| Revision as of 04:08, 14 May 2006 editMira (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers12,488 edits box on top← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 04:32, 18 November 2023 edit undoDonner60 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers235,887 edits not around since Feb 2022 |
| (693 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{not around|3=12 February 2022}} |
|
<div border="1" style="border:black solid; background-color:white; margin: 0.5em; padding: 0.5em;">Welcome to my talkpage. Please feel free to leave a comment or two. However, I reserve the right to remove vandalism and to reorganize the page as I see fit. |
|
|
|
|
|
'''''Please note that I will respond to messages here on this page, as I find the standard Misplaced Pages practice of responding on other people's pages to be confusing.''''' —]]</div> |
|
|
|
|
|
==Template:User_Antipope== |
|
|
Hi. |
|
|
|
|
|
You might be aware that there has been some contention around the use of userboxes. There has also been a new ] added with regard to templates. |
|
|
|
|
|
A box you are using, ] was recently tagged as such. I've removed the tag, but would ask that you <nowiki>{{subst:}}</nowiki> the template. You may also wish to contribute to ] if you are not already. |
|
|
|
|
|
]]<span class="plainlinks"></span> 00:08, 11 February 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
===While I'm here=== |
|
|
|
|
|
'''Welcome!''' |
|
|
|
|
|
Hello, {{PAGENAME}}, and ] to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! Please ] on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out ], ask me on my talk page, or place '''<code>{{helpme}}</code>''' on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! <br/>]]<span class="plainlinks"></span> 00:15, 11 February 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Template:User_wishful== |
|
|
Also ] has been nominated for speedy deletion under the new criterion. Iif you could remove it from your user page as a show of good faith that would be great. - ]]<span class="plainlinks"></span> 02:52, 11 February 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:Actually, I rather like it, thank you. Sheesh, I pick these up last night and people are already trying to delete them. ] 03:31, 11 February 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
::The thing is, we've had quite a bit of disruption over the last few months around user boxes. Some from admins going a bit delete happy and pushing their agenda, some from new editors not understanding that the purpose of every action here is not to create an encyclopedia pushing ''their'' agenda. Even if you simply use <nowiki>{{subst:}}</nowiki> to make it plain text instead of a template, that would be really helpful. - ]]<span class="plainlinks"></span> 05:47, 11 February 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Thank you for your concern, but as I said, I rather like it and I see nothing wrong with expressing my personal opinions on my personal page. ] 08:31, 11 February 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Your userpage was briefly delisted by a rogue admin== |
|
|
|
|
|
You have a userbox ] which links your userpage to ]. There is currently a movement to ban userboxes from Misplaced Pages which are shared and which create ]. Certain admins have taken it upon themselves to preemptively sabotage and/or delete such categories and template. Here is the ] which reported damage to yours, in which hundreds of userpages were delinked from categories without the users' knowledge. They have been stopped, barely, and the damage reverted— for now. |
|
|
|
|
|
There is a ], which if passed, will make required by policy the damage done to categories and templates such as '''User UN/United Nations Wikipedians'''. If you do not want this to happen, I urge you to vote '''Oppose.''' in the poll. Support is currently running at about 66%, and your vote could make the difference. It is said to require 75%-80% to be deemed reflective of consensus. |
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you, |
|
|
|
|
|
] 23:44, 4 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==I believe this user.....== |
|
|
|
|
|
.....might like carrots, after reading ....... ; ) ] 21:07, 6 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:Well, yes I do. :) ] 00:50, 7 March 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Kiri "weird" box... == |
|
|
|
|
|
I agree... |
|
|
Glad you removed it. |
|
|
] 18:18, 14 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==]== |
|
|
Good job on the Barbara Lawton article. You might want to join the ]. Cheers --]] 20:11, 29 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
: Done. Thanks for the invitation. ] 23:05, 29 April 2006 (UTC) |
|
