA. There is likely to be discussion of basic franchise in the history of WT:RFA if you would like to hunt. Izno (talk) 22:49, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

   Yeah, I know. It was more of a rhetorical question. Banks Irk (talk) 22:54, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

   I do feel like this oppose vote is unwarranted and the explanation for it is confusing, but I would feel uncomfortable with any elitism on RfA votes.

   Misplaced Pages even actively encourages everyone to vote because RfAs are shown on top of everyone's watchlist, so I assume this is a new editor who opened their watchlist, saw that, and decided to participate. Brat Forelli (talk) 23:48, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

   I do not understand what this oppose is trying to say. Pawnkingthree (talk) 23:39, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

   See JPxG spam block list log. This is a clueless oppose from a throw-away account and the AGF comments above are wildly misguided. That log might show when someone is trying to add junk to articles but in this case it shows JPxG doing valid work on Signpost articles which sometimes need links to dubious websites. That is, the oppose is nonsense. Johnuniq (talk) 00:47, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

   Ah, well done, you managed to ABF and bite in the same comment. If you go a little further, you could do some borderline incivility to get a twenty-point combo! Edward-Woodrow • talk 12:08, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

   None of which were in mainspace? Clyde 01:03, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

   The world is a scary place if this is why there's an oppose. GeraldWL 05:52, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

   Would be interesting to know what WP:SPI make of this account. Polyamorph (talk) 06:16, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

   Would need to reach out to de-wiki admins as the account is primarily active there (but it's also new there). Without the tools, I don't see any obvious signs. — kashmīrī  11:15, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

   The oppose may be silly, but wikipedians have a right to vote as they choose for whatever reasons they choose.Smallchief (talk) 15:12, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

   @Cupkake4Yoshi: I would like to inform you of something that could change your mind. As the Signpost coordinator, his job sometimes requires links to websites that are considered spam. This creates a spam block list log. He may have triggered it several times, but that does not mean he was trying to spam anything. In light of this information, please reconsider your oppose. QuicoleJR (talk) 15:14, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

Neutral

General comments

• The nom mentions a co- ? --DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:56, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
  • DoubleGrazing, the “co” part was striked. — Frostly (talk) 22:15, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

• I can confirm what JPXG says about his previous account. Barkeep49 (talk) 11:48, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

• I don't vote in these things but I think this adminship would be good for the editing community. Chris Troutman (talk) 14:38, 26 October 2023 (UTC)