Misplaced Pages

Talk:Northern Group of Forces: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:02, 28 March 2007 editPiotrus (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers286,198 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 08:17, 29 March 2007 edit undoIrpen (talk | contribs)32,604 edits revert warringNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WPMILHIST|class=Start|Russian-task-force=yes}} {{WPMILHIST|class=Start|Russian-task-force=yes}}


==legal status==
Note on legal status: states that the legal status of Soviet troops in C/EE satellites was regulated by 1949, however all the other sources I could find state that there was no legal framework for stationment of those troops in Poland until 1956. As LOC study is rather old, I'd tend to think that modern (2004) research by Polish historians (like ) is more reliable (see also ).--<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</span></sub> 22:02, 28 March 2007 (UTC) Note on legal status: states that the legal status of Soviet troops in C/EE satellites was regulated by 1949, however all the other sources I could find state that there was no legal framework for stationment of those troops in Poland until 1956. As LOC study is rather old, I'd tend to think that modern (2004) research by Polish historians (like ) is more reliable (see also ).--<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</span></sub> 22:02, 28 March 2007 (UTC)


==revert warring==
I see that Piotrus persistently reverts me here. I am not to continue this game and if I see my edits reverted again to the POV-pushing version, I will POV-tag the article and explain its deficiencies at talk instead. I have better things to do than spend time editing to be reverted on the spot. --] 08:17, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:17, 29 March 2007

WikiProject iconMilitary history: Russian & Soviet Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.
B checklist
This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
  1. Referencing and citation: not checked
  2. Coverage and accuracy: not checked
  3. Structure: not checked
  4. Grammar and style: not checked
  5. Supporting materials: not checked
To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call:
  • | b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no>
  • | b2<!--Coverage and accuracy   --> = <yes/no>
  • | b3<!--Structure               --> = <yes/no>
  • | b4<!--Grammar and style       --> = <yes/no>
  • | b5<!--Supporting materials    --> = <yes/no>
assessing the article against each criterion.
Associated task forces:
/ 
Taskforce icon
Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force

legal status

Note on legal status: LOC article states that the legal status of Soviet troops in C/EE satellites was regulated by 1949, however all the other sources I could find state that there was no legal framework for stationment of those troops in Poland until 1956. As LOC study is rather old, I'd tend to think that modern (2004) research by Polish historians (like ) is more reliable (see also ).-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  22:02, 28 March 2007 (UTC)


revert warring

I see that Piotrus persistently reverts me here. I am not to continue this game and if I see my edits reverted again to the POV-pushing version, I will POV-tag the article and explain its deficiencies at talk instead. I have better things to do than spend time editing to be reverted on the spot. --Irpen 08:17, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Categories: